Skip to content

· Private foundation

Richard & Mary Jacobson Private Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$317kReligion$57kHousing & Shelter$53kCrime & Legal$40kRecreation & Sports$25kPublic Benefit$25kHuman Services$20kScience & Tech$15k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$852k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY$25,000
OAK KNOLL SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD$10,000
CENTRAL MISSIONARY CLEARINGHOUSE$9,500
FRIENDS OF HARVARD FIELD HOCKEY$5,000
OHR TORAH STONE$5,000
MDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY$5,000
FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD$5,000
MAGNIFICAT HOME INC$5,000
THE PETEY GREENE PROGRAM$5,000
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$2,000
ASSUMPTION COLLEGE FOR SISTERS$1,000
SISTERS OF CHRISTIAN CHARITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FRIENDS OF HARVARD FIELD HOCKEY: $5k → 8%OHR TORAH STONE: $5k → 17%CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $30k → 14%ST ELIZABETH'S CHURCH: $10k → 5%OAK KNOLL SCHOOL OF HOLY CHILD: $20k → 10%THE PETEY GREENE PROGRAM: $5k → 11%MAGNIFICAT HOME INC: $7k → 14%ASSOICATION OF THE US ARMY: $5k → 7%MDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF HARVARD FIELD HOCKEY: $5k → 8%OHR TORAH STONE: $5k → 17%CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $25k → 14%HOPE THROUGH EDUCATION: $15k → 5%OAK KNOLL SCHOOL OF HOLY CHILD: $15k → 10%THE PETEY GREENE PROGRAM: $5k → 11%MAGNIFICAT HOME INC: $7k → 14%FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD: $5k → 7%MDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF HARVARD FIELD HOCKEY: $5k → 8%OHR TORAH STONE: $5k → 17%CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $25k → 14%HOPE THROUGH EDUCATION: $5k → 5%OAK KNOLL SCHOOL OF HOLY CHILD: $15k → 10%THE PETEY GREENE PROGRAM: $5k → 11%MAGNIFICAT HOME INC: $7k → 14%FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD: $5k → 7%MDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $5k → 11%FRIENDS OF HARVARD FIELD HOCKEY: $5k → 8%OHR TORAH STONE: $5k → 17%CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $25k → 14%HOPE THROUGH EDUCATION: $5k → 5%OAK KNOLL SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD: $10k → 10%THE PETEY GREENE PROGRAM: $5k → 11%MAGNIFICAT HOME INC: $7k → 14%FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD: $5k → 7%CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $25k → 14%HOPE THROUGH EDUCATION: $5k → 5%OAK KNOLL SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD: $10k → 10%THE PETEY GREENE PROGRAM: $5k → 11%MAGNIFICAT HOME INC: $5k → 14%FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD: $5k → 7%CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $25k → 14%MAGNIFICAT HOME INC: $5k → 14%CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $20k → 14%MAGNIFICAT HOME INC: $5k → 14%CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $20k → 14%MAGNIFICAT HOME INC: $5k → 14%CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $20k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
NJ
VA
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$536k · 15 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
3

Total granted

$536k
$16k

Still filing today

53%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalCivil RightsPublic BenefitReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +64%
  • The Petey Greene Program Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +70%
  • CM
    Central Missionary Clearinghouse Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • SE
    ST ELIZABETH'S CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • AO
    ASSOICATION OF THE US ARMY
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CO
    COMMUNITY OF THE FRANCISCAN FRIARS
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivat Maharat Inc

Yeshivat maharat is the first institution to train and ordain orthodox women as clergy, preparing students for the rabbinate through an innovative curriculum focused on depth of scholarship in jewish law, pastoral skills, and leadership…

Education
2
Olivet University

Providing guality Christian education to the network generation

Education
3
Center of Theological Inquiry

The Center of Theological Inquiry is an independent research institution with an international visiting scholar program which convenes researchers in an ideal setting for interdisciplinary inquiries where theology casts light on global…

Religion
4
Union Institute & University

Union Institute & University educates highly motivated adults who seek academic programs to engage, enlighten, and empower them to pursue professional goals and a lifetime of learning and service. Offering accredited bachelors, masters,…

—
5
Alpha and Omega Ministries Inc

Alpha and Omega Ministries seeks to provide a faithful and accurate response to the many challenges presented to the Christian Church in the modern world. Based firmly upon an unflinching commitment to the Bible as the Word of God and to…

Religion
6
Womens Institute of Torah Seminary for Girls

Post High School Education

Education
7
House of Hope International

See schedule oour mission is the integration of women and children into society, transformed through the power of healing and complete discipleship and vocational training within a safe, loving, and serving community. our vision is to see…

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
9
The Ruth Institute

The ruth institute promotes marriage as a fundamental, lifelong union between a man and a woman. the institute advocates collaboration and cooperation between women and men. basing the message on high quality scientific research, the…

Health
10
Houston Graduate School of Theology

Equip women and men to be ministers and messengers of God's mission of reconciliation through academic excellence, personal transformation, and leadership development.

—
11
Chevrah Lomdei Mishnah Inc

Promoting study of Mishnah and other Jewish texts

Religion
12
Berean Bible Institute Inc

Bible and ministry education programs

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Hope Academy; the most unlike its peers is Assumption College for Sisters. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $215,000 · EducationCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMYOAK KNOLL SCHOOL OF HOLY CHILD: $50,000 · OtherOAK KNOLL SCHOOL OF HOLY CHILDIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF HARVARD FIELD HOCKEY: $25,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF HARVARD FIELD HOCKEYCentral Missionary Clearinghouse Inc: $24,500 · OtherCentral Missionary Clearinghouse IncOAK KNOLL SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILD: $20,000 · OtherOAK KNOLL SCHOOL OF THE HOLY CHILDUNITED SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $20,000 · OtherUNITED SERVICES ORGANIZATIONMDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORY: $15,000 · OtherMDI BIOLOGICAL LABORATORYST ELIZABETH'S CHURCH: $10,000 · Other+3 more: $7,500 · OtherMAGNIFICAT HOME INC: $53,000 · Housing & ShelterMAGNIFICAT…The Petey Greene Program Inc: $29,000 · Crime & LegalTHE FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD INC: $20,000 · Public BenefitOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $20,000 · ReligionEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $11,000 · Civil RightsASSUMPTION COLLEGE FOR SISTERS: $1,500 · Youth Development
Education$215,000Other$202,000Housing & Shelter$53,000Crime & Legal$29,000Public Benefit$20,000Religion$20,000Civil Rights$11,000Youth Development$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $215,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetMAGNIFICAT HOME INC: $53,000 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetThe Petey Greene Program Inc: $29,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetCentral Missionary Clearinghouse Inc: $24,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD INC: $20,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $11,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetASSUMPTION COLLEGE FOR SISTERS: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds MAGNIFICAT HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds The Petey Greene Program Inc ↗
  • Who funds Central Missionary Clearinghouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION OF THE OLD GUARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds ASSUMPTION COLLEGE FOR SISTERS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Richard & Mary Jacobson Private Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Richard & Mary Jacobson Private Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • The Petey Greene Program Inc: 29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard & Mary Jacobson Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph