Skip to content
Robert J Louie Memorial Fund at a glance

· Public charity

Robert J Louie Memorial Fund

Charitable work in raising funds for scholarship and other nonprofit activities.

$306k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$656kHealth$539kArts & Culture$516kCommunity Improvement$250kYouth Development$213kFood & Nutrition$100kPhilanthropy$70kPublic Safety & Disaster$65kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $295,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $305,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$260k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY$50,000
COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SF$50,000
CHINESE FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTIO$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$35,000
APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES$30,000
CHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPME$20,000
ON LOK$10,000
CHINESE HOSPITAL$10,000
CHINATOWN YMCA$10,000
GUM MOON$10,000
CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING$10,000
CAAMKQED$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $595k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $35k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%YMCA - BUCHANAN: $20k → 10%YMCA - BUCHANAN: $10k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%SELF HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $50k → 10%YMCA-CHINATOWN: $20k → 10%CHINATOWN YMCA: $10k → 10%CAMERON HOUSE: $10k → 10%YMCA-CHINATOWN: $10k → 10%CAMERON HOUSE: $10k → 10%CHINATOWN YMCA: $10k → 10%GUM MOON: $10k → 10%CHINATOWN YMCA: $10k → 10%CAMERON HOUSE: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 19 repeat orgs$251k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
13

Total granted

$2.3M
$231k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+32%

Still filing today

84%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +72%
  • CM
    CHINATOWN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2018–2023 · $250k · revenue +107%
  • AF
    APA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES
    7× · 2017–2024 · $156k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • YC
    YOUTH COLLABORATIVE CHINATOWN
    one grant, 2021 · $48k
  • CY
    COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +234%
  • CT
    CULTURE TO COLOR
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Filipino Cultural Center
Arts & Culture
2
Japantown Cultural Society
Education
3
Asian Pacific Islander Cultural Center

The center promotes the artistic and organizational growth of the San Francisco Bay Areas Asian Pacific arts community by organizing and presenting the annual United States of Asian America Festival

Arts & Culture
4
Chinatown Media and Arts Collaborative

Own and operate a collaborative platform anchored in san francisco chinatown that celebrates, explores, and supports leading and pioneering creative experessions at the intersection of community, culture, art and media.

Human Services
5
San Francisco Guzheng Music Society
Arts & Culture
6
Api Cultural CenterInc Oakland Asian Cultural Center

Oakland Asian Cultural Center builds vibrant communities through Asian and Pacific Islander American (APIA) arts and cultural programs that foster intergenerational and cross-cultural dialogue, cultural identity, collaborations, and social…

Recreation & Sports
7
Asian Art Foundation

To introduce classic chinese culture to the residents of san francisco bay area; to promote ancient asian arts to san francisco bay area.

Arts & Culture
8
Center for Advanced China Research
—
9
Asian American Center of Santa Clara

The mission of Asian American Community Center of Santa Clara County (AASC) is to provide health, human, and economic development services to low income families and individuals to enable them to become actively participating citizens in…

Human Services
10
Monterey Bay Chinese Association

Provide Chinese Culture and Help to Advance social, economic well-being of Chinese American at Monterey Bay, California.

Arts & Culture
11
Chinese American Womens Benevolent Association
Philanthropy
12
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Donaldina Cameron House; the most unlike its peers is Community Youth Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHINESE FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTIO: $389,500 · OtherCHINESE FOR AFFIRMATIVE ACTIOCHINATOWN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION: $250,385 · OtherCHINATOWN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATIONAPA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $155,500 · OtherAPA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICESCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $135,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCOCSI LANDMARK INC: $75,000 · OtherCSI LANDMARK INCST ANTHONY FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherST ANTHONY FOUNDATIONYOUTH COLLABORATIVE CHINATOWN: $47,900 · Other+6 more: $105,200 · Other+6 moreSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $400,000 · Human ServicesSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLYYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $90,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSO…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $65,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cros…DONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE: $30,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $125,000 · Arts & CultureCHINESE HISTORICA…Center for Asian American Media: $100,000 · Arts & CultureCenter for Asian …FOR-SITE Foundation: $85,000 · Arts & CultureFOR-SITE Foundati…CHINESE CULTURE FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25,000 · Arts & CultureCHINESE CULTURE F…+5 more: $52,400 · Arts & Culture+5 moreCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $130,000 · Housing & ShelterCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $70,500 · Food & NutritionTHE ASSOCIATION OF CHINESE TEACHERS: $35,000 · EducationSprouts Chef Training: $15,000 · EducationON LOK INC: $39,250 · HealthCHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER: $30,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,228,485Human Services$595,000Arts & Culture$387,400Housing & Shelter$130,000Food & Nutrition$70,500Education$50,000Health$49,250Youth Development$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $400,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHINATOWN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION: $250,385 over 6y, 12% of budgetAPA FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $155,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO: $135,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $130,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHINESE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $125,000 over 3y, 4.9% of budgetCenter for Asian American Media: $100,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $90,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOR-SITE Foundation: $85,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND: $70,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $65,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetON LOK INC: $39,250 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ASSOCIATION OF CHINESE TEACHERS: $35,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetCOMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER: $30,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetDONALDINA CAMERON HOUSE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCHINESE CULTURE FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetAngel Island Immigration Station Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetSprouts Chef Training: $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetEth-Noh-Tec Creations: $12,400 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetWomens Division Christian Service Gum Moon Residence Hall: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBerkeley Art Center Association: $10,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetASIAN ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLARION PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetASIAN AMERICAN WOMEN ARTISTS ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetCHINESE HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jessie Cheng Charitab…The San Francisco Fou…San Francisco Associa…Asian Pacific FundMcNabb FoundationChinese Community Hea…Silicon Valley Commun…Raymond and Joanne Li…Cathay Bank FoundationThe Zellerbach Family…Stupski FoundationUnited Way of the Bay…
Jessie Cheng Charitable FoundationCA28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jessie Cheng Charitable Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · San Francisco Association of Realtors Foundation · Asian Pacific Fund · McNabb Foundation · Chinese Community Health Care Association · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Raymond and Joanne Lin Foundation · Cathay Bank Foundation · The Zellerbach Family Foundation · Stupski Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert J Louie Memorial Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert J Louie Memorial Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert J Louie Memorial Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Robert J Louie Memorial Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert J Louie Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home