· Private foundation
Robert and Jean Rogers Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $41k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NASSAU SUFFOLK SERVICES FOR AUTISM | $30,000 |
| GWEN L KOSINSKI FOUNDATION | $10,500 |
| ELIJA FARM | $6,000 |
| THE CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD | $6,000 |
| WINTERS CENTER FOR AUTISM | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $1,500 |
| ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $1,500 |
| GODS LOVE WE DELIVER | $1,000 |
| FRENCHMANS RESERVE CHARITABLE FOUND | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +97% since the first grant, against +61% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NSNASSAU SUFFOLK SERVICES FOR THE AUTISTIC INC9× · 2017–2025 · $233k · revenue +66%
- WCWINTERS CENTER FOR AUTISM6× · 2020–2025 · $67k · revenue +212%
- GLGWEN L KOSINSKI FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $44k · revenue +232%
Funded once
GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICESgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +33%- HHHUNTER'S HOUSE OF HOPEone grant, 2021 · $5k
- USUNSUNG SIBLINGS FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +118%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of eden ii programs is to support people with autism throughout their lives to achieve their full potential through service, science, and passion.
The center's mission is to help children and adults with differing abilities achieve their dreams by overcoming barriers to living, working, learning & enjoying recreational opportunities in the community of their choice.
We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Amid the proliferation of advice about treatment options for autism, the ability to access accurate information about research-validated approaches is critically important to those seeking effective treatment.
Mercy home provides essential services for children and adults with developmental disabilities. mercy home's mission is to ensure the quality of life for persons with developmental disabilities through the recognition of each person's…
The mission of eden autism services is to improve the lives of people with autism: one individual at a time; one family at a time; one community at a time.
The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…
The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…
The school's mission is to create hope and opportunity for children with autism, their families, caregivers, and the community at large utilizing the most effective, scientifically-validated educational and treatment programs available. we…
Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…
To significantly improve the lives of people with down syndrome through research, medical care, education and advocacy. an important part of this mission is to support the global affiliate organizations that we helped establish and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Developmental Disabilities Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Unsung Siblings Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NASSAU SUFFOLK SERVICES FOR THE AUTISTIC INC ↗
- Who funds WINTERS CENTER FOR AUTISM ↗
- Who funds GWEN L KOSINSKI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ELIJA FARM INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL SCLERODERMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Autism Communities Inc ↗
- Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES ↗
- Who funds UNSUNG SIBLINGS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds Mercy Haven Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Robert and Jean Rogers Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.