Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard W Erickson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0168% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$14kPublic Benefit$13kHuman Services$13kRecreation & Sports$7kHealth$5kEducation$4kCivil Rights$3kCrime & Legal$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wasatch Parks and Recreation$4,000
Wasatch High School$2,500
Vibrant America$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Continue Mission$2,500
CAF Utah Wingnuts Aviation Museum$2,500
The Horse of Many Colors Cancer Foundation$1,500
Vintage Aviation Museum$1,500
Utah Foster Care$1,000
National Kidney Foundation$1,000
Wasatch County$800
Yellowstone Forever$52
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Vibrant America Inc: $3k → 8%Continue Mission: $5k → 6%Vibrant America Inc: $3k → 8%Continue Mission: $3k → 6%Vibrant America: $3k → 8%Continue Mission: $2k → 6%Utah Foster Care: $1k → 8%Vibrant America: $3k → 8%Utah Foster Care: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$58k · 7 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$58k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+7%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wasatch County
    4× · 2021–2025 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2024 · $11k

Funded once

  • TO
    Tools Of Freedom Inc - Operation Keep Em Rolling
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • HV
    Heber Valley CAF Air Museum
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • PC
    PRIMARY CHILDREN'S CANCER
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
—
2
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
—
3
Run Wild Ranch Sanctuary

Rescued wild mustangs from slaughter and brought them to sanctuary

Animals
4
Utah Venture Outdoors Inc

To inspire the community to get outside and embrace Utahs incredible recreational amenities. We provide unique, local experiences that engage, educate and inspire participants to get outside and live healthy lifestyles.

—
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska supports families with seriously ill children by providing a caring home-away-from-home at the SEattle Ronald McDonald House and operating a house and a van service in…

Health
6
Volcan Mountain Foundation

The Volcan Mountain Foundation's mission is to preserve Volcan Mountain Range in its natural state for all generations.

—
7
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Scenic Montana Trails
—
9
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
10
Happy Camper Foundation
Human Services
11
Roaring Fork Outdoor Volunteers

To Promote Stewardship of our public lands by engaging the community in education, conservation and restoration projects.

—
12
Utah Honor Flight

Enable veterans to visit the war memorials built in their honor. with respect and gratitude to their service and sacrifice.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yellowstone Forever; the most unlike its peers is Vibrant America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Wasatch County: $12,800 · OtherWasatch CountyIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWasatch Parks and Recreation: $4,000 · OtherWasatch Parks and RecreationTools Of Freedom Inc - Operation Keep Em Rolling: $2,745 · OtherHeber Valley CAF Air Museum: $2,500 · OtherCAF Utah Wingnuts Aviation Museum: $2,500 · OtherWasatch High School: $2,500 · OtherPRIMARY CHILDREN'S CANCER: $2,000 · Other+6 more: $4,750 · Other+6 moreVibrant America Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesVibrant America IncCONTINUE MISSION: $9,500 · Human ServicesCONTINUE MISSIONUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $2,000 · Human ServicesUtah Foster Care Foundation In…Vintage Aviation Museum: $1,500 · Arts & CultureRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $1,000 · HealthYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $52 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $25 · Environment
Other$56,895Human Services$21,500Arts & Culture$1,500Health$1,000Environment$77

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVibrant America Inc: $10,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetCONTINUE MISSION: $9,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Vibrant America Inc ↗
  • Who funds CONTINUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Vintage Aviation Museum ↗
  • Who funds Horse of Many Colors ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard W Erickson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard W Erickson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard W Erickson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richard W Erickson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard W Erickson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph