Loading…
· Private foundation
RICHARD M & ANDREW S COHEN FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$14k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
2
Communities
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 63% of RICHARD M & ANDREW S COHEN FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$1,800
Median grant
2
States reached
$36k
Total assets
Largest grants
- EQUALITY NOW INC$5,000
- BIG VISION FOUNDATION$3,600
- LUBAVITCH MESIVTA OF CHICAGO (YESHIVAS OHR ELIYAHU)$1,800
- TORAH 24 INC$1,800
- MARGARETVILLE HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,800
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 98% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$257k · 3 repeat orgs$392k to everyone else
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
11
Total granted
$257k
$378k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
-75%
+72%
Still filing today
33%
36%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
InternationalPhilanthropyEmploymentReligionHealthOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TRTHE RAPE FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2022 · $250k · revenue -75%
- EIEZRAT ISRAEL2× · 2017–2018 · $4k
- CCCOLEL CHABAD2× · 2017–2018 · $4k
Funded once
- COCITY OF BEVERLY HILLS COMMUNITY CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +46%
- MHMYKEREN HASHLUCHIM INCone grant, 2018 · $72k
- MSMOUNT SINAI CONGREGATIONone grant, 2018 · $36k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Judicial Watch Inc
To promote integrity, transparency and accountability in government and fidelity to the rule of law through public advocacy, litigation, and monitoring and investigating federal, state and local government entities and officials, among…
Public Benefit
2
Human Rights Voices
To draw attention to victims of human rights abuse, make transparent the united nation's record on its promise to identify and condemn human rights violations, and to provide an information base and direction for modern-day democratic…
International
3
Fund for Global Human Rights Inc
Human rights advocacy
International
4
Global Health Council
Global health council is the leading membership organization supporting and connecting advocates, implementers, and stakeholders around global health priorities worldwide. the global health council, inc. (the "council"ghc") was…
International
5
Human Rights Campaign Foundation
Research, advocacy and education to support and protect lgbtq+ individuals and families.
Civil Rights
6
Global Policy Forum Inc
Research and education of United Nations activities
International
7
Human Rights Law Foundation
The Human Rights Law Foundation uses strategic litigation and targeted advocacy to ensure perpetrators of human rights violations are brought to justice. Recently, HRLF has focused on the impact of propaganda on atrocity crimes in the 20th…
International
8
Campaign for Human Rights Inc
To promote international human rights standards to ensure a culture of respect for human dignity and rights of all and to hold iranian state actors accountable to their international obligations.
International
9
World Health Foundation
—
10
International Humanity Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Humanitarian China
Humanitarian China's goal is to help Chinese Human Rights Defenders, Humanitarian China has helped over 1000 cases worldwide. Humanitarian China strives to raise awareness of China's ever deteriorating human rights situation.
International
12
The Lawfare Project Inc
We are a global network of legal professionals that contribute our skills time and expertise to defending the civil and human rights of the jewish people and fighting discrimination wherever we see it.
International
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Skin Cancer Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Human Rights Watch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$410,800Philanthropy$200,000Employment$18,000International$16,800Religion$1,800Health$1,800
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation RICHARD M & ANDREW S COHEN FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TORAH 24 INC.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~3 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 4 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 852736830 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on TORAH 24 INC, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 3 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Richard M & Andrew S Cohen Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Richard M & Andrew S Cohen Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines