Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rm2 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$170k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$154k
Largest
01What you fund
0187% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$5.3MInternational$196kPhilanthropy$128kCivil Rights$75kArts & Culture$55kHealth$46kReligion$45kEducation$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $154k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$154,000
CERE$10,000
FUND FOR URI & HILLEL$3,000
OMNI-MED$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 2% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1.3M → 7%OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 7%OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1.2M → 7%INSTITUTE FOR STUDY AND PRACTICE OF NON VIOLENCE: $1k → 14%OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $722k → 7%OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $667k → 7%OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $154k → 7%OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $55k → 7%JEWISH ALLIANCE OF GREATER RHODE ISLAND: $62k → 14%JEWISH ALLIANCE OF GREATER RHODE ISLAND: $33k → 14%JEWISH ALLIANCE OF GREATER RHODE ISLAND: $28k → 14%JEWISH ALLIANCE OF GREATER RHODE ISLAND: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.7M · 10 repeat orgs$278k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$5.7M
$278k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+17%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalHealthArts & CultureEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.3M · revenue +33%
  • JA
    JEWISH ALLIANCE OF GREATER RHODE ISLAND
    4× · 2017–2022 · $128k · revenue +15%
  • THE RHODE ISLAND FREE CLINIC INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • FT
    FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue -15%
  • Trinity Repertory Companygraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $32k · revenue +52%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
2
University of Judaism Foundation
3
The Shalem Foundation

To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.

Crime & Legal
4
Foundation for Conservative Judiasm of South Florida
5
American Friends of Kohelet Policy Forum

The principal and primary intent of the organization is to support kohelet policy forum (the "forum"), a jerusalem-based non-profit policy center founded in 2012, comprised of leading academics and researchers.

6
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
7
The Jerusalem Connection
8
Foundation Stone Institute Inc

To promote a positive relationship between catholics and israelis.

9
The Israel Innovation Fund Inc

Our vision is to reignite the zionist spirit and meet the needs of jewish civilization in the twenty-first century by connecting people around the world through the vibrancy and creativity of contemporary israeli culture.

Arts & Culture
10
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
11
Physicians for Palestine
Health
12
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $5,288,283 · Human ServicesOCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION+2 more — $129,132 · Human ServicesIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherCERE — $80,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES - NEW ENGLAND REGION — $48,000 · OtherFUND FOR URI & HILLEL — $24,000 · OtherOMNI MED INC — $24,000 · OtherCINNABAR THEATER — $23,000 · Other+7 more — $43,341 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $82,000 · InternationalNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA — $10,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $10,000 · InternationalFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC — $75,000 · Civil RightsPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $36,000 · PhilanthropyTrinity Repertory Company — $31,630 · Arts & CultureTHE RHODE ISLAND FREE CLINIC INC — $10,750 · HealthBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $10,000 · Health
Human Services$5,417,415Other$342,341International$102,000Civil Rights$75,000Philanthropy$36,000Arts & Culture$31,630Health$20,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — $5,288,283 over 7y, 18% of budgetJEWISH ALLIANCE OF GREATER RHODE ISLAND — $128,132 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $82,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC — $36,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrinity Repertory Company — $31,630 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE RHODE ISLAND FREE CLINIC INC — $10,750 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAISH CAMPUS BOSTON INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OCEAN STATE JOB LOT CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds JEWISH ALLIANCE OF GREATER RHODE ISLAND
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC
  • Who funds Trinity Repertory Company
  • Who funds THE RHODE ISLAND FREE CLINIC INC
  • Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA
  • Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT
  • Who funds AISH CAMPUS BOSTON INC
  • Who funds NONVIOLENCE INSTITUTE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ira S& Anna Galkin Charitable TrRI15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ira S& Anna Galkin Charitable Tr · The Champlin Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rm2 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • Boston Medical Center Corporation23% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Rm2 Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Rm2 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph