· Private foundation
Robert Zagunis Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $1k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $136k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $133k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United States Rowing Association | $132,500 |
| Oregon State University Foundation | $40,000 |
| Oregon State University Foundation | $39,000 |
| Oregon State University Foundation | $32,000 |
| Portland Japanese Garden | $25,000 |
| Bodyvox Inc | $500 |
| Nation Rowing Foundation | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Oregon State University Foundation5× · 2020–2025 · $256k · revenue +33%- USUNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATION4× · 2022–2025 · $168k · revenue +49%
- JGJAPANESE GARDEN SOCIETY OF OREGON4× · 2020–2025 · $116k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- USUnited States Fencing Associationgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +37%
- URUS ROWING FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $25k
- BDBeaver Dam Wrestling Regionalone grant, 2024 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As the national governing body, the mission of the united states figure skating association is to provide programs to encourage participation and achievement in the sport of figure skating on ice, and particularly: a) to serve as the…
Appointed as the governing body by the us olympic committee, our mission is to provide leadership and resources for the promotion growth of synchronized swimming and to achieve competitive excellence at all levels and to develop broad…
The mission of the Oregon Sports Authority, dba Sport Oregon, is to drive economic growth and enhance quality of life in Oregon through sports. This is accomplished through our work with state and regional tourism bureaus, event promoters,…
United states aquatic sports, inc is the national federation for all united states olympic aquatic sports. this includes usa swimming, usa diving, us artistic swimming, usa water polo, and us masters swi
The organizations mission is to increase sailing participation and excellence through education, competition, and equal opportunity while upholding the principles of fair play, sportsmanship, and safety.
Advance the interests of the united states in international bridge competition, including the selection and support of united states bridge teams and players in international and olympic bridge competition.
Uswf supports the olympic and national teams and the development of youth and high school wrestling through training, international travel, coaching support and resident athlete programs to grow men's and women's freestyle and greco-roman…
To practice and promote the sport of rowing in the south willamette valley
Usa racquetball, recognized by the united states olympic committee as the national governing body for the sport, is committed to our members and the growth of racquetball from recreational play to international competition.
The usta mission is growing tennis to inspire healthier people and communities everywhere.usta is the national governing body for the sport of tennis and the recognized leader in promoting and developing the sport's growth on every level…
Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United States Fencing Association and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds JAPANESE GARDEN SOCIETY OF OREGON ↗
- Who funds BEAVER DAM WRESTLING REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER ↗
- Who funds United States Fencing Association ↗
- Who funds United States Fencing Foundation ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ROWING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON MUSEUM OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRY ↗
- Who funds OREGON FENCING ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds BODYVOX INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert Zagunis Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Museum of Science and Industry — 4% of income from government
- Bodyvox Inc — 3% of income from government
- Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.