Loading…
· Public charity
RICHARD A ODOM FAMILY FOUNDATION
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc.
$3.4M
Granted FY2024
1
Grants
1
Communities
$3.4M
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Philanthropy$3.6MHealth$3.0MPublic Benefit$50kReligion$30kOther$1.3M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
researchtreatment
2021
ministriesresearchtreatment
2022
researchtreatment
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$3,398,133
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$3,398,133
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
48%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 3 repeat orgs$4.2M to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
5
Total granted
$3.8M
$800k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+74%
+2%
Still filing today
67%
80%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.4M went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
PhilanthropyHealthPublic BenefitReligionOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL3× · 2020–2022 · $3.0M · revenue +74%- KDKING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER2× · 2021–2023 · $500k · revenue -8%
- SJST JAMES THE LESS EPISCOPAL CHURCH2× · 2020–2021 · $300k
Funded once
- MSMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION NATIONAL HEADQUARTERSone grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue -44%
- ITIN TOUCH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue +134%
- ASASMBA STAR FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
St Marys Healthcare System for
To serve as the parent corporation of st. mary's hospital for children, inc. and such other healthcare and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's.
Health
2
Abim Foundation
See schedule o.as an operating charity, the abim foundation develops and implements projects in support of our mission to advance the core values of medical professionalism as a force to improve the quality of health care.
Health
3
The Foundation of St Mary's Healthcare
To actively seek and invest charitable support for st. mary's healthcare, so that they may improve the health and well-being of all the people in the communities they serve.
—
4
St Martin Hospital Inc
The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve, regarless of the patients' ability to pay.
Health
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of
Leader in medical regulation, serving as an innovative catalyst for effective policy & standards.
Health
6
University of Dayton
The university of dayton is a top-tier catholic research university with academic offerings from the undergraduate to the doctoral levels. we are a diverse community committed, in the marianist tradition, to educating the whole person and…
Education
7
St Marys Hospital for Children Inc
St. marys healthcare system for children is committed to improving the health and quality of life for children, young adults, and families with medical complexity and special healthcare needs.
Health
8
Michigan State Medical Society
Promote a health care environment that supports physicians in caring for and enhancing the health of michigan citizens through science, quality, and ethics in the practice of medicine.
—
9
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Clinic
Advancing health through research, education, clinical practice, and community partnerships; providing each person the best care in the right place, at the right time, every time.
Health
10
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc
To support the delivery of health care services to patients in the new york metropolitan area.
Health
11
Moral Compass Federation Inc
To serve its members through communications, fundraising, policy advocacy, and incubation.
Public Benefit
12
Arizona Foundation for Women
To advance the status of arizona's women through research, advocacy and philanthropy to ensure their safety, health and economic independence. this includes performing the functions of, or carrying out the purposes of the arizona community…
Human Services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is March of Dimes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mount Vernon Missionary Baptist. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Philanthropy$3,598,133Health$3,020,000Other$1,300,000Public Benefit$50,000Religion$30,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOUNDATION NATIONAL HEADQUARTERS ↗
- Who funds KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds IN TOUCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASMBA STAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNT VERNON MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES ↗
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation RICHARD A ODOM FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~8 months of operating runway; revenue held over 8 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 620729602 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on KING'S DAUGHTERS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 20% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Richard a Odom Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Richard a Odom Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines