Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Robert and Suzanne Kittredge Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Recreation & Sports$32kEducation$32kReligion$14kHealth$13kPhilanthropy$6kEnvironment$3kArts & Culture$3kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$1,700
Median grant
3
States reached
$90k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY$11,750
SHOOTING TOUCH$3,000
GRANT WILLIAMS FAMILY FOUNDATION$1,700
CAPE COD SYNAGOGUE$1,000
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAPE ABILITIES: $500 → 8%CAPE ABILITIES: $250 → 8%CAPE ABILITIES: $250 → 8%CAPE ABILITIES: $200 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
IA
OH
NJ
RI
CA
MD
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$89k · 12 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$89k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+16%

Still filing today

50%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyEnvironmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    SHOOTING TOUCH INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +80%
  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2024 · $28k · revenue +40%
  • CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $3k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • OS
    OCEAN SOLE AFRICA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -4%
  • 7F
    7UICE FOUNDATION FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • AW
    A WISH COME TRUE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +37%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
2
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
3
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
4
Access to Advanced Health Institute

Aahi is a nonprofit biotech research institute, bringing together the best experts, technologies, and platforms to create accessible, high-quality products and solutions for harnessing the immune system to alleviate disease.

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
Care Transformation Collaborative of Ri

The mission of ctc-ri is to support the continuing transformation of primary care in rhode island as the foundation of an ever-improving integrated, accessible, affordable, and equitable health care system. ctc-ri brings together critical…

Health
7
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
10
Food Allergy Science Initiative Inc

To accelerate the development of breakthrough discoveries that will transform the lives of people living with food allergies.

11
American College of Radiology

The american college of radiology (acr) is organized to advance radiology science, practice and access, improve quality and safety, provide continuing education for radiology and allied professionals, and achieve better outcomes through…

Health
12
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Autism Speaks Inc and the most unlike its peers is Compassionate Care Als Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAPE COD SYNAGOGUE INC — $14,063 · OtherCAPE COD SYNAGOGUE INCJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $5,204 · OtherJOHN HOPKINS UNIVERSITYUNIVERITY OF BUFFALO SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY DEPT OF ENDODONTICS — $2,000 · OtherUNIVERITY OF BUFFALO SCHOOL OF DEN…GRANT WILLIAMS FAMILY FOUNDATION — $1,700 · Other7UICE FOUNDATION FUND — $1,500 · OtherCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $1,350 · OtherA WISH COME TRUE INC — $1,200 · Other+11 more — $5,500 · Other+11 moreSHOOTING TOUCH INC — $31,650 · Recreation & SportsSHOOTING TOUCH INCJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $27,739 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $3,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITYJEWISH FEDERATION OF CAPE COD INC — $3,000 · PhilanthropyCAPE COD TIMES NEIGHBORS FUND INC — $450 · PhilanthropyHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC — $200 · PhilanthropyCompassionate Care ALS Inc — $1,400 · Human ServicesCAPE ABILITIES INC — $1,200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $250 · Human ServicesOCEAN SOLE AFRICA INC — $2,500 · EnvironmentMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $300 · EnvironmentRRS-OASIS INC — $1,000 · AnimalsBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $500 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $100 · Health
Other$32,517Recreation & Sports$31,650Education$30,739Philanthropy$3,650Human Services$2,850Environment$2,800Animals$1,000Health$600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSHOOTING TOUCH INC — $31,650 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY — $27,739 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CAPE COD INC — $3,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN SOLE AFRICA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc — $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA WISH COME TRUE INC — $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPE ABILITIES INC — $1,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRRS-OASIS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE COD TIMES NEIGHBORS FUND INC — $450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEHEALTH MASSACHUSETTS INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHOOTING TOUCH INC
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CAPE COD INC
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds OCEAN SOLE AFRICA INC
  • Who funds Compassionate Care ALS Inc
  • Who funds A WISH COME TRUE INC
  • Who funds CAPE ABILITIES INC
  • Who funds RRS-OASIS INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds CAPE COD TIMES NEIGHBORS FUND INC
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds HOPEHEALTH MASSACHUSETTS INC
  • Who funds HIRSHBERG FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANC
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cape Cod Foundation IncMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cape Cod Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Robert and Suzanne Kittredge Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Cape Abilities Inc81% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University12% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Robert and Suzanne Kittredge Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Robert and Suzanne Kittredge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph