Skip to content

California · Private foundation

Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$64k
Granted FY2021
13
Grants FY2021
13
Organizations funded FY2021
8%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $64k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
7
’18
9
’19
4
’20
5
’21
1
’22
0
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$10,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 19
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
3
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 8% of the organizations Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
HealthArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202113$64k8%
FY202013$78k15%
FY201918$78k17%
FY201816$73k19%
FY201719$72kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Philanthropy$1.5MHealth$295kScience & Tech$55kReligion$40kEducation$37kEnvironment$20kArts & Culture$8kCommunity Improvement$6kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Scripps Health$132,00060%
Pepperdine University$36,00050%
Living Desert The$19,75050%
La Jolla Institute for Immunology$18,20040%
Chopra Foundation$18,00011%
The Scripps Research Institute$14,00010%
American Family Association Inc$8,00050%
San Diego Regional Economic Development Foundation$6,00030%
La Jolla Music Society$5,00010%
American Lung Association$5,00010%
Troopathon$1,50010%

Plus 17 recipients with no EIN on record ($208k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetScripps Health: $132,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPepperdine University: $36,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLiving Desert The: $19,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLa Jolla Institute for Immunology: $18,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetChopra Foundation: $18,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetThe Scripps Research Institute: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Family Association Inc: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSan Diego Regional Economic Development Foundation: $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLa Jolla Music Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Lung Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTroopathon: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation with peer funders

About Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation

How much does Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation give?
Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation reported 13 grants totaling $64,000 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 19 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Philanthropy (77%), Health (15%), Science & Tech (3%).
Who are Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Scripps Health ($132k), Pepperdine University ($36k), Living Desert The ($20k).
Does Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 8% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation based?
Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann Foundation is based in CA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Richard and Jocelyn Vortmann’s filings →

More from the funding graph