Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert K Scripps Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$84kEnvironment$27kHealth$26kInternational$20kFood & Nutrition$19kAnimals$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kReligion$11kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,600
Median grant
7
States reached
$435k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC$7,000
FAMILY OF NEW PALTZ$2,500
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$2,000
EARTH JUSTICE$1,600
NATIONAL DEFENSE COUNCIL$1,600
Individual grant recipient$1,600
THE FOOD DEPOT$1,600
GREENPEACE$1,600
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$1,500
VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
TEACHERS COLLEGE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$1,000
CHANNEL 13WNET$1,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%THE FOOD DEPOT: $2k → 12%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $14k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $2k → 12%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $7k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $2k → 12%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $7k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $2k → 12%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $7k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $2k → 12%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $7k → 12%WORLD FOOD PROGRAM USA: $1k → 14%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $7k → 12%THE FOOD DEPOT: $2k → 12%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $7k → 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%THE FOOD DEPOT: $1k → 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%OASIS HAVEN FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN INC: $7k → 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%THE FOOD DEPOT: $1k → 12%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$228k · 25 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
18

Total granted

$228k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+29%

Still filing today

72%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalFood & NutritionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $63k · revenue +143%
  • THE FOOD DEPOT
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +84%
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $11k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • BO
    BEINVENIDOS OUTREACH INC
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • CF
    CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +67%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
3
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
4
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
5
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
6
The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…

Animals
7
Sweet Farm Foundation

Sweet farm is the world's first nonprofit sanctuary to address the devastating impact that factory farming has on climate change from the perspective of animals, plants, and the planet. we must first understand how these pieces are…

Animals
8
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
9
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
10
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
11
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
12
Floresta Usa Incorporated

Plant with purpose, a christian nonprofit organization, reverses deforestation and poverty around the world by transforming the lives of the rural poor. we do this through: - watershed restoration & regenerative agriculture - savings…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Friends of the World Food Program Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Paltz Central School District Foundation for Student Enhancement. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY OF NEW PALTZ: $20,000 · OtherFAMILY OF NEW PALTZPLANNED PARENTHOOD: $15,250 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $11,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESCATHOLIC CHARITIES USA: $9,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES USACHANNEL 13WNET: $8,500 · OtherCHANNEL 13WNETTOGETHER RISING: $4,000 · OtherBOY'S AND GIRL'S CLUB OF ULSTER COUNTY INC: $8,000 · OtherBOY'S AND GIRL'S CLUB OF ULSTER COUNTY INCFRESH AIR FUND: $4,000 · Other+19 more: $30,550 · Other+19 moreOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $63,000 · Human ServicesOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN…THE FOOD DEPOT: $13,550 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOTCOVENANT HOUSE: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE+2 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR: $4,000 · InternationalSUDAN RELIEF FUND INC: $3,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 · InternationalNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,950 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $2,900 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,350 · Environment+1 more: $100 · EnvironmentSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $4,000 · AnimalsULSTER COUNTY SPCA: $4,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $2,000 · AnimalsSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,600 · AnimalsAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,350 · AnimalsNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $1,000 · AnimalsST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 · HealthTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthTeachers College Columbia University: $6,000 · EducationNEW PALTZ CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT ENHANCEMENT: $3,000 · Education
Other$110,300Human Services$83,550International$18,000Environment$15,300Animals$13,950Health$11,000Education$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC: $63,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $13,550 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $10,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBOY'S AND GIRL'S CLUB OF ULSTER COUNTY INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTeachers College Columbia University: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetULSTER COUNTY SPCA: $4,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER RISING: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW PALTZ CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT ENHANCEMENT: $3,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetSUDAN RELIEF FUND INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $2,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREENPEACE INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO LAND CONSERVANCY: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC: $1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC: $1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OASIS - A HAVEN FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOY'S AND GIRL'S CLUB OF ULSTER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SEA SHEPHERD CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds ULSTER COUNTY SPCA ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds TOGETHER RISING ↗
  • Who funds NEW PALTZ CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION FOR STUDENT ENHANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds SUDAN RELIEF FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENPEACE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds RAINFOREST ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert K Scripps Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert K Scripps Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert K Scripps Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph