Skip to content

· Private foundation

Risbrudt-Eian Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$126k
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$259kEducation$140kHealth$77kReligion$64kPublic Safety & Disaster$33kFood & Nutrition$29kRecreation & Sports$21kAnimals$16kOther$0
02FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k24 grants · $64k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $62k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRESENT COVE$25,000
LUCAS KARL WOLFORD FAMILY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$11,985
COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE$10,000
FARNSWORTH SCHOOL ORGANIZATION$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PRAIRIECARE FUND$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,000
UNDERWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOL$4,000
WRAPPED IN LOVE$4,000
EAGLE HEALING NEST$3,000
TIM TEBOW FOUNDATION$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
DEMING HIGH SCHOOL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $200k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LET'S GO FISHING: $3k → 9%BEYOND NEW BEGINNINGS: $15k → 5%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $4k → 5%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $3k → 5%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $2k → 5%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $1k → 5%CRESENT COVE: $30k → 11%CRESENT COVE: $30k → 11%BUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $1k → 5%CRESENT COVE: $26k → 11%CRESENT COVE: $25k → 11%CRESENT COVE: $25k → 11%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE: $10k → 11%CRESENT COVE: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
ND
MN
MI
NY
SD
IN
PA
CO
NE
AZ
NM
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$454k · 24 repeat orgs$270k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +25% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
44

Total granted

$454k
$196k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+24%

Still filing today

33%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationPhilanthropyPublic BenefitHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CRESCENT COVE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $161k · revenue +173%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $20k · revenue +112%
  • EH
    EAGLES HEALING NEST
    5× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • BN
    Beyond New Beginningsgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +355% · 35% of their budget
  • ML
    MAPLE LAKE HIGH SCHOOL DIST 881
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
2
Great Plains Food Bank

End hunger together.

Food & Nutrition
3
Great River Rescue

Operation of an animal shelter for unwanted and abandoned animals, community education to encourage humane treatment and responsible ownership.

Animals
4
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
5
Macomb County Humane Society

Provide care for homeless/abused animals

Animals
6
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
7
Retrieve a Golden of Minnesota (Ragom) Inc

Retrieve a golden of the midwest (ragom) rescues, fosters, and rehomes golden retrievers and golden mixes that can no longer remain in their current environments. the organization ensures each dog receives necessary veterinary care and…

Animals
8
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
9
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
10
Nevada Humane Society

To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.

Animals
11
Pet Network Humane Society

Pet Network rescues adoptable animals from euthanasia, connects abandoned animals with loving families, instills respect for animals through humane education, and enhances lives through animal companionship.

Animals
12
Safe Hands Animal Rescue

To save and improve the lives of companion animals by engaging communities and connecting people, resources and knowledge.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tim Tebow Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prairiecare Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNDERWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOL: $37,500 · OtherUNDERWOOD PUBLIC SCHOOLMAPLE LAKE SCHOOL DIST 881: $33,100 · OtherMAPLE LAKE SCHOOL DIST 881PEACE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $18,000 · OtherBEAUTIFUL SAVIOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $17,000 · Other916 EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $17,000 · OtherLUCAS KARL WOLFORD FAMILY: $15,000 · Other+62 more: $310,469 · Other+62 moreCRESCENT COVE: $161,200 · Human ServicesCRESCENT COVEBeyond New Beginnings: $15,000 · Human ServicesBeyond New BeginningsBUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $11,000 · Human ServicesBUFFALO FOOD SHELFCOMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC: $10,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · EducationFARNSWORTH SCHOOL ORGANIZATION INC: $6,000 · EducationASHBY LEGACY FUND: $5,600 · EducationLake Region Pioneer Threshermens Association: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsEAGLES HEALING NEST: $11,600 · Public BenefitPRAIRIECARE FUND: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyMedical Mutts Service Dogs Inc: $1,780 · AnimalsCROSSROADS ANIMAL SHELTER: $1,000 · AnimalsAnimal Humane Society: $1,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY: $1,000 · Animals
Other$448,069Human Services$199,700Education$31,600Recreation & Sports$20,000Public Benefit$11,600Philanthropy$8,000Animals$4,780

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCRESCENT COVE: $161,200 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLake Region Pioneer Threshermens Association: $20,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetBeyond New Beginnings: $15,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetEAGLES HEALING NEST: $11,600 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBUFFALO FOOD SHELF: $11,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF FOREST SERVICE HISTORY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFARNSWORTH SCHOOL ORGANIZATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetASHBY LEGACY FUND: $5,600 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPRAIRIECARE FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE PHOENIX RESIDENCE INC: $4,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGillette Children's Hospital Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOMEPLACE SAFE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIM TEBOW FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MEAL: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLets Go Fishing: $2,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetVivie Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMedical Mutts Service Dogs Inc: $1,780 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCROSSROADS ANIMAL SHELTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAnimal Humane Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFERGUS FALLS COMMUNITY FOOD SHELF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF OTTER TAIL COUNTY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CRESCENT COVE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Lake Region Pioneer Threshermens Association ↗
  • Who funds Beyond New Beginnings ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES HEALING NEST ↗
  • Who funds BUFFALO FOOD SHELF ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF FOREST SERVICE HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds FARNSWORTH SCHOOL ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHBY LEGACY FUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN19.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · The Graco Foundation · West Central Initiative · Tradition Family Foundation · Otter Tail Power Company Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · Communitygiving · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Risbrudt-Eian Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Risbrudt-Eian Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Risbrudt-Eian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph