Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard B Messer FBO Pennock Hospital

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$296kHuman Services$221kEducation$136kArts & Culture$84kHealth$80kPhilanthropy$67kYouth Development$51kReligion$2k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $89k
$13,814
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF BARRY COUNTY$15,000
LIGHTHOUSE ACADEMY$15,000
CASA FOR KIDS INC$15,000
YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BARRY$15,000
BARRY COMMUNITY TRIAL COURT INITIATIVE INC$15,000
CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION$13,814
ST ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC SCHOOL$5,000
THORNAPPLE ARTS COUNCIL OF BARRY COUNTY$5,000
GREEN GABLES HAVEN$5,000
THORNAPPLE VALLEY CHURCH$2,000
NOAH'S ARK PRESCHOOL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%GREEN GABLES HAVEN: $7k → 9%GREEN GABLES HAVEN: $5k → 9%GREEN GABLES HAVEN: $5k → 9%GREEN GABLES HAVEN: $4k → 9%GREEN GABLES HAVEN: $4k → 9%GREEN GABLES HAVEN: $4k → 9%GREEN GABLES HAVEN: $4k → 9%GREEN GABLES HAVEN: $4k → 9%GREEN GABLES HAVEN: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$818k · 19 repeat orgs$52k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
4

Total granted

$818k
$36k

Still filing today

37%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Civil RightsHealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF BARRY COUNTY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $103k · revenue +47%
  • CF
    CASA FOR KIDS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $91k · revenue +181%
  • GG
    GREEN GABLES HAVEN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $41k · revenue +96%

Funded once

  • HA
    HASTINGS AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
  • SH
    SPECTRUM HEALTH FOUNDATION PENNOCK
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • CH
    COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barry County United Way

None

Philanthropy
2
Berrien County Council for Children

The mission of the children's advocacy center of southwest michigan is to support children through a coordinated response to child abuse and neglect that includes prevention, assessment and intervention.

—
3
Michigan Casa Inc

Michigan casa, inc. is dedicated to changing the lives of abused and neglected children by advocating for their best interests through establishing, supporting, and expanding quality casa programs throughout the state of michigan to ensure…

Civil Rights
4
Morgan County Child Advocacy Center

To provide a safe caring place to evaluate any child who may have been abused

Crime & Legal
5
Casa of Kent County Inc

The recruitment, training, and support of community volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children who are temporary or permanent wards of the court in Kent County, Michigan.

Civil Rights
6
Harbor Country Chamber of Commerce

To promote business and economic development for eight towns in southwest michigan.

—
7
Family Safety Network of Cass County Inc

To provide domestic abuse advocacy to parents and children of cass, hubbard and clearwater counties.

Human Services
8
Bcec Inc

Bcec inc. provides meeting and office space to non-profit and community groups that provide services and programs to residents of barry county.

Philanthropy
9
Barnabas Center

Christian counseling ministry

Religion
10
Serenity Village of Barry County

To provide terminally ill patients and their loved ones dignity and peace during their final days in a compassionate surrounding.

Health
11
Citizens Mediation Service Inc

Citizens mediation service, inc.'s mission is to successfully resolve conflict through mediation services that facilitate lasting, positive solutions by empowering the residents of berrien, cass, saint joseph, van buren and kalamazoo…

Education
12
Family Service of Bartholomew County Inc

To strengthen and enhance the wellbeing of families and individuals throughout the life cycle and to advocate for a community environment that nurtures family life and promotes social responsibility.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Barry Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Young Men's Christian Association of Barry County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BARRY COMMUNITY TRIAL COURTINITIATIVE INC: $114,000 · OtherBARRY COMMUNITY TRIAL COURTINITIATIVE INCFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF BARRY COUNTY: $103,000 · OtherFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF BARRY COUNTYYMCA OF BARRY COUNTY: $77,000 · OtherYMCA OF BARRY COUNTYBARRY CO TRIAL COURT INITIATIVE: $76,895 · OtherBARRY CO TRIAL COURT INITIATIVEYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BARRY COUNTY: $40,000 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BARRY COUNTYTHORNAPPLE ARTS COUNCIL OF BARRY COUNTY: $37,000 · OtherTHORNAPPLE ARTS COUNCIL OF BARRY COUNTYST ROSE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE ACADEMY: $30,000 · OtherNOAH'S ARK PRESCHOOL: $25,000 · Other+12 more: $129,000 · Other+12 moreCASA FOR KIDS INC: $91,000 · Civil RightsCASA FOR KI…BARRY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $67,000 · PhilanthropyCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $60,000 · HealthGREEN GABLES HAVEN: $41,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION DBA MEDIATION SERVICES: $13,814 · Crime & Legal
Other$663,895Civil Rights$91,000Philanthropy$67,000Health$60,000Human Services$41,000Crime & Legal$13,814

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF BARRY COUNTY: $103,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetCASA FOR KIDS INC: $91,000 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetBARRY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $67,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCOREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN: $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGREEN GABLES HAVEN: $41,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BARRY COUNTY: $40,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHORNAPPLE ARTS COUNCIL OF BARRY COUNTY: $37,000 over 5y, 3.5% of budgetCENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION DBA MEDIATION SERVICES: $13,814 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBARRY COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $8,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER OF BARRY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CASA FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BARRY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COREWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION WEST MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds GREEN GABLES HAVEN ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BARRY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THORNAPPLE ARTS COUNCIL OF BARRY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION DBA MEDIATION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds BARRY COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barry Community FoundationMI20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barry Community Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard B Messer FBO Pennock Hospital funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard B Messer FBO Pennock Hospital. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard B Messer FBO Pennock Hospital’s filings →

    More from the funding graph