Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard Barton Law Memorial Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$105kYouth Development$60kEducation$46kHuman Services$42kReligion$21kPhilanthropy$18kCivil Rights$14kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$546k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA OF THE GREAT LAKES BAY REGION$2,500
SVSU FOUNDATION$2,500
BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION$2,500
BLOOD CANCER FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN$2,000
LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN$2,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS GLB REGION$2,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN$2,000
EAGLE VILLAGE$2,000
GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN$1,500
MICHIGAN CROSSROADS COUNCIL$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 18%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $1k → 18%YWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $1k → 14%YWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $1k → 14%YWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $1k → 14%YWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $1k → 14%YWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $1k → 14%YWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$317k · 27 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
3

Total granted

$317k
$5k

Still filing today

59%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MB
    MCLAREN BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +16%
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Great Lakes Bay Region
    9× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +9%
  • EV
    Eagle Village Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +118%

Funded once

  • CL
    CHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FD OF MICH
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • CM
    CS MOTT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $2k
  • NM
    N MICHIGAN MOBILE CHILD ADVOCACY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Assoc of Community Mental Health Boards

Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.

—
2
Laborers International Union of State of Mi

Collective bargaining and representation

—
3
Michigan Anti-Cruelty Society

To maintain and operate a hospital, ambulance and veterinary services for the care of animals. the maintenance and operation of kennels and suitable chambers for the humane destruction of wounded animals.

Animals
4
Great Lakes Community Action Partnership

The mission of great lakes community action partnership is to create partnerships and opportunites to help individuals, families and communities thrive.

Human Services
5
Lakeshore Legal Aid

Standing with our neighbors, Lakeshore Legal Aid fights poverty and injustice through advocacy and by providing meaningful and dignified access to the legal system.

Crime & Legal
6
Michigan Chamber of Commerce

To promote conditions favorable to job creation and business success in michigan.

—
7
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
8
Mid Michigan Community Action Agency Inc

Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.

—
9
Barry County United Way

None

Philanthropy
10
Bay-Lakes Council #635 Boy Scouts of America

To instill in young people; values, develop leadership skills, and ethical character as expressed in the scout oath and law.

Youth Development
11
Michigan Pharmacists Association

To encourage and support its members as professionals responsible for the delivery of patient-focused care.

—
12
Michigan State Afl-Cio Workforce Development Institute

To apply the principles of workforce development to grow michigan's economy while improving the lives of michigan workers.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bay Area Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
15/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SVSU FOUNDATION: $22,500 · OtherSVSU FOUNDATIONFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $21,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHMCLAREN BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherMCLAREN BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN: $18,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGANBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Great Lakes Bay Region: $17,500 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Great Lakes Bay RegionEagle Village Inc: $15,500 · OtherEagle Village IncBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $14,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREAT LAKES BAY REGIONBAY ARENAC ISD EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTER: $14,000 · OtherBAY ARENAC ISD EDUCATIONAL SERVICE CENTERMICHIGAN CROSSROADS COUNCIL: $13,500 · OtherMICHIGAN CROSSROADS COUNCILAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: $11,000 · OtherFISH TALES: $9,500 · OtherDISABILITY SERVICES RESOURCE CENTER: $9,000 · OtherCHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $9,000 · OtherMICHIGAN ALLIANCE FC: $8,000 · Other+8 more: $33,500 · Other+8 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $11,000 · HealthAmerican …CHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $10,000 · HealthCHILDREN'…LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8,000 · HealthLEUKEMIA …WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesHIDDEN HARVEST: $9,000 · Human ServicesYWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $6,000 · Human ServicesBAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $17,500 · PhilanthropyGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $13,500 · Youth DevelopmentMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,500 · InternationalLITERACY COUNCIL OF BAY COUNTY INC: $9,000 · Education
Other$236,500Health$29,000Human Services$26,000Philanthropy$17,500Youth Development$13,500International$9,500Education$9,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMCLAREN BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of the Great Lakes Bay Region: $17,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEagle Village Inc: $15,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $14,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN: $13,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $11,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN: $10,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFISH TALES: $9,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $9,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDISABILITY SERVICES RESOURCE CENTER: $9,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetHIDDEN HARVEST: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF BAY COUNTY INC: $9,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $6,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MCLAREN BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Great Lakes Bay Region ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Eagle Village Inc ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREAT LAKES BAY REGION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS HEART OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LEUKEMIA FOUNDATION OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds FISH TALES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DISABILITY SERVICES RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds HIDDEN HARVEST ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE & NEGLECT COUNCIL GREAT LAKES BAY REGION ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF BAY COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN ALLIANCE FC ↗
  • Who funds LEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI21.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Bay Area Community Foundation · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation · Nickless Family Charitable Foundation · Gougeon Employees Foundation · United Way of Bay County · Alden and Vada Dow Fund · Saginaw Community Foundation · Midland Area Community Foundation · Thompson Margaret C Charitable · Allison K Short Foundation · United Way of Saginaw County

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard Barton Law Memorial Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard Barton Law Memorial Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Richard Barton Law Memorial Trust?

Find your warmest path to Richard Barton Law Memorial Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard Barton Law Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph