Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ricoh Americas Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$749kPhilanthropy$189kEmployment$41kHuman Services$32kFood & Nutrition$25kPublic Safety & Disaster$24kHealth$17kArts & Culture$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k23 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$1,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$354k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Scholarship America Inc$100,000
Cristo Rey Philadelphia High School$39,000
Scholarship America Inc$9,420
East Bay Center For The Arts$2,000
Habitat for Humanity$1,500
Love Fund for Children$1,500
Dress for Success Houston$1,500
Milwaukee Public Schools$1,500
Rock Hill School District$1,500
Trinity Cafe$1,500
Hamilton County Special Olympics$1,000
Fact Foundation$1,000
Feed My Starving Children$1,000
Foundation Communities$1,000
Dabos All in Team Foundation$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WASHINGTON AREA SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER: $1k → 12%CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA: $1k → 11%YOUTH VILLAGES: $2k → 14%INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS: $1k → 21%YOUTH VILLAGES: $250 → 14%SISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 12%Dress for Success Houston: $2k → 16%AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Ricoh Americas Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 38% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 35% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Ricoh Americas Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$824k · 14 repeat orgs$301k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
92

Total granted

$824k
$278k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+6%

Still filing today

71%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyFood & NutritionAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL
    3× · 2022–2025 · $144k · revenue +41%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PADRE INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +549%
  • FM
    FEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $3k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY
    one grant, 2020 · $80k · revenue -45%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $38k
  • RU
    RICOH USA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
3
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
4
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
5
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
6
Brazos Valley Food Bank Inc

Cultivate an environment where our community can grow, contribute and thrive together. a more resilient brazos valley where nutritious food and opportunity are attainable for all.

Food & Nutrition
7
America's Second Harvest of the Big Bend Inc

To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.

Food & Nutrition
8
Greater Chicago Food Depository

The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…

Food & Nutrition
9
Community Food Bank of New Jersey Inc

We serve as a champion for addressing the root causes of hunger, delivering neighbor-centric solutions, and fostering collaborative partnerships across all sectors of society for New Jersey.

Food & Nutrition
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
Goodwill Industries of North Central Wisconsin Inc

Eliminating barriers to employment by providing pathways for those who are underserved, underrepresented and disadvantaged who have a goal of building skills that lead to sustained employment and improved financial stability.

Human Services
12
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is G Man Scholarship Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development CentersCommunity Food PantriesImmigrant Worker SupportPolicy Research and AdvocacyCancer Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsMilitary Veterans SupportFood Banks and PantriesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Environmental Conservation …Local History MuseumsSenior Support ServicesAnimal Rescue and ShelterUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%7%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%19%10–20yr16%2%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%55%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/84
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,481

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/75
Grantees still filing
43/75
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $463,624 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INCSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INC — $70,600 · OtherSCHOLARSHIP AMERICA INCIndividual grant recipient — $38,000 · OtherRICOH USA INC — $35,000 · Other+81 more — $122,600 · Other+81 moreUNITED WAY OF CHESTER COUNTY INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CHEST…UNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $80,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREAT…+6 more — $11,000 · Philanthropy+6 moreCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL — $144,000 · EducationCRISTO REY PHILA…CODEORG — $16,300 · EducationCODEORG+2 more — $1,500 · EducationAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,752 · HealthEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC — $2,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $1,000 · HealthNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $1,000 · HealthSAVE A WARRIOR INC — $1,000 · HealthLUPUS RESEARCH ALLIANCE INC — $1,000 · HealthOptimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc — $1,000 · Health+1 more — $175 · HealthYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $1,750 · Human ServicesSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesDRESS FOR SUCCESS HOUSTON — $1,500 · Human ServicesGuilford Native American Association — $1,000 · Human ServicesWashington Area Senior Citizens — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF FLORIDA — $1,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS — $1,000 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS — $1,000 · Human ServicesCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $500 · Human ServicesOzark Food Pantry — $2,000 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $1,500 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS OF BOULDER INC — $1,500 · Food & NutritionFood Bank of Eastern Michigan — $1,500 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHERN VIRGINIA FOOD RESCUE — $1,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $500 · Food & NutritionFRIENDS OF PADRE INC — $3,000 · AnimalsONE LOVE ARIZONA RESCUE ADVOCACY & STERILIZATION — $1,500 · AnimalsTHE BOND BETWEEN — $1,000 · AnimalsSHELTER TO SOLDIER INC — $1,000 · Animals
Other$729,824Philanthropy$191,000Education$161,800Health$17,427Human Services$10,250Food & Nutrition$9,000Animals$6,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL — $144,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CHESTER COUNTY INC — $100,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA AND SOUTHERN NEW JERSEY — $80,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCODEORG — $16,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $6,752 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE IRONMAN FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF PADRE INC — $3,000 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLES AUTISM CHALLENGE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEGRO LEAGUES BASEBALL MUSEUM INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALOHA UNITED WAY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOzark Food Pantry — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOYS FOR TOTS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetEVANSVILLE AFRICAN AMERICAN MUSEUM — $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKLAAS KIDS FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDress for Success Denver — $1,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER CARMEN COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE GEORGIA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF BOULDER INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetL A WORKS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFood Bank of Eastern Michigan — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BROWARD COUNTY INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONE LOVE ARIZONA RESCUE ADVOCACY & STERILIZATION — $1,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN JIMMIE HALE MISSION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMID-IOWA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPeter Pan Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLAKE MONTICELLO VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT AND RESCUE SQUAD INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOSA RIVERKEEPER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGuilford Native American Association — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHEART OF FLORIDA UNITED WAY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAVE A WARRIOR INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH BRIGADE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST REGIONAL ESD FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetOptimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Enterprise Holdings FoundationMO14× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Enterprise Holdings Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · United Way Worldwide · Charities Aid Foundation America · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Assurant Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Synchrony Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ricoh Americas Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • The Children's Home Society of Florida6% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc2% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc2% of income from government
  • Heart of Florida United Way Inc0% of income from government
  • Tsic Inc Dba/Take Stock in Children0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ricoh Americas Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ricoh Americas Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 127 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph