Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Richard W Erickson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What you fund
0168% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Arts & Culture$14kPublic Benefit$13kHuman Services$13kRecreation & Sports$7kHealth$5kEducation$4kCivil Rights$3kCrime & Legal$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Wasatch Parks and Recreation$4,000
CAF Utah Wingnuts Aviation Museum$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Continue Mission$2,500
Vibrant America$2,500
Wasatch High School$2,500
Vintage Aviation Museum$1,500
The Horse of Many Colors Cancer Foundation$1,500
National Kidney Foundation$1,000
Utah Foster Care$1,000
Wasatch County$800
Yellowstone Forever$52
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Vibrant America: $3k → 8%Continue Mission: $5k → 6%Vibrant America Inc: $3k → 8%Continue Mission: $3k → 6%Vibrant America: $3k → 8%Continue Mission: $2k → 6%Utah Foster Care: $1k → 8%Vibrant America Inc: $3k → 8%Utah Foster Care: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$58k · 7 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$58k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+7%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEnvironmentArts & CultureHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WC
    Wasatch County
    4× · 2021–2025 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2021–2025 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2024 · $11k

Funded once

  • TO
    Tools Of Freedom Inc - Operation Keep Em Rolling
    one grant, 2021 · $3k
  • HV
    Heber Valley CAF Air Museum
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • PC
    PRIMARY CHILDREN'S CANCER
    one grant, 2019 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Utah Geological Foundation
2
Northern Utah Cancer Foundation
3
Run Wild Ranch Sanctuary

Rescued wild mustangs from slaughter and brought them to sanctuary

Animals
4
Utah Venture Outdoors Inc

To inspire the community to get outside and embrace Utahs incredible recreational amenities. We provide unique, local experiences that engage, educate and inspire participants to get outside and live healthy lifestyles.

5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Western Washington & Alaska supports families with seriously ill children by providing a caring home-away-from-home at the SEattle Ronald McDonald House and operating a house and a van service in…

Health
6
Volcan Mountain Foundation

The Volcan Mountain Foundation's mission is to preserve Volcan Mountain Range in its natural state for all generations.

7
Utah Motorsports Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Scenic Montana Trails
9
Utah Public Lands Alliance
Education
10
Happy Camper Foundation
Human Services
11
Roaring Fork Outdoor Volunteers

To Promote Stewardship of our public lands by engaging the community in education, conservation and restoration projects.

12
Utah Honor Flight

Enable veterans to visit the war memorials built in their honor. with respect and gratitude to their service and sacrifice.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yellowstone Forever and the most unlike its peers is Vibrant America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Wasatch County — $12,800 · OtherWasatch CountyIndividual grant recipient — $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $10,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWasatch Parks and Recreation — $4,000 · OtherWasatch Parks and RecreationTools Of Freedom Inc - Operation Keep Em Rolling — $2,745 · OtherWasatch High School — $2,500 · OtherHeber Valley CAF Air Museum — $2,500 · OtherCAF Utah Wingnuts Aviation Museum — $2,500 · OtherPRIMARY CHILDREN'S CANCER — $2,000 · Other+6 more — $4,750 · Other+6 moreVibrant America Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesVibrant America IncCONTINUE MISSION — $9,500 · Human ServicesCONTINUE MISSIONUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc — $2,000 · Human ServicesUtah Foster Care Foundation In…Vintage Aviation Museum — $1,500 · Arts & CultureRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc — $1,000 · HealthYELLOWSTONE FOREVER — $52 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $25 · Environment
Other$56,895Human Services$21,500Arts & Culture$1,500Health$1,000Environment$77

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVibrant America Inc — $10,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetCONTINUE MISSION — $9,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetUtah Foster Care Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER — $52 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Vibrant America Inc
  • Who funds CONTINUE MISSION
  • Who funds Utah Foster Care Foundation Inc
  • Who funds Vintage Aviation Museum
  • Who funds Horse of Many Colors
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of the Intermountain Area Inc
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER
  • Who funds NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Richard W Erickson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard W Erickson Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richard W Erickson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph