Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert & Ellen Bach Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2019
8
Grants FY2019
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Arts & Culture$21kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$7kAnimals$4kHealth$4kEnvironment$3kFood & Nutrition$3kReligion$3kOther$0
02FY2019 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$181k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL AFRICAN MUSEUM$5,000
SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS$1,800
GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION$1,800
ST ANTHONY OF PADUA$1,500
THE WAREHOUSE THEATRE$1,000
WESTCHESTER LAND TRUST$1,000
PICKENS MEALS ON WHEELS$1,000
HANDS ACROSS THE SEA$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $2k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $2k → 10%SOUTHEASTERN GUIDE DOGS: $1k → 10%THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$45k · 9 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
7

Total granted

$45k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+3%

Still filing today

56%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEnvironmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +11%
  • SG
    Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +146%
  • GD
    GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $4k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • P
    PALAZZOMARCHETTIIT
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • CC
    CHARLESTON COMMUNITY SAILING INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +132%
  • SA
    ST ANTHONYS CHURCH-SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Columbia Childrens Theatre

Inspired by the intelligence and emotional wisdom of young people, we create professional theatre for youth and families, foster inclusive community, and nurture meaningful learning through the arts. We provide these experiences through…

Arts & Culture
2
New York Therapy Animals Inc

Healing and education through a human/animal connection.

Animals
3
South Carolina Children's Theatre

Empowering and inspiring a new generation of changemakers through theatre. at scct, we define a changemaker as: someone who has empathy for others and is driven to make the world a better place. someone who is inquisitive, open minded, and…

Arts & Culture
4
America's Vetdogs the Veterans K-9 Corps Inc

To assist disabled veterans, active military personnel, first responders with disabilities, and those who have served our country honorably to live with dignity and independence. america's vetdogs trains and places guide dogs for…

Public Benefit
5
Charleston Stage Company Inc

Charleston stage's vision is to be a leading professional theater company, engaging the broad community through high quality productions, with leading artists, and excellent production values. the organization provides the community access…

Arts & Culture
6
Workshop Theatre of South Carolina

Our mission is to cultivate a vibrant space where the arts are celebrated, all voices are amplified, and the power of live theatre brings people together. at workshop theatre, we are dedicated to enriching our community by providing access…

Arts & Culture
7
The Royal National Theatre

Theatre can lead to extraordinary moments of shared imagination. it enables us to stand in anothers shoes to better understand ourselves and the world around us. it shows us who we are, who we have been, who we could be. the nt delivers on…

Arts & Culture
8
Puppies Behind Bars Inc

Puppies behind bars trains incarcerated individuals to raise service dogs for wounded war veterans and first responders, facility dogs for police departments, and explosive-detecton canines for law enforcement.

Human Services
9
Freedom Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc

Breed, raise, train and place guide dogs with visually impaired people, mainly on the east coast of the U.S., at no cost to the users of the guide dogs

Human Services
10
Sundog Theater Inc

Sundog Theatre is a performing arts organization that engages audiences and artists onstage through contemporary and original theater. In the general education classroom, we help student curricula come to life through theater, dance, music…

Arts & Culture
11
Courthouse Dogs Foundation

The mission of Courthouse Dogs Foundation is to promote justice with compassion partnering with professionally trained facility dogs to provide support to everyone in the justice system. Most of these dogs are utilized to support children…

Crime & Legal
12
Pawsitivity

Train and place service dogs at no cost with U.S. military veterans with PTSD and other disabilities to increase independence.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Warehouse Theatre. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INTERNATIONAL AFRICAN MUSEUM: $10,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL AFRICAN MUSEUMREGINA PACIS SCHOOL: $8,100 · OtherREGINA PACIS SCHOOLHUDSON RIVER COMMUNITY SAILING SCH: $5,000 · OtherHUDSON RIVER COMMUNITY SAILING SCHGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,300 · OtherGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INCPALAZZOMARCHETTIIT: $2,500 · OtherPALAZZOMARCHETTIITPICKENS MEALS ON WHEELS: $2,500 · OtherPICKENS MEALS ON WHEELSST ANTHONY OF PADUA: $1,500 · Other+3 more: $2,700 · Other+3 moreCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC: $4,500 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM…THE WAREHOUSE THEATRE: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WAREHOUSE THE…THE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE 52ND STREET P…Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: $4,300 · Human ServicesSoutheast…THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Human ServicesTHE GOOD …Westchester Land Trust Inc: $3,000 · EnvironmentCHARLESTON COMMUNITY SAILING INC: $1,500 · Recreation & SportsHANDS ACROSS THE SEA INC: $500 · Health
Other$36,600Arts & Culture$8,500Human Services$4,800Environment$3,000Recreation & Sports$1,500Health$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSoutheastern Guide Dogs Inc: $4,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $4,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWestchester Land Trust Inc: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WAREHOUSE THEATRE: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHARLESTON COMMUNITY SAILING INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHANDS ACROSS THE SEA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE UPSTATE INC ↗
  • Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds Westchester Land Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE WAREHOUSE THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON COMMUNITY SAILING INC ↗
  • Who funds THE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HANDS ACROSS THE SEA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT12.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert & Ellen Bach Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert & Ellen Bach Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert & Ellen Bach’s filings →

More from the funding graph