Skip to content
Richard Brooke Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

Richard Brooke Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
66
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$8.3MEducation$6.1MAnimals$5.2MHuman Services$5.2MHealth$4.8MFood & Nutrition$3.3MYouth Development$2.6MHousing & Shelter$1.0MOther$0
02FY2025 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $480k
  • $50k–250k49 grants · $4.9M
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$80,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000,000
ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC$300,000
COLLEGE OF THE DESERT FOUNDATION$200,000
CAMP FOSTERYMCA OF THE OKOBOJIS$182,500
FOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC (DBA FIND FOOD BANK)$175,000
FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND$150,000
AVENUE SCHOLERS FOUNDATION$150,000
LIVING DESERT$150,000
AMERICAN MIDWEST BALLET$150,000
ASSISTANCE LENGUE OF OMAHA$150,000
NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION$125,000
OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC$125,000
COLLEGE POSSIBLE OMAHA$125,000
NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY$120,000
NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION$115,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $5.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%CAMP FOSTERYMCA OF THE OKOBOJIS: $2.0M → 7%CAMP FOSTERYMCA OF THE OKOBOJIS: $321k → 7%CAMP FOSTERYMCA OF THE OKOBOJIS: $255k → 7%CAMP FOSTERYMCA OF THE OKOBOJIS: $200k → 7%CAMP FOSTERYMCA OF THE OKOBOJIS: $183k → 7%CAMP FOSTERYMCA OF THE OKOBOJIS: $100k → 7%CAMP FOSTERYMCA OF THE OKOBOJIS: $91k → 7%CAMP FOSTERYMCA OF THE OKOBOJIS: $50k → 7%CAMP FOSTERYMCA OF THE OKOBOJIS: $50k → 7%OMAHA HOME FOR BOYS: $25k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $200k → 12%CHILD SAVING IINSTITUTE: $115k → 12%CHILD SAVING IINSTITUTE: $115k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $94k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $87k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUE: $85k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $82k → 12%CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE: $82k → 12%ASSISTANCE LENGUE OF OMAHE: $125k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA: $110k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA: $110k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA: $100k → 12%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA: $80k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $100k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $100k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $100k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $85k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $75k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $75k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $75k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $75k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $60k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $60k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $60k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $55k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $55k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $55k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $55k → 12%WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $50k → 12%YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Richard Brooke Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in NE; by stated purpose, 63%.

Richard Brooke Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$38M · 72 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

72 repeat relationships: 51 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

72
18

Total granted

$38M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+45%

Still filing today

79%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $225k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $3.3M · revenue +50%
  • NH
    NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +17%
  • OC
    ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $2.3M · revenue +94%

Funded once

  • OD
    OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST CO HERITAGE SERVICES
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
  • CI
    COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -89%
  • SA
    STRATEGIC AIR AND SPACE MUSEUM
    one grant, 2024 · $108k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
One Omaha

One omaha empowers people where they live with education, training, and engagement to develop thriving neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
2
Lincoln Children's Museum

The lincoln children's museum invites children to create, discover and learn through the power of play.

Arts & Culture
3
Omaha Community Foundation

To serve the community by cultivating generosity and strengthening nonprofits.

Philanthropy
4
Stand for Schools

Stand for schools supports nebraska's public schools, working to advance policies that make them stronger while opposing policies that would weaken them.

Education
5
Omaha Botanical Center Inc

We believe in thoughtful, ecologically-minded practices and the curation of accessible, educational, and inspirational experiences that enhance lives.

Environment
6
Cedar Rapids Museum of Art

To excite, engage and educate through the arts.

Arts & Culture
7
Omaha Bridges Out of Poverty Inc

Empowering under-resourced families to change their lives by discovering and overcoming barriers to success.

Human Services
8
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
9
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
10
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
11
Nebraska Alliance of Child Advocacy Centers

To enhance nebraska's response to child abuse.

Crime & Legal
12
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Children's Museum; the most unlike its peers is Learning for All. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
70/71
Grantees still filing
49/71
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $2,285,137 · OtherONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INCFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $1,485,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLANDFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC (DBA FIND FOOD BANK): $1,205,835 · OtherFOOD IN NEED OF DISTRIBUTION INC (DBA FIND…COLLEGE POSSIBLE OMAHA: $590,000 · OtherMCCALLUM THEATER: $580,000 · OtherOMAHA PERFORMING ARTS: $535,000 · OtherOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST CO HERITAGE SERVICES: $500,000 · OtherNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $695,000 · OtherLIVING DESERT THE: $632,000 · Other+38 more: $6,403,800 · Other+38 moreCamp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc: $3,270,871 · Human ServicesCamp Foster Youn…CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $859,398 · Human ServicesCHILD SAVING INS…YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $705,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH EMERGENCY …ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC: $525,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGU…WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $480,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S CENTER F…+1 more: $25,164 · Human ServicesKANEKO: $875,000 · Arts & CultureKANEKOOMAHA THEATER COMPANY: $835,000 · Arts & CultureOMAHA THEATER CO…BALLET NEBRASKA: $825,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET NEBRASKAGALLERY 1516 OF REGIONAL ARTISTS INC: $775,000 · Arts & CultureGALLERY 1516 OF …OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $685,871 · Arts & CultureOMAHA CONSERVATO…THE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $624,270 · Arts & CultureTHE UNION FOR CO…THE DURHAM MUSEUM: $350,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DURHAM MUSEU…Omaha Children's Museum: $310,000 · Arts & CultureOmaha Children's…+4 more: $370,000 · Arts & Culture+4 moreNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,533,117 · AnimalsNEBRASKA HUMA…Animal Samaritans: $1,322,091 · AnimalsAnimal Samari…ANIMAL ACTION LEAGUE: $635,000 · AnimalsANIMAL ACTION…+4 more: $162,000 · AnimalsCollege of the Desert Foundation: $1,525,000 · EducationCollege of …AVENUE SCHOLARS: $950,000 · EducationAVENUE SCHO…THE PALM VALLEY SCHOOL: $715,000 · EducationTHE PALM VA…CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA: $310,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S …OMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST: $225,000 · EducationOMAHA DISCO…COMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $200,000 · Education+3 more: $115,000 · EducationGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $735,000 · Youth DevelopmentNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $675,753 · Youth DevelopmentCOMPLETELY KIDS: $515,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY: $255,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEBRASKA YOUTH JUSTICE INITIATIVE DBA RADIUS: $100,000 · Youth Development+3 more: $102,000 · Youth DevelopmentPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $1,110,000 · HealthHARBOR HOUSE: $525,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES: $150,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $100,000 · Health
Other$14,911,772Human Services$5,865,433Arts & Culture$5,650,141Animals$4,652,208Education$4,040,000Youth Development$2,382,753Health$1,885,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCamp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc: $3,270,871 over 8y, 20% of budgetNEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,533,117 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC: $2,285,137 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetCollege of the Desert Foundation: $1,525,000 over 8y, 7.2% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND: $1,485,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetAnimal Samaritans: $1,322,091 over 8y, 8.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC: $1,110,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetAVENUE SCHOLARS: $950,000 over 8y, 3.4% of budgetKANEKO: $875,000 over 7y, 22% of budgetCHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC: $859,398 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetOMAHA THEATER COMPANY: $835,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetBALLET NEBRASKA: $825,000 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetGALLERY 1516 OF REGIONAL ARTISTS INC: $775,000 over 8y, 32% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA: $735,000 over 8y, 2.4% of budgetTHE PALM VALLEY SCHOOL: $715,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetYOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $705,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetNEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $695,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetOMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $685,871 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $675,753 over 8y, 2.5% of budgetANIMAL ACTION LEAGUE: $635,000 over 8y, 9.7% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $632,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC: $624,270 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetHARBOR HOUSE: $525,000 over 7y, 2.8% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC: $525,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetCOMPLETELY KIDS: $515,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetWOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT: $480,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetFILM STREAMS INC: $455,114 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetCASA FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY: $415,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetNO MORE EMPTY POTS: $410,484 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $360,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetTHE DURHAM MUSEUM: $350,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetOmaha Children's Museum: $310,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA: $310,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $277,568 over 8y, 12% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY: $255,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetOMAHA DISCOVERY TRUST: $225,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetSHELTERING TREE INC: $209,253 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY INFORMATION TRUST: $200,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCITY SPROUTS INC: $160,000 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetBULL TERRIER RESCUE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $155,000 over 3y, 90% of budgetCOMMUNITY ALLIANCE REHABILITATION SERVICES: $150,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetBROWNELL-TALBOT SCHOOL: $140,164 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAUTISM ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $140,000 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE MIDLANDS: $135,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSTRATEGIC AIR COMMAND & AEROSPACE MUSEUM: $110,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $110,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNEBRASKA YOUTH JUSTICE INITIATIVE DBA RADIUS: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF PALM SPRINGS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: $100,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Camp Foster Young Mens Christian Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ONEWORLD COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds College of the Desert Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR THE HEARTLAND ↗
  • Who funds Animal Samaritans ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds AVENUE SCHOLARS ↗
  • Who funds KANEKO ↗
  • Who funds CHILD SAVING INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA THEATER COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds BALLET NEBRASKA ↗
  • Who funds GALLERY 1516 OF REGIONAL ARTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds THE PALM VALLEY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CHILDREN & FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL ACTION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION FOR CONTEMPORARY ART INC ↗
  • Who funds HARBOR HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF OMAHA NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPLETELY KIDS ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds FILM STREAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds CASA FOR DOUGLAS COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds NO MORE EMPTY POTS ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST ↗
  • Who funds THE DURHAM MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationThe Sherwood Foundati…Robert B Daugherty Fo…Weitz Family Foundati…The Charles and Mary …The Holland FoundationThe Hawks FoundationMutual of Omaha Found…Peter Kiewit Foundati…Suzanne & Walter Scot…Gilbert M and Martha …Leland J & Dorothy H …
The Lozier FoundationNE87.4× affinity41 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Weitz Family Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Holland Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Mutual of Omaha Foundation · Peter Kiewit Foundation · Suzanne & Walter Scott Foundation · Gilbert M and Martha H Hitchcock Foundation · Leland J & Dorothy H Olson Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard Brooke Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard Brooke Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Richard Brooke Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Richard Brooke Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard Brooke’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home