· Private foundation
Rights Education Adoption & Protection for Animal Welfare
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of RIGHTS EDUCATION ADOPTION & PROTECTION FOR ANIMAL WELFARE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k35 grants · $72k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MCCALLUM | $10,000 |
| MAUI FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| COACHELLA VALLEY HORSE RESCUE | $5,000 |
| HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE DESERT | $5,000 |
| JOSLYN CENTER | $5,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN FEDERATION INC | $4,000 |
| CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE | $3,000 |
| GREYHOUND RESCUE & REHABILITATION | $3,000 |
| HOPE ALLIANCE FOR ANIMALS | $3,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| IMUA FAMILY SERVICES | $2,500 |
| FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| BRANFORD COMPASSION CLUB | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $76k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 62% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ASSISTANCE DOGS OF HAWAII7× · 2017–2023 · $33k · revenue +99%
MAUI FOOD BANK INC6× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +259%- GRGREYHOUND RESCUE & REHABILITATION8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- RFREAP FOR ANIMAL WELFAREone grant, 2023 · $30k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $3k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2019 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide a safety net for Kauai's homeless pets that cannot be assisted through existing Island Rescue efforts.
Matching furry friends with their purr-fect homes & offering affordable spay/neuter.
To rescue and relocate abused, abandoned and stray domestic animals,to provide temporary housing for them through kares' foster care network and to facilitate adoptions into caring and permanent homes. kares seeks to reduce over population…
To improve the health & well-being of animals through veterinary aid, response, training, research & local capacity building worldwide. We provide services to companion animals, horses, street dogs, livestock and marine animals including…
To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.
The mission of the hawaii island humane society is to prevent cruelty to animals, eliminate pet over population, and enhance the bond between humans and animals.
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
Fix our ferals (dba animal fix clinic) provides affordable, excellent quality spay/neuter and other life-saving and life-changing surgeries for companion dogs, cats and community cats.
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
The humane society of manatee county leads the community in fostering compassion and respect for animals through quality care, education, and advocacy to improve the lives of animals and strengthen the human-animal bond.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maui Humane Society and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 85 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASSISTANCE DOGS OF HAWAII ↗
- Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds GREYHOUND RESCUE & REHABILITATION ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT FOODSHARE INC ↗
- Who funds IMUA FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds FIDELCO GUIDE DOG FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER NEW HAVEN CAT PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN & FAMILY LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE MAUI INC ↗
- Who funds Cove Communities Senior Association DBA The Joslyn Center ↗
- Who funds Family Life Center Inc ↗
- Who funds MAUI HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Coachella Valley Mounted Rangers ↗
- Who funds MAUI ARTS & CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
- Who funds WHALE TRUST ↗
- Who funds HAWAII PET NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds HOSPICE OF KONA INC ↗
- Who funds BRANFORD COMPASSION CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds PAWS SOUTH FLORIDA RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN HELPING WOMEN ↗
- Who funds Animal Samaritans ↗
- Who funds THE WILDCAT SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds CONNECTICUT DRAFT HORSE RESCUE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Bendon Family Foundation · Maui United Way · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · The Laurence H Dorcy Hawaiian Foundation · Fred Baldwin Memorial Foundation · Yokouchi Foundation · Botton Foundation · The Roy H and Lorraine M Okumura Foundation · The Makana Aloha Foundation · Savitt Family Foundation · The Red Cabin Foundation Trust · Bank of Hawaii Charitable Fdn
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rights Education Adoption & Protection for Animal Welfare funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Connecticut Foodshare Inc — 5% of income from government
- Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Rights Education Adoption & Protection for Animal Welfare?
Find your warmest path to Rights Education Adoption & Protection for Animal Welfare through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.