Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard W and Irene Rooker Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$212kArts & Culture$92kHealth$50kYouth Development$48kReligion$30kRecreation & Sports$28kPhilanthropy$23kHuman Services$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$924k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KCV CYCLING CLUB INC$10,000
NATIONAL HISTORY DAY$10,000
FREMONT HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
ACCESS TO ACHIEVEMENT EDUCATION$10,000
KOSCIUSKO CARES YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU$10,000
OLD FORT NIAGARA ASSOC INC$10,000
ADA HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$10,000
NATIONAL HISTORY DAY$10,000
LIFESOURCE$5,000
CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER$5,000
CAMP TAYLOR INC$5,000
MAY DUGAN CENTER$5,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MAY DUGAN CENTER: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $5k → 17%CLEVELAND SIGHT CENTER: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
MD
SC
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$479k · 19 repeat orgs$45k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
5

Total granted

$479k
$35k

Still filing today

42%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationHealthCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    National History Day Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $49k · revenue +224%
  • IH
    INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +173%
  • OF
    OLD FORT NIAGARA ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $40k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • OF
    OLD FORT NIAGARA ASSOCIATION INCORPORATE
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • KC
    KOSCIUSKO CARES YOUTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF KOSCIUSKO COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Museum of Industrial History

The mission of the national museum of industrial history, in affiliation with the smithsonian institute is: to forge a connection between america's industrial past and the innovations of today by educating the public and inspiring the…

Arts & Culture
2
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
3
The National Park Service Employee and Alumni Trust Fund

Foster, maintain and improve the morale of nps employees and to promote close ties with current nps members and nps alumni.

—
4
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
5
North Shore Health System Medical Faculty Group Practice

North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…

Health
6
Natural History Institute

Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…

Arts & Culture
7
Harvard Conservation Trust

To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.

Environment
8
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
9
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
10
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
11
Indiana University Health North Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
12
Health Care Without Harm

The mission of health care without harm (hcwh) is to transform health care worldwide so that it reduces its environmental footprint, becomes a community anchor for sustainability and a leader in the global movement for environmental health…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Riverbend Equine Therapy. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACCESS TO ACHIEVEMENT EDUCATION: $78,000 · OtherACCESS TO ACHIEVEMENT EDUCATIONFREMONT HIGH SCHOOL: $53,000 · OtherFREMONT HIGH SCHOOLOLD FORT NIAGARA ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 · OtherOLD FORT NIAGARA ASSOCIATION INCKOSCIUSKO CARES YOUTH SERVICES BUREAU: $37,500 · OtherKOSCIUSKO CARES YOUTH SERVICES BUREAUADA HIGH SCHOOL: $32,000 · OtherADA HIGH SCHOOLLIFE SOURCE INC: $25,000 · OtherLIFE SOURCE INCIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · Other+13 more: $88,500 · Other+13 moreNational History Day Inc: $49,000 · EducationNational Hi…President and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 · EducationPresident a…INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $45,000 · Arts & CultureINDIANA HI…Riverbend Equine Therapy: $7,000 · Arts & CultureRiverbend …Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama: $23,000 · PhilanthropyKCV CYCLING CLUB INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $15,000 · Human ServicesNear Westside MultiService Corp: $5,000 · Human ServicesNIAGARA FALLS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER: $15,000 · Health
Other$369,000Education$54,000Arts & Culture$52,000Philanthropy$23,000Recreation & Sports$20,000Human Services$20,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational History Day Inc: $49,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetINDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $45,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOLD FORT NIAGARA ASSOCIATION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northeast Alabama: $23,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetKCV CYCLING CLUB INC: $20,000 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetCLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNIAGARA FALLS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $12,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRiverbend Equine Therapy: $7,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCAMP TAYLOR INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds National History Day Inc ↗
  • Who funds INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds OLD FORT NIAGARA ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama ↗
  • Who funds KCV CYCLING CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND SOCIETY FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds NIAGARA FALLS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds Riverbend Equine Therapy ↗
  • Who funds CAMP TAYLOR INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Near Westside MultiService Corp ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard W and Irene Rooker Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard W and Irene Rooker Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • National History Day Inc: 13% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Richard W and Irene Rooker Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Richard W and Irene Rooker Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard W and Irene Rooker Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph