Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rita Mallett Blasser Foundationinc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$37kHuman Services$30kEnvironment$25kEducation$15kHealth$5kEmployment$5k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $70k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $120k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOOTSTEPS$70,000
HOUSTON FOOD BANK$50,000
TEA FUND$20,000
DRESS FOR SUCCESS HOUSTON$10,000
ENSEMBLE THEATRE$10,000
HOUSTON YOUTH SYMPHONY$10,000
INPRINT INC$10,000
MILDRED'S UMBRELLA THEATER COMPANY$10,000
LILITH FUND$5,000
JANE'S DUE PROCESS$5,000
COBALT FOUNDATION$5,000
FUND TEXAS CHOICE$5,000
EAST TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%DRESS FOR SUCCESS HOUSTON: $10k → 16%DRESS FOR SUCCESS HOUSTON: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$242k · 8 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$242k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
0%

Still filing today

88%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FI
    FOOTSTEPS INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $100k · revenue +20%
  • NN
    National Network of Abortion Funds
    3× · 2023–2025 · $45k · revenue +17%
  • HY
    HOUSTON YOUTH SYMPHONY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • TA
    TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-COMMERCE FOUND
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • WI
    Writers in the Schools
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas dba Every Body Tx

Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas ("WHFPT") is dedicated to the belief that all Texans deserve the right to determine the number, timing, and spacing of their children through access to affordable, confidential,…

Health
2
Texas Pregnancy Care Network

Texas pregnancy care network is committed to assisting pregnant women and their families in need of compassionate, practical and life affirming alternatives to abortion.

Human Services
3
Clinic Access Support Network

Clinic Access Support Network (CASN) provides transportation, accommodations, childcare assistance, and compassionate care to Houstonians seeking abortion services. During this year, the organization paused coordination of direct services.

Environment
4
Houston Local Information Initiative Inc

The Houston Local Information Initiative, Inc. provides public service journalism that reflects the civic needs of the diverse communities comprising Greater Houston.

Arts & Culture
5
American Civil Liberties Union of Texas Inc

The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.

—
6
Houston Coalition for Life

Houston coalition for life aims to end abortion in houston, peacefully and prayerfully.

Health
7
Aclu Foundation of Texas Inc

The ACLU Foundation of Texas is the unyielding guardian and promoter of freedom, justice, equality and dignity of all people, particularly for those who are still fighting to secure the full exercise of their civil rights and liberties.…

Civil Rights
8
Austin Rainbow Theatre

Austin Rainbow Theatre provides affordable theatre that focuses on creating belonging, reducing stigma, honoring diverse LGBTQIA+ history and stories, and amplifying LGBTQIA+ artist and community voices.

Arts & Culture
9
Susan Smith Blackburn Prize Inc
—
10
National Network of Abortion Funds

Frontera fund is dedicated to advancing reproductive justice values and access to reproductive health in the rio grande valley and border communities in texas by providing comprehensive direct services, including abortion funding and…

Environment
11
Harmonia Stellarum Houston

Harmonia Stellarum is an ensemble of professional vocalists and instrumentalists specialized in historically informed performance practice who seek to inspire, entertain, and enlighten audiences with meaningful, historically informed…

Arts & Culture
12
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Network of Abortion Funds Lilith Fund; the most unlike its peers is Mildreds Umbrella Theater Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOOTSTEPS INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesFOOTSTEPS INCDRESS FOR SUCCESS HOUSTON: $15,000 · Human ServicesDRESS FOR SUCCESS HOUSTONThe Houston Food Bank: $50,000 · OtherThe Houston Food BankINPRINT INC: $17,000 · OtherINPRINT INCIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-COMMERCE FOUND: $5,000 · OtherTEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-COMMERCE …Texas A&M University-Commerce: $3,000 · OtherNational Network of Abortion Funds: $45,000 · EnvironmentNational Network of …FUND TEXAS CHOICE: $10,000 · EnvironmentFUND TEXAS CHOICENATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $5,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF …HOUSTON YOUTH SYMPHONY: $20,000 · Arts & CultureHOUSTON YOUTH SYM…THE ENSEMBLE THEATRE: $20,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ENSEMBLE THEA…MILDREDS UMBRELLA THEATER COMPANY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureMILDREDS UMBRELLA…COBALT FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Civil RightsJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $5,000 · Civil RightsWriters in the Schools: $5,000 · Education
Human Services$115,000Other$90,000Environment$60,000Arts & Culture$50,000Civil Rights$10,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOOTSTEPS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Network of Abortion Funds: $45,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetHOUSTON YOUTH SYMPHONY: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE ENSEMBLE THEATRE: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINPRINT INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDRESS FOR SUCCESS HOUSTON: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMILDREDS UMBRELLA THEATER COMPANY: $10,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetFUND TEXAS CHOICE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWriters in the Schools: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJANE'S DUE PROCESS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Powell FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Powell Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rita Mallett Blasser Foundationinc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rita Mallett Blasser Foundationinc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rita Mallett Blasser Foundationinc?

    Find your warmest path to Rita Mallett Blasser Foundationinc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rita Mallett Blasser Foundationinc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph