Skip to content

· Private foundation

Roaring Brook Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
62
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Environment$3.9MEducation$3.4MFood & Nutrition$2.6MYouth Development$983kArts & Culture$809kAnimals$528kCivil Rights$380kCommunity Improvement$310kOther$0
02FY2025 · 62 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k30 grants · $660k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.5M
$25,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$49M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHELBURNE FARMS$125,000
GREENAGERS$125,000
COASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE$100,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$100,000
CHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY$100,000
ROOTS RISING$100,000
BERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES$100,000
EARTH JUSTICE$100,000
TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS$100,000
ROOTS RISING$75,000
VERMONT FARMERS FOOD CENTER$65,000
ECOLOGY SCHOOL$50,000
TELLING ROOM$50,000
FRESHFARM$50,000
LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER INC$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%EQUESTRIAN CONNECTION: $3k → 8%THE COMPAGNA CENTER: $1k → 9%NON-PROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $15k → 12%NON-PROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
WV
VA
MD
DE
NM
NC
SC
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of Roaring Brook Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 57% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 54%.

Roaring Brook Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 90 repeat orgs$698k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

90 repeat relationships: 45 still active in FY2025, 45 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
34

Total granted

$12M
$571k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+15%

Still filing today

86%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureEducationInternationalAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PUTNEY SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +76%
  • RR
    ROOTS RISING INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $510k · revenue +820%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $475k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +33%
  • CO
    CHABAD OF THE BERKSHIRES
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
  • TC
    TRIPLEX CINEMA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment
2
Bartlett Arboretum Association Inc

To cultivate and develop an expansive collection of trees, gardens, and plants for all to explore, enjoy and study; and to provide through education and stewardship, a greener, healthier, more beautiful environment.

Environment
3
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
4
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
The Adirondack Council Inc

The adirondack council ensures the ecological integrity (clean water and air, wildlife habitat, etc.), wild character (solitude, scenic beauty, etc.), and vibrant communities of new york's six-million-acre adirondack park. the adirondack…

Environment
7
Sudbury Valley Trustees Inc

Sudbury valley trustees, inc. ("the organization") works to protect natural areas and farmland for wildlife and people in the 36 communities that surround the sudbury, assabet, and concord rivers. the organization cares for some of the…

Environment
8
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
9
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
10
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Saint Helena Island Gullah Community Housing Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

110 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 110 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
27
Early backer (in before they grew)
109/110
Grantees still filing
72/110
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EARTHJUSTICE: $475,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICEOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $425,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCYEcology Education Inc: $375,000 · EnvironmentEcology Education IncSHELBURNE FARMS: $326,000 · EnvironmentSHELBURNE FARMSHURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL: $275,000 · EnvironmentHURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOU…WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $250,000 · EnvironmentWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INCTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $200,000 · EnvironmentTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONSBERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC: $181,000 · EnvironmentCHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC: $150,000 · EnvironmentTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $140,000 · Environment+18 more: $740,500 · Environment+18 morePUTNEY SCHOOL INC: $1,325,000 · OtherPUTNEY SCHOOL INCCOASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUE: $375,000 · OtherCOASTAL CONSERVATION LEAGUEFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $200,000 · OtherSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC: $175,000 · OtherST JOHNS COLLEGE IN SANTA FE: $175,000 · OtherEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $250,000 · OtherGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $400,000 · OtherGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTEINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE: $197,500 · Other+58 more: $1,590,500 · Other+58 moreROOTS RISING INC: $510,000 · Food & NutritionROOTS RISING IN…GREENAGERS INC: $400,000 · Food & NutritionGREENAGERS INCFRESHFARM MARKETS: $370,000 · Food & NutritionFRESHFARM MARKE…BERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC: $282,500 · Food & NutritionBERKSHIRE AGRIC…Salvation Farms Inc: $90,000 · Food & NutritionSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $82,500 · Food & NutritionNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC: $75,000 · Food & Nutrition+4 more: $95,000 · Food & NutritionPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,100,000 · EducationPresident and …VERMONT FARMERS MARKET EDUCATION CENTER: $220,000 · EducationVERMONT FARMER…CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $200,000 · EducationCORPORATION OF…ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC: $175,000 · EducationESPERANZA ACAD…+7 more: $139,000 · Education+7 moreLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $353,500 · Youth DevelopmentThe Telling Room: $350,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY: $275,000 · InternationalHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST: $150,000 · InternationalCONTEXTOS NFP: $90,000 · InternationalPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $77,500 · InternationalWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $70,000 · InternationalTHE WOMEN'S BAKERY INC: $25,000 · International+2 more: $21,000 · InternationalWAVE FARM INC: $185,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureSILK ROAD PROJECT INC: $56,000 · Arts & CultureTRIPLEX CINEMA INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureTHE RICHMOND BALLET: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GREENFIELD REVIEW LITERARY CENTER INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureBERKSHIRE COMMUNITY RADIO ALLIANCE INC: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $21,000 · Arts & Culture
Environment$3,537,500Other$4,688,000Food & Nutrition$1,905,000Education$1,834,000Youth Development$808,000International$708,500Arts & Culture$492,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPUTNEY SCHOOL INC: $1,325,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $1,100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetROOTS RISING INC: $510,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $475,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $425,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGREENAGERS INC: $400,000 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetGULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $400,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetEcology Education Inc: $375,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetFRESHFARM MARKETS: $370,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $353,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe Telling Room: $350,000 over 8y, 10% of budgetSHELBURNE FARMS: $326,000 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetBERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC: $282,500 over 7y, 7.1% of budgetHURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL: $275,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY: $275,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $250,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $250,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT FARMERS MARKET EDUCATION CENTER: $220,000 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS: $200,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE: $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $200,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE: $197,500 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWAVE FARM INC: $185,000 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetBERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC: $181,000 over 8y, 9.2% of budgetSCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC: $175,000 over 3y, 8.3% of budgetESPERANZA ACADEMY INC: $175,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC: $150,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS FIRST: $150,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC: $150,000 over 3y, 9.5% of budgetTHE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC: $140,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetHOPEFUL HORIZONS: $122,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetPEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION: $119,000 over 8y, 4.4% of budgetTHE ORION SOCIETY INC: $117,500 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetTHE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetNEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 6y, 6.8% of budgetHOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC: $100,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetJAMES RIVER ASSOCIATION: $95,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSalvation Farms Inc: $90,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetCONTEXTOS NFP: $90,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC: $82,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetVOICE OF WITNESS A NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CORPORATION: $80,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetPHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS INC: $77,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YOUNG FARMERS COALITION INC: $75,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetWOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBERKSHIRE TACONIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBERKSHIRE INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL CORP: $57,500 over 8y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PUTNEY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds GREENAGERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GULF OF MAINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Ecology Education Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRESHFARM MARKETS ↗
  • Who funds LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Telling Room ↗
  • Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE AGRICULTURAL VENTURES INC ↗
  • Who funds HURRICANE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY ↗
  • Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT FARMERS MARKET EDUCATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
  • Who funds CORPORATION OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE ↗
  • Who funds WAVE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL OF LEADERSHIP-AFGHANISTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds ESPERANZA ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES RIVER CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE POTOMAC CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPEFUL HORIZONS ↗
  • Who funds PEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ORION SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FILMMAKERS COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND FORESTRY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE EARTH CIRCLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation IncMA28× affinity12 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc · The Feigenbaum Foundation Inc · Berkshire Bank Foundation Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Jane and Jack Fitzpatrick Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation · Geoffrey C Hughes Foundation Inc · Oristaglio Family Foundation · Lee Bank Foundation Inc · Dan and Merrie Boone Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Roaring Brook Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Roaring Brook Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • New England Forestry Foundation Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Housatonic River Initiative Inc: 79% of income from government
  • Vermont Youth Conservation Corps Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Housatonic Valley Association Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Salvation Farms Inc: 26% of income from government
  • EcoHealth Alliance Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Osamequin Farm Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Nonprofit Center of the Berkshires Inc: 18% of income from government
  • The Green Mountain Club Inc Debonis: 17% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Greenagers Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Roots Rising Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Boston Camerata Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Silk Road Project Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Shelburne Farms: 3% of income from government
  • Berkshire Taconic Community Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations: 2% of income from government
  • The Orion Society Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Agricultural Ventures Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Filmmakers Collaborative Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Berkshire Garden Center Inc Dba Berkshire Botanical Garden Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
23report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Roaring Brook Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Roaring Brook Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 138 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roaring Brook Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph