· Public charity
ROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA 1st Place Sports Running Club Inc
Promotion of living a healthy lifestyle by providing training information and classes and providing running and walks events.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $307,675 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $567,119 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $259,444 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $151k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $138k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UF Health | $138,385 |
| Evergreen Cemetery Association | $36,897 |
| North Shores Improvement Association | $34,421 |
| Episcopal School of Jacksonville | $31,764 |
| Childrens Miracle Network | $27,319 |
| Military Museum of North Florida | $20,293 |
| Grace Episcopal Day School | $9,917 |
| Chemo Noir Foundation | $8,679 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -24% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- STSHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC3× · 2023–2025 · $383k · revenue +29%
- ECEvergreen Cemetery Association8× · 2017–2025 · $251k · revenue +7%
- ESEPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF JACKSONVILLE INC6× · 2020–2025 · $187k · revenue +22%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $39k
- RRROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA - JACKSONVIgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue +42%
- JMJACKSONVILLE MARINE CORP-12 MARATHone grant, 2017 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…
As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…
The mission of the Jacksonville Historical Society is to strengthen citizenship through public history education.
As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…
As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…
As a part of UF Health, the organization's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across…
To improve the business climate, promote economic development, and enhance the quality of life in the jacksonville area. the jacksonville area chamber of commerce encourages businesses by building relationships to create a vibrant tomorrow.
Raise Funds for the National MS Society
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacksonville University and the most unlike its peers is North Shores Improvement Associatio. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SHANDS TEACHING HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds Evergreen Cemetery Association ↗
- Who funds EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF JACKSONVILLE INC ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTH SHORES IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATIO ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CHEMO NOIR INC ↗
- Who funds MILITARY MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Northeast Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds ROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA - JACKSONVI ↗
- Who funds The Arc Jacksonville Inc ↗
- Who funds Jacksonville University ↗
- Who funds ST JOHNS COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds San Marco Merchants Association Inc ↗
- Who funds FLAMINGO CHARITIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Csx Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization ROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA 1st Place Sports Running Club Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Jacksonville University — 3% of income from government
- St Johns Country Day School — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to ROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA 1st Place Sports Running Club Inc?
Find your warmest path to ROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA 1st Place Sports Running Club Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.