Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Karen Rishwain Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$306kHealth$200kArts & Culture$175kReligion$115kPublic Benefit$105kHousing & Shelter$64kEmployment$40kHuman Services$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$273k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIPP CHARTER SCHOOLS$25,000
MAMAS HOUSE MINISTRIES$25,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$15,000
VCE SHCOLARSHIP FUND$10,000
ST BASILS GREEK ORTHODOX CHURCH$5,000
SACRED HEART CHURCH$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$574k · 13 repeat orgs$490k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$574k
$432k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+42%

Still filing today

38%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    7× · 2018–2024 · $172k · revenue +77%
  • RM
    RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL
    4× · 2018–2023 · $50k · revenue +125%
  • MH
    MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22
    2× · 2019–2025 · $26k · revenue +123%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +132%
  • PO
    PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +32%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CLARA
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Agnes Medical Center

We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
2
Marin General Hospital

To be the destination for health and healing in the north bay.

Health
3
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
4
Sutter Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
Memorial Hospital Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

—
6
Sutter Coast Hospital

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
7
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
8
Sansum Clinic

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
St John's Healthcare Foundation

St. john's healthcare foundation (oxnard and camarillo) is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization that raises, manages, and distributes funds on behalf of st. john's regional medical center and st. john's hospital camarillo. we believe that…

—
10
St Mary's Medical Center Foundation

St. mary's medical center foundation exists to support the mission of dignity health dba, st. mary's medical center. we do this through our encouragement of charitable giving, our stewardship of donor gifts, and our own grant making, which…

Health
11
Santos Manuel Student Union of Csusb

The student union, through its programs and facilities, is a focal point of the campus through assisting in the retention and development of students while encouraging a deeper understanding and appreciation of cultural pluralism, gender…

Education
12
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Americans for Prosperity; the most unlike its peers is San Joaquin Partnership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE MCCALLUM THEATER: $114,500 · OtherTHE MCCALLUM THEATERUNIVERSITY OF SANTA CLARA: $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SANTA CLARAST MARYS INTERFAITH DINING HALL: $75,000 · OtherST MARYS INTERFAITH DINING HALLSACRED HEART SCHOOL: $30,400 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLREADY TO WORK FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherKIPP CHARTER SCHOOLS: $25,000 · OtherST JOSEPHS FOUNDATION OF STOCKTON: $25,000 · OtherST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 · Other+21 more: $120,350 · Other+21 moreEisenhower Medical Center: $171,500 · HealthEisenhower Medical C…MAYO CLINIC: $25,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC+1 more: $500 · HealthPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $100,000 · EducationPRESIDENT-BOARD …RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL: $50,000 · EducationRANCHO MIRAGE WR…A TAVOLA TOGETHER FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationAMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY: $100,000 · Community ImprovementAMERICANS …READY TO WORK: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterStockton Shelter For The Homeless: $14,100 · Housing & ShelterMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $26,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesLIVING DESERT THE: $13,000 · Environment
Other$535,250Health$197,000Education$157,500Community Improvement$100,000Housing & Shelter$64,100Human Services$27,000Environment$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $171,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADY TO WORK: $50,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetRANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL: $50,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $26,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetStockton Shelter For The Homeless: $14,100 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $13,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,100 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetA TAVOLA TOGETHER FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROTTS OF FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE: $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetGOLDEN STATE GOLF TOUR ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds READY TO WORK ↗
  • Who funds RANCHO MIRAGE WRITERS FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22 ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Stockton Shelter For The Homeless ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds SAN JOAQUIN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds A TAVOLA TOGETHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROTTS OF FRIENDS ANIMAL RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN STATE GOLF TOUR ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JOSEPH'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Lewy Body Dementia Association Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cortopassi Family FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Karen Rishwain Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Karen Rishwain Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Robert & Karen Rishwain Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Robert & Karen Rishwain Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert & Karen Rishwain Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph