Skip to content
Richard L & F Annette Scott Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Richard L & F Annette Scott Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Animals$216kReligion$60kEducation$40kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$11kYouth Development$10kEnvironment$3kHousing & Shelter$1kOther$0
02FY2022 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAPLES COMMUNITY CHURCH$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 11%LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$288k · 5 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
11

Total granted

$288k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+107%
+124%

Still filing today

40%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
AnimalsEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NZ
    NAPLES ZOO INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $216k · revenue +73%
  • NC
    NAPLES COMMUNITY CHURCH INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $60k
  • LY
    LIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $10k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • TV
    THE VILLAGE SCHOOL OF NAPLES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +124%
  • SF
    SOUTHWEST FLORIDA COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -11%
  • GC
    GOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +123%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pediatric Specialty Group Inc

Pediatric specialty group, inc. (d/b/a nicklaus children's pediatric specialists ("ncps")) is a physician-directed, multi-specialty pediatric group with a regional, national, and international presence in providing pediatric-centric care…

—
2
Naples Art Association Inc

Naples art institute is a place to discover, learn about, and engage with the art of our time. (continued on schedule o).as a cornerstone of naples' cultural landscape, we welcome artists, students, and visitors to explore the powerful…

Arts & Culture
3
Boys & Girls Club of Collier County Flor

To empower all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.

Youth Development
4
Naples Christian Academy Association Inc

The mission of naples christian academy is to partner with christian parents to develop students with hearts impassioned to love god, minds disciplined to think biblically, and hands prepared to serve.

Education
5
The Florida Aquarium Inc

The florida aquarium's mission focuses on our shared purpose of a commitment to save marine wildlife, with a vision to be florida's leading conservation-based aquarium. (continued on schedule o)

Animals
6
Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce Inc

"to help make naples the best place in america to work and live." the greater naples chamber of commerce (the chamber) is a non-profit organization providing services to our members and our community. we strive to fulill the needs of our…

—
7
Florida Alliance of Children's Councils & Trusts Inc

To promote policies that build effective primary prevention and early intervention systems of support for florida's children and families by engaging and enhancing the collective strengths of the individual children's services councils of…

—
8
Naples Community Hospital Inc

Helping everyone live a longer, happier, and healthier life.

Health
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
11
Royal Palm Academy Inc

The mission of royal palm academy is to partner with families to provide an education of rich academics with catholic formation. we teach the mind, educate the heart, and form the character of tomorrow's leaders.

Human Services
12
Community School of Naples Inc

The vision of community school of naples is to be a world-class independent school, meeting our mission in memorable ways for the benefit of every student, every day.committed to academic excellence, community school of naples inspires and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Children Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Liberty Youth Ranch Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAPLES ZOO INC: $215,920 · AnimalsNAPLES ZOO INCNAPLES COMMUNITY CHURCH INC: $60,000 · OtherNAPLES COMMUNITY CHURCH INCSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · OtherSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COUNCIL I…SMU COX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS: $10,000 · OtherSMU COX SCHOOL OF BUSINESS+7 more: $5,002 · Other+7 moreTHE VILLAGE SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $29,700 · EducationTHE VILLA…GOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $1,116 · Housing & Shelter
Animals$215,920Other$85,002Education$29,700Arts & Culture$10,000Human Services$10,000Environment$2,500Housing & Shelter$1,116

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNAPLES ZOO INC: $215,920 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE VILLAGE SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC: $29,700 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTHWEST FLORIDA COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOLISANO CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NAPLES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetLIBERTY YOUTH RANCH INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $1,116 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Collier Community Fou…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Collier Community Foundation IncFL15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard L & F Annette Scott Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard L & F Annette Scott Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Southwest Florida Council Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard L & F Annette Scott’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home