Skip to content

· Private foundation

Robert and Anna Drury Family Foundation Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
83
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$806kHealth$616kReligion$529kFood & Nutrition$336kEducation$299kCommunity Improvement$164kRecreation & Sports$76kAnimals$72kOther$0
02FY2025 · 83 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k56 grants · $177k
  • $10k–50k21 grants · $287k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $575k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST VINCENT DEPAUL - CAPITAL CAMPAIGN$200,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH$125,000
ST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
ST FRANCIS FOUNDATION-MOBILE WELLNESS$50,000
NEWMAN CENTER OF SEMO$50,000
GLOBAL CATHOLICISM FOUNDATION - ECT$50,000
NDHS EDU FUND FOUNDATION - TUITION ASSISTANCE$31,000
NOTRE DAME REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$20,000
ST MARY'S FOOD PANTRY$20,000
SOUTHEAST MISSOURI FOOD BANK$20,000
MONASTERY OF THE DISCALCED CARMELITE NUNS$18,000
NDHS EDU FUND FOUNDATION - SCOREBOARDS & CORP SPONSOR$12,000
ST FRANCIS FOUNDATION- GOLF TOURNEY SPONSOR$10,250
ST FRANCIS FOUNDATION-FRIENDS GOLF TOURNEY$10,250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $152k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOE'S PLACE: $3k → 11%WHOLE HEALTH OUTREACH: $5k → 22%FATHER FLANAGAN'S BOYS HOME (BOYS TOWN): $3k → 23%OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $50k → 14%WHOLE HEALTH OUTREACH: $3k → 22%Whole Health Outreach: $3k → 22%Whole Health Outreach: $3k → 22%Options for Women: $12k → 14%OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $10k → 14%OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $10k → 14%Options for Women: $10k → 14%MISSISSIPPI VALLEY THERAPEUTIC HORSMANSHIP: $3k → 14%MISSISSIPPI VALLEY THERAPEUTIC HORSMANSHIP: $3k → 14%BIRTHRIGHT: $10k → 14%BIRTHRIGHT: $5k → 14%FOSTERADOPT CONNECT: $5k → 14%Birthright: $5k → 14%Birthright: $5k → 14%ONE CITY: $2k → 14%CAPE GIRARDEAU VETERANS HOME FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%FosterAdopt Connect: $2k → 14%One City: $1k → 14%One City: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
PA
CA
MO
VA
AZ
NM
KS
NC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 64 repeat orgs$687k to everyone else

64 repeat relationships: 51 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

64
60

Total granted

$2.3M
$337k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+1%

Still filing today

22%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $350k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPublic Safety & DisasterYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SOUTHEAST MISSOURI FOOD BANK INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $105k · revenue +10%
  • OF
    OPTIONS FOR WOMEN
    4× · 2022–2025 · $92k · revenue +77%
  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK
    3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SM
    St Mary's Cathedral
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • SF
    St Francis Foundation-Mobile Wellne
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • SF
    SEMO FAIR FOUNDATION - SWINE BARN SPONSOR
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Missouri Alliance for Animals

The mission of the missouri alliance for animals is to protect animals from abuse, neglect and inhumane treatment and to promote the welfare of animals through advocacy, education, research and investigations, promotion of humane public…

Animals
2
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
3
Mission St Louis

Mission: st. louis empowers individuals for social and economic growth through relationships and opportunity.

Community Improvement
4
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
5
Missouri Alliance for Animal Legislation

The missouri alliance for animal legislation is a non-profit organization lobbying full time to bring positive change for animals through the legislative process. our efforts are combined with the actions of concerned individuals, other…

—
6
Donate Life Foundation

To improve the quality of life for people affected by organ and tissue donation and transplantation. to transform our community by eliminating the waiting list for organ and tissue transplants.

Health
7
Florence Area Humane Society

To provide veterinary care, vaccines, medicine, food and a nurturing environment to restore animals from abused and neglected situations to a healthy life.

Animals
8
Missouri Forget-Me-Not Horse Rescue Sanctuary

Our mission is to provide aid and sanctuary to abused, neglected, abandoned or donated horses that come to us in need. to work with law enforcement and other agencies in their efforts to rectify situations in which horses are in peril. to…

Animals
9
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
10
Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System Inc

Inspired by the vision of st. francis and in the tradition of the roman catholic church, we extend the healing ministry of jesus christ to god's people, especially those most in need. we call forth all who serve in this healthcare…

Health
11
Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady University

University is a 4 year private catholic institution, offering degrees in nursing, health/behavioral sciences, & humanities. the college is an integral part of the fmol health system.

—
12
Child Safe of Central Missouri Inc

Child safe of central missouri's mission is to respond to and prevent child abuse by providing advocacy, support, and resources to children who are alleged victims of abuse and other traumatic crimes, and to their non-offending family…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Melaina Cunningham and Friends Park Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 150 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/35
Grantees still filing
16/35
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

John Henry Newman Center - CCM: $609,500 · OtherJohn Henry Newman Center - CCMIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCH: $250,000 · OtherIMMACULATE CONCEPTION CHURCHST VINCENT DEPAUL - CAPITAL CAMPAIGN: $200,000 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL - CAPITAL CAMPAIGNST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $160,000 · OtherST LOUIS COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONNEWMAN CENTER OF SEMO: $119,500 · OtherSt Mary's Cathedral: $100,000 · OtherST FRANCIS FOUNDATION-MOBILE WELLNESS: $100,000 · OtherMONASTERY OF THE DISCALCED CARMELITE NUNS: $98,000 · OtherNDHS EDU FUND FOUNDATION - TUITION ASSISTANCE: $91,000 · Other+121 more: $936,885 · Other+121 moreOPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $92,000 · Human ServicesBIRTHRIGHT: $25,000 · Human ServicesVIOLA'S HUGE HEART FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Human ServicesWHOLE HEALTH OUTREACH: $12,500 · Human ServicesFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $6,500 · Human Services+6 more: $17,750 · Human ServicesSOUTHEAST MISSOURI FOOD BANK INC: $105,000 · Food & NutritionFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEARTS WITH HOOVES INC: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentPure Word Communications: $10,000 · ReligionTHE REASON FOR OUR HOPE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · ReligionTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $8,500 · HealthAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $2,500 · HealthTHE TAILOR INSTITUTE INCORPORATED: $2,500 · HealthASHEVILLE AREA ARTS COUNCIL: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$2,664,885Human Services$168,750Food & Nutrition$105,000Youth Development$22,500Religion$15,000Health$13,500Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHEAST MISSOURI FOOD BANK INC: $105,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $92,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT: $25,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC: $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVIOLA'S HUGE HEART FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 3y, 9.3% of budgetWHOLE HEALTH OUTREACH: $12,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetPure Word Communications: $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetASHEVILLE AREA ARTS COUNCIL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF SOUTHEAST MO: $8,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSISSIPPI VALLEY THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP: $5,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMissouri Prairie Foundation: $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE RECOVERY INC: $3,750 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLEOPOLD SCHOOL DISTRICT FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetQUINCY UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TAILOR INSTITUTE INCORPORATED: $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBoys Town Louisiana Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOES PLACE CORPORATION: $2,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANNYS DOSE ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetMAC'S MISSION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAPE GIRARDEAU VETERAN'S HOME FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetNORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL CHILD SAFETY COUNCIL: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLICKERWOOD LITTLE BRITCHES RODEO ASSOCIATION: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMERAMEC HOCKEY CLUB: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FIRE SAFETY COUNCIL INC: $300 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHEAST MISSOURI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS MISSOURI INC ↗
  • Who funds VIOLA'S HUGE HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHOLE HEALTH OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds Pure Word Communications ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO12.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Robert and Anna Drury Family Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Robert and Anna Drury Family Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 150 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert and Anna Drury Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph