Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert Kyts and Jadwiga Roguska-Kyts

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$860k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$198k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$644kArts & Culture$297kHealth$285kInternational$272kEducation$200kCommunity Improvement$25kHuman Services$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $787k
$50,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY TRINITY POLISH MISSION$197,930
Charities Aid Foundation America (CAFA$143,263
Academy of Music of the Paderewski Sym$106,250
Federation of Polish Medical Organizat$85,000
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc$75,000
SOUNDS AND NOTES FOUNDATION$75,000
The Kosciuszko Foundation$54,500
Polonaise Org Ltd$50,000
Women's Business Development Center$25,000
Beats for Benefit NFP$15,500
GIFT FROM THE HEART FOUNDATION$9,610
Individual grant recipient$9,200
Chopin Society of Atlanta$5,450
Polish Assistance$5,400
Individual grant recipient$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%POLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 7 repeat orgs$635k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$1.2M
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-9%
+57%

Still filing today

29%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $490k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HT
    HOLY TRINITY POLISH MISSION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $644k
  • FO
    Federation of Polish Medical Organizat
    3× · 2023–2025 · $245k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2024 · $104k

Funded once

  • ES
    EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $125k
  • PA
    POLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue +57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Polish American Congress Charitable Foundation

The Polish American Congress Charitable Foundation is a public charity that provides charitable, educational and medical aid to those in need in Poland and in the United States.

International
2
Polish American Chamber of Commerce

The polish american chamber of commerce is dedicated to fostering its members' business interests, educating and building relations.

Community Improvement
3
Society for the Arts Ltd

Promotion of Central Eastern European Culture

Arts & Culture
4
Jozef Pilsudski Institute Ofamerica for Research in the Modern History

Collecting historical books, publishing books, organizing lectures, providing scientific help to historians, digitization of documents and archives for preservation and study.

—
5
Polish Institute of Arts & Sciences of America Inc

Provide education about poland

—
6
Polish Cultural Institute

Museum of Polish Culture, Arts, and Education

Arts & Culture
7
Polish-American Foundation of Connecticut Inc

The polish-american foundation of ct, inc. seeks to enhance the cultural and economic development of the community by sponsoring cultural and educational programs, activities, improving access to and providing social and workforce…

Arts & Culture
8
Fryderyk Chopin Polish School

School of polish language and tradition The school taught polish language and polish tradition to approximately 970 students

—
9
Chopin Theatre Productions Nfp

To promote enlightened civic discourse through a diverse range of artistic offerings. We execute our mission by applying prudent business practices without compromising our programming diversity or artistic excellence.

Arts & Culture
10
American School of Warsaw Foundation Inc

The foundation was formed for the purpose of facilitating the operation and support of the american school of warsaw.

International
11
Polanki Incorporated

To Promote Polish Culture and Heritage to Non Polish people of Greater Milwaukee Area and beyond

Arts & Culture
12
Patron Polish American Educational Association Inc

Educational related to polish

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Kosciuszko Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Chopin Society of Atlanta Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY TRINITY POLISH MISSION: $643,680 · OtherHOLY TRINITY POLISH MISSIONFederation of Polish Medical Organizat: $245,000 · OtherFederation of Polish Medical OrganizatCharities Aid Foundation America (CAFA: $143,263 · OtherCharities Aid Foundation America (CAFAEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $125,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONAcademy of Music of the Paderewski Sym: $106,250 · OtherAcademy of Music of the Paderewski SymIndividual grant recipient: $103,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUNDS AND NOTES FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Other+6 more: $113,100 · Other+6 moreTHE KOSCIUSZKO FOUNDATION INC: $54,500 · InternationalGIFT FROM THE HEART FUNDATION INC: $39,610 · InternationalTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $75,000 · EducationCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $68,650 · PhilanthropyPolish Museum of America: $40,000 · Arts & CultureChopin Society of Atlanta Inc: $5,450 · Arts & CulturePOLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Human Services
Other$1,559,793International$94,110Education$75,000Philanthropy$68,650Arts & Culture$45,450Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $68,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KOSCIUSZKO FOUNDATION INC: $54,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPolish Museum of America: $40,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetGIFT FROM THE HEART FUNDATION INC: $39,610 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetWOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE KOSCIUSZKO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Polish Museum of America ↗
  • Who funds GIFT FROM THE HEART FUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds POLISH AMERICAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Chopin Society of Atlanta Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

I J Roman Family FoundationCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: I J Roman Family Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert Kyts and Jadwiga Roguska-Kyts funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert Kyts and Jadwiga Roguska-Kyts. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert Kyts and Jadwiga Roguska-Kyts’ filings →

    More from the funding graph