Skip to content
Ritter G FBO Charities Max Endw at a glance

· Private foundation

Ritter G FBO Charities Max Endw

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$785k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$240k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$1.2MEducation$965kArts & Culture$256kReligion$210kYouth Development$154kCrime & Legal$154kHuman Services$154kPhilanthropy$103kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $277k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $498k
$20,072
Median grant
5
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROMEDICA$240,094
BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY$157,393
RITTER LIBRARY BOARD OF TTEE$50,181
THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART$50,181
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$39,675
FLOWER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$31,581
YMCA OF GREATER TOLEDO$20,072
TOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION$20,072
RIVERSIDE MERCY HOSPITAL$20,072
YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC$20,072
ST LUKES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,072
OHIO STATE BAR FOUNDATION$20,072
MERCY FOUNDATION$20,072
GIRL SCOUTS OF WESTERN OHIO$15,054
FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH$15,054
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $46k → 13%OHIO STATE BAR FOUNDATION: $23k → 15%ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR FDN: $23k → 16%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $159k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER TOLEDO: $23k → 18%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $36k → 13%OHIO STATE BAR FOUNDATION: $23k → 15%ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR FDN: $23k → 16%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $157k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER TOLEDO: $23k → 18%SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $36k → 13%OHIO STATE BAR FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%MERCY FOUNDATION: $20k → 16%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $144k → 17%YMCA OF GREATER TOLEDO: $20k → 18%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $140k → 17%ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR FDN: $18k → 18%BALDWIN WALLACE UNIVERSITY: $58k → 17%FLOWER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $18k → 18%THE RITTER LIBRARY BOARD OF TTEE: $58k → 11%ST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR FDN: $18k → 18%THE RITTER LIBRARY BOARD OF TTEE: $58k → 11%FLOWER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $18k → 18%RITTER LIBRARY BOARD OF TTEE: $50k → 11%RIVERSIDE MERCY HOSPITAL: $23k → 18%THE RITTER LIBRARY BOARD OF TTEE: $46k → 11%THE RITTER LIBRARY BOARD OF TTEE: $45k → 11%ST LUKES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $23k → 18%ST LUKES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $23k → 18%ST LUKES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%ST LUKES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $18k → 18%ST LUKES HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $18k → 18%FLOWER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $32k → 18%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $23k → 18%TOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $23k → 18%FLOWER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $23k → 18%TOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $23k → 18%RIVERSIDE MERCY HOSPITAL: $23k → 18%FLOWER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $23k → 18%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $23k → 18%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $20k → 18%RIVERSIDE MERCY HOSPITAL: $20k → 18%TOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $20k → 18%YMCA OF GREATER TOLEDO: $18k → 18%TOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $18k → 18%RIVERSIDE MERCY HOSPITAL: $18k → 18%TOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $18k → 18%YMCA OF GREATER TOLEDO: $18k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 24 repeat orgs$93k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
3

Total granted

$3.1M
$72k

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthCrime & LegalPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BW
    Baldwin Wallace University
    5× · 2020–2024 · $659k · revenue +8%
  • TT
    THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART
    5× · 2020–2024 · $256k · revenue +117%
  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $203k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $49k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • FC
    FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The University of Toledo Foundation

The mission of the university of toledo foundation is to secure the future for the university of toledo, through prudent asset management and philanthropy. we build strong linkages between alumni and the university, fostering a spirit of…

Education
2
University of Toledo Alumni Association

Supporting the university of toledo by fostering a spirit of loyalty among its alumni.

Education
3
Ohio State Bar Association

The ohio state bar association (the "association") is an unincorporated voluntary non-profit organization. the association was formed to promote justice and advance the interests of the legal profession.

—
4
Ohio Bankers League

Provide comprehensive services that benefit the financial institution industry in ohio.

Community Improvement
5
University of Toledo Physicians Clinical Faculty Inc

To improve the human condition through excellence in patient care and medical discovery.

—
6
Toledo Regional Chamber of Commerce

To solve critical business challenges in order to create vibrant economic opportunities for all in our region.

—
7
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
8
Ohio Business Roundtable

To harness the collective expertise of ohio's ceos to advocate for policies that improve ohio's economic competitiveness.

—
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Hospital Council of Northwest Ohio

The hospital council of northwest ohio is a member-driven organization that represents and advocates on behalf of its member hospitals and health systems, and provides collaborative opportunities to enhance the health status of the…

Health
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Toledo Area Chamber Foundation

To help grow business development and economic activity in the toledo area.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio State Bar Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Supreme Council of Sovereign Grand Inspectors General for the Nmj. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PROMEDICA: $549,404 · OtherPROMEDICATHE RITTER LIBRARY BOARD OF TTEE: $256,387 · OtherTHE RITTER LIBRARY BOARD OF TTEEFLOWER HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $114,063 · OtherFLOWER HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONRIVERSIDE MERCY HOSPITAL: $102,554 · OtherRIVERSIDE MERCY HOSPITALYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $102,554 · OtherYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCST LUKE'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $102,554 · OtherST LUKE'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Toledo: $102,554 · OtherYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater ToledoST VINCENT MEDICAL CTR FDN: $82,482 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $76,916 · OtherFIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH: $65,407 · Other+11 more: $187,154 · Other+11 moreBaldwin Wallace University: $658,715 · EducationBaldwin Wallace Univers…THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $256,387 · Arts & CultureTHE TOLED…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $202,712 · HealthOHIO STATE BAR FOUNDATION: $102,554 · Crime & LegalTOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $102,554 · PhilanthropyGirl Scouts of Western Ohio: $76,916 · Youth DevelopmentTOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $51,277 · Community Improvement
Other$1,742,029Education$658,715Arts & Culture$256,387Health$202,712Crime & Legal$102,554Philanthropy$102,554Youth Development$76,916Community Improvement$51,277

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBaldwin Wallace University: $658,715 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART: $256,387 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $202,712 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO STATE BAR FOUNDATION: $102,554 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetST LUKE'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $102,554 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetTOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION: $102,554 over 5y, 69% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Toledo: $102,554 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGirl Scouts of Western Ohio: $76,916 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $51,277 over 5y, 11% of budgetSUPREME COUNCIL OF SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ: $3,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Baldwin Wallace University ↗
  • Who funds THE TOLEDO MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds OHIO STATE BAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO ROTARY CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Toledo ↗
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Western Ohio ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO BAR ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SUPREME COUNCIL OF SOVEREIGN GRAND INSPECTORS GENERAL FOR THE NMJ ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ritter G FBO Charities Max Endw funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ritter G FBO Charities Max Endw. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ritter G FBO Charities Max Endw’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home