· Private foundation
Rifkin Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k16 grants · $45k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $229k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $266k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS AWARENESS INC | $106,071 |
| FORT WAYNE JEWISH FEDERATION | $100,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY | $60,000 |
| FORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC | $35,000 |
| MIA'S MIRACLES FOUNDATION | $27,785 |
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| INDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| TEACH OUR CHILDREN FUND INC | $25,000 |
| CANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC | $21,100 |
| BLESSINGS IN A BACK PACK INC | $15,300 |
| THE LITERACY ALLIANCE INC | $15,000 |
| FORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC | $15,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $14,910 |
| INT'L ASSOCIATION OF JEWISH GENEALOGICAL SOCIETIES | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 15% of Rifkin Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
35 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NANATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $697k · revenue +41% · 32% of their budget
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY5× · 2020–2024 · $300k · revenue +34%
Indiana University Foundation5× · 2020–2024 · $177k · revenue +162%
Funded once
- FFFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Incgraduated2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +36%
- HFHOOSIERS FOR GOOD INC3× · 2022–2024 · $50k · revenue -73%
- CHCOMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.
To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.
To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northeast Indiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Steuben County Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC ↗
- Who funds FORT WAYNE JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds FORT WAYNE ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Jupiter Medical Center Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CANCER ALLIANCE OF HELP AND HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds TEACH OUR CHILDREN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE LITERACY ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FORT WAYNE PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA INC ↗
- Who funds Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc ↗
- Who funds HOOSIERS FOR GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds MIAS MIRACLES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND ↗
- Who funds BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC ↗
- Who funds FORT WAYNE BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HARVEST FOOD BANK OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds CANTERBURY SCHOOL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HEARING THE OVARIAN CANCER WHISPER INC ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
- Who funds TURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE CENTRAL INC ↗
- Who funds SELFLESS LOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NORTHEAST INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds THE ISRAEL ADVOCACY GROUP ↗
- Who funds JACK MARTIN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SERVICES OF ALLEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds ZETA BETA TAU FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TROY Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Edward M Wilson Foundation · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Howard P Arnold Foundation Inc · The Waterfield Foundation Inc · Dr Louis a and Anne B Schneider Fdn · Kuhne Charles Char Fdn T-W Main · Flora Dale Krouse Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · McComb Family Foundation Inc Att David McComb · McMillen Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rifkin Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.