Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Gwen Tyler Charitable Foundatio

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.3MHealth$1.2MReligion$689kRecreation & Sports$533kHousing & Shelter$201kArts & Culture$60kEmployment$35kEnvironment$32kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $458k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$9.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTCARE FOUNDATION$1,000,000
COWLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$200,000
PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI$100,000
MCPHERSON COLLEGE$100,000
FIRST UNITED METH CHURCH$57,520
SALINA EDUCATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE MUSEU$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
GIRL SCOUTS OF KS HEARTLAND$7,500
EAGLE NEST$7,500
COWLEY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$7,500
PHOENIX CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$5,000
CASA OF COWLEY COUNTY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PHOENIX CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $25k → 5%MCPHERSON COLLEGE: $100k → 10%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR CLOUD COUN: $200k → 13%SALINA EDUCATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE MUSEU: $20k → 13%BARTLETT ARBORETURM: $10k → 13%GIRL SCOUTS OF KS HEARTLAND: $8k → 16%COWLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $200k → 16%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $250k → 18%MCPHERSON COLLEGE: $100k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $50k → 13%SALINA EDUCATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE MUSEU: $20k → 13%COWLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $200k → 16%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI: $100k → 18%MCPHERSON COLLEGE: $100k → 10%CONCORDIA LIONS CLUB: $8k → 13%SALINA EDUCATIONAL AUTO MUSEUM: $20k → 13%COWLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $200k → 16%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATI: $100k → 18%CLOUD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUN: $7k → 13%SALINA EDUCATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE MUSEU: $20k → 13%QUIVARA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERI: $100k → 16%COWLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $200k → 16%PITTSBURGE STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 18%WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTCARE FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 16%PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 18%WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTCARE FOUNDATION: $501k → 16%WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIO: $375k → 16%WILLIAM NEWTON HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIO: $330k → 16%LEGACY FOUNDATION: $275k → 16%CITY OF WINFIELD KANSAS: $150k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $108k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $100k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $100k → 16%SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $90k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $85k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $63k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $59k → 16%FIRST UNITED METH CHURCH: $58k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $54k → 16%CITY OF WINFIELD KANSAS: $25k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $25k → 16%WINFIELD COMMUNITY FOOD PANTRY: $20k → 16%EAGLES NEST: $10k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 16%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 16%EAGLE NEST: $8k → 16%COWLEY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 12 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
15

Total granted

$4.5M
$1.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
7%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsEmploymentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WN
    William Newton Healthcare Foundation Inc
    4× · 2021–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +340% · 44% of their budget
  • PS
    PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $200k · revenue +24%
  • CC
    COWLEY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY
    3× · 2018–2025 · $15k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • LF
    LEGACY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $275k
  • CF
    COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR CLOUD COUN
    one grant, 2022 · $200k
  • CO
    CITY OF WINFIELD KANSAS
    one grant, 2020 · $175k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mississippi College

Mississippi college is a private, co-educational, comprehensive university of liberal arts and sciences and professional studies dedicated to the pursuit of academic excellence. founded in 1826, mississippi college is the oldest…

Education
2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
4
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
5
Nebraska Wesleyan University

Nebraska wesleyan university is an academic community dedicated to intellectual and personal growth within the context of a liberal arts education and in an environment of christian concern.

Education
6
Central Christian College of Kansas

Central christian college of kansas is a four-year, non-profit liberal arts college with the primary mission of offering a christ-centered education for character.

Education
7
Clarkson University

Clarkson university is an independent, nationally recognized technological university whose faculty of teacher-scholars aspires to offer superior instruction and engage in high-quality research and scholarship in engineering, business,…

Education
8
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
9
West Virginia Wesleyan College

West virginia wesleyan college challenges its students to a life-long commitment to develop their intellectual, ethical, spiritual, and leadership potential and to set and uphold standards of excellence. firmly rooted in the liberal arts…

Education
10
Missouri Western State University Foundation Inc

The missouri western state university foundation is a not-for-profit charitable organization that functions solely to support the mission of missouri western state university, as stated in the university's mission statement. the foundation…

—
11
Cottey College

Cottey college, an independent liberal arts college, educates women to be contributing members of a global society through a challenging curriculum and a dynamic campus experience. in our diverse and supportive environment, women develop…

Education
12
Cornell College

Cornell college offers an innovative and rigorous learning community where faculty and staff collaborate with students to develop the intellectual curiosity, creativity and moral courage necessary for a lifetime of learning and engaged…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Southwestern College; the most unlike its peers is Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

William Newton Healthcare Foundation Inc: $2,205,850 · HealthWilliam Newton Healthcare Foundation Inc+2 more: $10,000 · HealthFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $613,517 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $275,000 · OtherPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITYLEGACY FOUNDATION: $275,000 · OtherLEGACY FOUNDATIONCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR CLOUD COUN: $200,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR CLOUD COUNCITY OF WINFIELD KANSAS: $175,000 · OtherCITY OF WINFIELD KANSASQUIVARA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERI: $100,000 · Other+16 more: $337,843 · Other+16 moreCOWLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $800,000 · EducationCOWLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $300,000 · EducationMCPHERSON COLLEGEPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 · EducationPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY F…THE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $90,000 · EducationTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGEEAGLE NEST INC: $17,500 · EmploymentCOWLEY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $14,500 · AnimalsCASA OF COWLEY COUNTY INC CASA OF COWLEY COUNTY INC: $2,500 · Civil Rights
Health$2,215,850Other$1,976,360Education$1,390,000Employment$17,500Animals$14,500Civil Rights$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWilliam Newton Healthcare Foundation Inc: $2,205,850 over 4y, 44% of budgetCOWLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $800,000 over 4y, 12% of budgetMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $300,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $200,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE: $90,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEAGLE NEST INC: $17,500 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetCOWLEY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $14,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASA OF COWLEY COUNTY INC CASA OF COWLEY COUNTY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds William Newton Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COWLEY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCPHERSON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURG STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE NEST INC ↗
  • Who funds COWLEY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF COWLEY COUNTY INC CASA OF COWLEY COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Legacy a Regional Community FoundationKS17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Legacy a Regional Community Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Gwen Tyler Charitable Foundatio funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Gwen Tyler Charitable Foundatio. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert & Gwen Tyler Charitable Foundatio’s filings →

    More from the funding graph