Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert and Kathryn P Fagliarone Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$185kHousing & Shelter$50kHuman Services$16kReligion$11kHealth$9kInternational$4kPhilanthropy$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,100
Median grant
3
States reached
$203k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH NAPLES BAPTIST CHURCH$5,000
MISCELLANEOUS CONTRIBUTIONS 1000 AND UNDER$1,100
LEMOYNE COLLEGE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 14%RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 14%RESCUE MISSION: $2k → 14%RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 11%RESCUE MISSION: $1k → 14%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 11%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 11%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 11%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $1k → 11%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $500 → 11%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Robert and Kathryn P Fagliarone Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 19% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 15%.

Robert and Kathryn P Fagliarone Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 16 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$275k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
+26%

Still filing today

44%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterInternationalPhilanthropyHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    Le Moyne College
    8× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +23%
  • TR
    THE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $10k · revenue +57%
  • SM
    ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $9k · revenue +262%

Funded once

  • M5
    MISCELLANEOUS 500 AND UNDER
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • TJ
    THE JOSEPH E PETER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +26% · 91% of their budget
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Light of Life Ministries Inc

Light of life transforms lives through the love of christ by providing food, shelter, and hope to men, women, and children experiencing homelessness, poverty, or addiction to restore them as healthy members of our community.

Human Services
2
House of Mercy
Human Services
3
The Salem Mission Inc

Lifebridge's mission is to offer men and women the opportunities they need to end their homelessness. we believe that the way to solve this crisis, one person at a time, is to provide housing with supportive services, to encourage personal…

Human Services
4
Saint Joseph's Mercy Care Services Inc

We, saint joseph's health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. honoring the heritage and advancing the ministry of the sisters of…

—
5
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
7
Sunday Breakfast Rescue Mission

A living legacy of john wanamaker, philly house's mission is to open their doors every day with a welcoming spirit of christian compassion, walking alongside the homeless, hungry, and hurting of philadelphia so that they may experience the…

Human Services
8
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Pgh

Catholic charities serves to not only meet the immediate needs of the vulnerable within our communities but to provide solutions that embrace a path to stability for those we are privileged to serve. catholic charities is the primary…

Human Services
9
Jefferson Street Baptist Center Inc

Re:center ministries reconciles homeless and hurting people to god, family and community by the power of christ in partnership with the local church.

Religion
10
City Mission Society Inc

See schedule o description of our mission and vision.

Human Services
11
City Mission of Schenectady

The Mission is dedicated to sharing the Gospel of Jesus Christ in word and deed. The ministries of the City Mission of Schenectady seek to comprehensively meet the needs of the poor in a manner that dignifies and strengthens the…

—
12
The Young Women's Christian Association of Yonkers

Ywca is dedicated to empowering women and promoting peace, health, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Rescue Mission Alliance of Syracuse; the most unlike its peers is The Joseph E Peter Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Le Moyne College: $179,717 · EducationLe Moyne College+1 more: $5,000 · EducationNORTH NAPLES BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherNORTH NAPLES BAPTIST CH…MISCELLANEOUS UNDER 500: $9,550 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS UNDER 500SALVATION ARMY: $9,500 · OtherSALVATION ARMYHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $6,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYFT MYERS RESCUE MISSION: $6,000 · OtherFT MYERS RESCUE MISSIONST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $5,500 · OtherST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOS…MISCELLANEOUS CONTRIBUTIONS 1000 AND UNDER: $2,475 · OtherMISCELLANEOUS 500 AND UNDER: $2,000 · OtherGALISANO CANCER CENTER: $2,000 · Other+5 more: $4,000 · Other+5 moreST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $9,000 · Housing & ShelterCAFE OF LIFE INC: $8,900 · Housing & ShelterTHE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE: $9,500 · Human ServicesLIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesYESU NI BWANA INC: $4,000 · InternationalTHE JOSEPH E PETER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 · Health
Education$184,717Other$57,525Housing & Shelter$17,900Human Services$15,500International$4,000Philanthropy$1,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLe Moyne College: $179,717 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE: $9,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCAFE OF LIFE INC: $8,900 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC: $6,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMERCYWORKSINCORPORATED: $5,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYESU NI BWANA INC: $4,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetTHE JOSEPH E PETER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 91% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Le Moyne College ↗
  • Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION ALLIANCE OF SYRACUSE ↗
  • Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds CAFE OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCYWORKSINCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds YESU NI BWANA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JOSEPH E PETER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert and Kathryn P Fagliarone Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert and Kathryn P Fagliarone Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert and Kathryn P Fagliarone’s filings →

    More from the funding graph