Skip to content

· Private foundation

RL & DG Tusch Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$76kEnvironment$58kArts & Culture$14kYouth Development$6kPublic Benefit$500
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS LAND CONSERVANCY$10,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$10,000
UATX$10,000
COASTAL PRAIRIE CONSERVANCY$4,000
TEXAS 4-H$2,000
TEXAS 4-H$2,000
TEXAS 4-H$2,000
LOWELL AREA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION$2,000
SAN MARCOS RIVER FOUNDATION INC$2,000
HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY BAND INC$1,000
ADA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%TURNING POINT USA INC: $500 → 11%PIONEER FLIGHT MUSEUM: $1k → 10%WIMBERLEY VILLAGE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%UATX: $500 → 10%TEXAS 4-H: $2k → 15%SOUTHWEST MUSEUM OF CLOCKS & WATCHES: $500 → 15%COASTAL PRAIRIE CONSERVANCY: $4k → 16%TEXAS 4-H: $2k → 17%ADA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $1k → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $10k → 14%WIMBERLEY VILLAGE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%UATX: $10k → 10%NESBITT MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 15%COASTAL PRAIRIE CONSERVANCY: $2k → 16%LOWELL AREA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $2k → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $10k → 14%WIMBERLEY VILLAGE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%UATX: $10k → 10%NESBITT MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $1k → 15%LOWELL AREA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $2k → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $10k → 14%WIMBERLEY VILLAGE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%UATX: $500 → 10%LOWELL AREA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $500 → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2k → 14%TEXAS 4-H: $2k → 10%LOWELL AREA HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $500 → 11%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2k → 14%WIMBERLEY VILLAGE LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1k → 14%HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY BAND INC: $1k → 10%HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY BAND INC: $1k → 10%HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY BAND INC: $1k → 10%HILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY BAND INC: $1k → 10%FRIENDS OF THE WIMBERLEY VILLAGE LIBRARY: $600 → 10%COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $2k → 10%COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$109k · 9 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$109k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+43%

Still filing today

78%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    Texas Land Conservancy
    6× · 2020–2025 · $42k · revenue +70%
  • U
    UATX
    4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +401%
  • SM
    San Marcos River Foundation
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • PF
    PIONEER FLIGHT MUSEUM
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue -51%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE WIMBERLEY VILLAGELIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $600
  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue +43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Flying Legends Museum
—
2
Lone Star Flight Museum

Lone Star Flight Museum (LSFM) celebrates flight and achievements in Texas aviation, engages youth through STEM (science, technology, engineering, and math), and believes aviation inspires achievement and endless possibilities.

Arts & Culture
3
Witte Museum

The witte museum inspires people to shape the future of texas through transformative and relevant experiences in nature, science and culture.

Arts & Culture
4
The Museum of Western Art

The Museum of Western Art in the Texas Hill Country is dedicated to excellence in the collection, preservation and display of Western art.

Arts & Culture
5
The Museum of North Texas History

To collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret the history of the North Texas Area to inspire an interest in the past for the education and enrichment of people of all ages.

Arts & Culture
6
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
7
Conservation History Association of Tx

The Association is developing, distributing and archiving oral histories, atlas maps and descriptive essays, and wildlife illustrations to expand public appreciation and grasp of Texas environmental history.

Education
8
Texas Association of Museums

The Texas Association of Museums strengthens the Texas museum community through collaborations, connections, professional development, and advocacy.

Arts & Culture
9
San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association

To collect and preserve significant historical materials that relate to the early history and culture of Texas and to promote the study of the history of Texas through exhibits, publications, and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
10
Texas Library Association

Texas library association (tla) was established in 1902 to promote, support, and improve library services in texas.

—
11
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
12
Connecticut Aeronautical Historical Association Inc

The new england air museum's mission is to preserve and present the story of aviation and aerospace, with an emphasis on new england's role, and the genius and inspiration that made it possible. the museum also seeks to inspire young…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uatx; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Texas Land Conservancy: $41,500 · EnvironmentTexas Land ConservancySan Marcos River Foundation: $10,000 · EnvironmentSan Marcos River FoundationCoastal Prairie Conservancy: $6,000 · EnvironmentCoastal Prairie ConservancyHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $35,000 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGEUATX: $21,000 · EducationUATX+1 more: $500 · EducationWimberley Village Library Foundation: $15,600 · Public BenefitWimberley V…TEXAS 4-H: $6,000 · OtherTEXAS 4-HHILL COUNTRY COMMUNITY BAND INC: $4,000 · OtherHILL COUNTR…NESBITT MEMORIAL LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · OtherNESBITT MEM…Ada Historical Society: $1,000 · OtherAda Histori…FRIENDS OF THE WIMBERLEY VILLAGELIBRARY: $600 · Other+2 more: $1,000 · Other+2 moreLowell Area Historical Museum: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $2,500 · Arts & CulturePIONEER FLIGHT MUSEUM: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Environment$57,500Education$56,500Public Benefit$15,600Other$15,600Arts & Culture$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTexas Land Conservancy: $41,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUATX: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWimberley Village Library Foundation: $15,600 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSan Marcos River Foundation: $10,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetCoastal Prairie Conservancy: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLowell Area Historical Museum: $5,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAda Historical Society: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Texas Land Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UATX ↗
  • Who funds Wimberley Village Library Foundation ↗
  • Who funds San Marcos River Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Coastal Prairie Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds Lowell Area Historical Museum ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMEMORATIVE AIR FORCE ↗
  • Who funds Ada Historical Society ↗
  • Who funds PIONEER FLIGHT MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization RL & DG Tusch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from RL & DG Tusch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on RL & DG Tusch’s filings →

    More from the funding graph