Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Carr Community Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Education$1.3MHuman Services$15kHousing & Shelter$2kCivil Rights$349
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$300,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$916
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GEORGETOWN VISITATION PREPARATORY SCHOOL$300,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BAY AREA WOMEN & CHILREN'S CENTER: $2k → 10%THE PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $4k → 9%BAY AREA WOMEN & CHILREN'S CENTER: $700 → 10%THE PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $4k → 9%BAY AREA WOMEN & CHILREN'S CENTER: $610 → 10%THE PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 11 repeat orgs$990 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2021, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$990

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+131%

Still filing today

27%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21
Human ServicesEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GV
    GEORGETOWN VISITATION PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2021 · $1.2M
  • BJ
    BISHOP JOHN T WALKER SCHOOL FOR BOYS
    3× · 2017–2019 · $78k
  • SA
    ST ANTHONY CATHOLIC SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2019 · $53k

Funded once

  • NB
    NORTH BEVERLY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $641
  • CO
    CASA OF LOS ANGELESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $349 · revenue +131%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/5
Grantees still filing
3/5
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GEORGETOWN VISITATION PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC — $1,200,000 · OtherGEORGETOWN VISITATION PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCBISHOP JOHN T WALKER SCHOOL FOR BOYS — $77,633 · OtherBISHOP JOHN T WALKER SCHOOL FOR BOYSST ANTHONY CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $52,633 · Other+6 more — $19,307 · OtherPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC — $11,110 · Human ServicesBay Area Womens and Childrens Center — $3,736 · Human ServicesProject Hope Alliance — $2,301 · EducationCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $349 · Civil Rights
Other$1,349,573Human Services$14,846Education$2,301Civil Rights$349

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC — $11,110 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCHANGE FOR KIDS INC — $6,433 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBay Area Womens and Childrens Center — $3,736 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetProject Hope Alliance — $2,301 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $349 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PORT CHESTER CARVER CENTER INC
  • Who funds CHANGE FOR KIDS INC
  • Who funds Bay Area Womens and Childrens Center
  • Who funds Project Hope Alliance
  • Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC10× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Carr Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Carr Community Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Carr Community Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph