Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of Saginaw County

Our mission is to increase the organized capacity of people to care for one another.

$924k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Human Services$1.9MEmployment$415kEducation$347kYouth Development$303kHousing & Shelter$188kFood & Nutrition$166kHealth$10k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $510,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $923,897 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $413,897 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $304k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $206k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU$75,000
CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES$74,000
SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU$57,000
HIDDEN HARVEST$40,000
HOUGHTON JONES NEIGHBORHOOD TASK FO$35,000
YWCA GLBR$30,000
CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES$25,500
PARTNERSHIFT$25,000
UNDERGROUND RAILROAD$25,000
SAGINAW SHIAWASSEE HABITAT FOR HUMA$25,000
CAN COUNCIL GLBR$22,500
READ ASSOCIATION$20,000
READ ASSOCIATION$20,000
READ ASSOCIATION$16,000
SAGINAW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SAMARITAS COMMUNITY CENTER: $17k → 18%SAMARITAS COMMUNITY CENTER: $12k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $80k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $75k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $75k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $75k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $75k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $75k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $75k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $71k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $71k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $71k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $57k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $57k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $57k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $55k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $55k → 18%SAGINAW COUNTY YOUTH PROTECTION COU: $55k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD: $55k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD: $55k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD: $55k → 18%UNDERGROUND RAILROAD: $25k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $80k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $74k → 18%CHILD & FAMILY SERVICES: $26k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.2M · 12 repeat orgs$38k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
1

Total granted

$3.2M
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+12%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEmploymentEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Child & Family Service of Saginaw
    6× · 2020–2025 · $623k · revenue +10%
  • SC
    SAGINAW COUNTY BUSINESS & EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $415k · revenue +7%
  • UR
    UNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $190k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • S
    SAMARITAS
    one grant, 2020 · $28k · revenue +12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saginaw County Chamber of Commerce

To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.

2
Lincoln Behavioral Services

To provide comprehensive outpatient mental health services to over 5400 individuals and their families in a consumer driven person centered delivery system. Approximately 15% of our staff members are our clients who are involved in a…

Health
3
Saginaw Public Libraries Foundation

Support library activities through materials and services

4
United Way of Marquette County

Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…

5
Michigan Family Resources

Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.

Education
6
Great Lakes Bay Health Centers

To provide high quality health care to individuals and community groups in Saginaw, Bay, and other nearby counties. Services are provided without regard to race, beliefs or ability to pay.

Health
7
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County

Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…

8
Girl Scouts Heart of Michigan

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character, who make the world a better place

Youth Development
9
Young Mens Christian Assoc-Saginaw

The YMCA of Saginaw is an association of all people united in a common effort to put Judeo-Christian principles into practice through programs that enrich the spirit mind and body for all.

Human Services
10
South Peninsula Behavioral Health Services Inc

The organization operates primarily on the Southern Kenai Peninsula and its operations include the following:Community Mental Health - Counseling, evaluation, consultation and crisis mental health services for Adults and…

Health
11
Historical Society of Saginaw County

The historical society of saginaw county is committed to serve the community by telling the continuing story of the people of the saginaw region through exploration, preservation and presentation of their historical and cultural heritage.

12
St Johns Community Center

to provide food and shelter for the homeless of Detroit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saginaw Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Houghton Jones Neighborhood Task Force Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Saginaw County Youth Protection Council — $786,000 · Human ServicesSaginaw County Youth Protection CouncilChild & Family Service of Saginaw — $622,500 · Human ServicesChild & Family Service of SaginawUNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC — $190,000 · Human ServicesUNDERGROUND RAILROAD INCYWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION — $172,500 · Human ServicesYWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGIONHIDDEN HARVEST — $166,000 · Human ServicesHIDDEN HARVEST+1 more — $28,389 · Human ServicesSAGINAW COUNTY BUSINESS & EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC — $415,000 · EmploymentSAGINAW COUNTY…SAGINAW-SHIAWASSEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $187,500 · OtherSAGINAW-SHIAW…First Ward Community Service — $102,500 · OtherFirst Ward Co…CAN COUNCIL GLBR — $64,500 · OtherCAN COUNCIL G…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREAT LAKES BAY REGION — $17,500 · Other+1 more — $10,000 · OtherREAD Association of Saginaw County — $347,333 · EducationREAD Associ…Houghton Jones Neighborhood Task Force Inc — $172,500 · Community ImprovementSaginaw Community Foundation — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$1,965,389Employment$415,000Other$382,000Education$347,333Community Improvement$172,500Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSaginaw County Youth Protection Council — $786,000 over 6y, 8.7% of budgetChild & Family Service of Saginaw — $622,500 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetSAGINAW COUNTY BUSINESS & EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP INC — $415,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetREAD Association of Saginaw County — $347,333 over 6y, 60% of budgetUNDERGROUND RAILROAD INC — $190,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetSAGINAW-SHIAWASSEE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $187,500 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetHoughton Jones Neighborhood Task Force Inc — $172,500 over 6y, 31% of budgetYWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION — $172,500 over 6y, 20% of budgetHIDDEN HARVEST — $166,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetFirst Ward Community Service — $102,500 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetSAMARITAS — $28,389 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE GREAT LAKES BAY REGION — $17,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saginaw Community FoundationMI26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saginaw Community Foundation · Boutell Memorial Fund · Bay Area Community Foundation · Frances Goll Mills Fund · Alice E Turner Memorial Trust · Alden and Vada Dow Fund · Wm McNally Family Foundation · Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Frank N Andersen Foundation · Tri-Star Charitable Foundation · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of Saginaw County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph