How much did ROBERT AND ANNA DRURY FAMILY grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 90% of ROBERT AND ANNA DRURY FAMILY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2022

—

2023

educationreligiouschildrencatholic churchcarecape girmary cathedral

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 75 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k64 grants · $169k
$10k–50k8 grants · $141k
$50k–250k3 grants · $360k

$2,500

Median grant

States reached

$21M

Total assets

Largest grants

John Henry Newman Center - CCM$209,500
St Mary's Cathedral$100,000
St Francis Foundation-Mobile Wellne$50,000
Southeast Missouri Food Bank$45,000
St Louis Community Foundation$20,000
San Antonio Food Bank$20,000
Notre Dame Regional High School$14,000
Options for Women$12,000
St Francis Foundation-Friends Gala$10,000
St Mary Cathedral$10,000
Care to Learn Cape Girardeau$10,000
St Jude Children Research$8,500
Community Partnership of Semo-DWSMS$7,550
Safe House of Southeast Missouri$7,500
Special Olympics Missouri$7,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$813k · 18 repeat orgs$330k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$813k

$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%

+42%

Still filing today

28%

11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $323k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesFood & NutritionReligionEducationInternationalEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

SM
Southeast Missouri Food Bank
2× · 2022–2023 · $55k · revenue +63%
OF
Options for Women
2× · 2022–2023 · $22k · revenue +370%
B
Birthright
2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +33%

Funded once

NA
Northern Arizona University Foundat
one grant, 2022 · $1k
SO
Special Olympics Missouri- Spring G
one grant, 2022 · $1k
RC
Redhawk Club- SEMO Baseball
one grant, 2022 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Mater Filius Queen City Inc

Our mission is to defend and safeguard the life and well-being of the unborn child and the dignity of the childs mother.

Housing & Shelter

Catholic Charities of Central and

Inspired by the Gospel of the Beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…

Human Services

Birth Choice of San Marcos

Provide charitable, religious, and educational support services to women and men dealing with unplanned pregnancy. we strive, through education and outreach, to minister to those facing pregnancy, sexual integrity, and abortion related…

Civil Rights

Catholic Charities of Southern

A faith-based organization that seeks to improve the lives of the vulnerable by providing quality, compassionate social services.

Human Services

Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is south carolina's largest food bank, providing over 25 million meals on average to neighbors in need across the midlands, pee dee and upstate.

Food & Nutrition

The Human Choice of Iowa

Provide women facing an unplanned pregnancy with truthful medical information and education.

Human Services

Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc

The mission of the Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community…

Food & Nutrition

Thrive St Louis Inc

Thrive st. louis is a christ-centered organization that empowers people to make life-affirming and healthy decisions about sex, pregnancy and relationships.

Health

United Way of Southeast Louisiana

To eradicate poverty in southeast louisiana.

Philanthropy

Missouri Coalition for Oral

The mission of the missouri coalition for oral health is to improve oral health with all missourians by advocating for sound public policy.

Health

Birthright of St Charles Inc

The mission of birthright st. charles is to assist women facing an untimely pregnancy in a caring and supportive environment. our guiding principle is, "it is the right of every pregnant woman to give birth, and the right of every child to…

Health

First Option Care Inc

The mission of first option care inc. is to present jesus christ as savior and lord, to bring compassionate help and hope to women and teens who are unprepared for pregnancy, to present sexual abstinence as a positive lifestyle for…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whole Health Outreach and the most unlike its peers is Convoy of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

13/15

Grantees still filing

11/15

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,033,000Food & Nutrition$55,000Human Services$45,250Religion$5,000Education$2,500International$1,000Environment$1,000Public Safety & Disaster$300

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ROBERT AND ANNA DRURY FAMILY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Birthright.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 270053015 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Birthright, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 13% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Robert and Anna Drury Family?

Find your warmest path to Robert and Anna Drury Family through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ROBERT AND ANNA DRURY FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Robert and Anna Drury Family?

More from the funding graph

ROBERT AND ANNA DRURY FAMILY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Robert and Anna Drury Family?

More from the funding graph