· Public charity
Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence
The purpose of the ricadv is to eliminate domestic violence in rhode island our mission is to support and enhance the work of our member agencies and to provide leadership on the issue of domestic violence.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $312k
- $250k+5 grants · $3.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BLACKSTONE VALLEY ADVOCACY CENTER | $1,154,437 |
| WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF NEWPORT AND BRISTOL COUNTIES | $993,083 |
| ELIZABETH BUFFUM CHACE CENTER | $800,217 |
| DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER OF SOUTH COUNTY | $525,941 |
| CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND | $252,372 |
| PROGRESO LATINO | $98,502 |
| YOUTH IN ACTION | $94,344 |
| REFUGEE DREAM CENTER | $69,497 |
| ARISE | $50,000 |
| CONEXION LATINA NEWPORT | $21,651 |
| SOJOURNER HOUSE INC | $16,624 |
| CONNECTING FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES | $12,787 |
| CENTER FOR SOUTHEAST ASIANS | $10,936 |
| DAY ONE | $10,504 |
| KATIE BROWN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM | $9,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $14.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BVBLACKSTONE VALLEY ADVOCACY CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $8.4M · revenue +146% · 64% of their budget
- WRWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER OF NEWPORT AND BRISTOL COUNTIES9× · 2017–2025 · $7.6M · revenue +54% · 44% of their budget
ELIZABETH BUFFUM CHACE CENTER9× · 2017–2025 · $4.6M · revenue +117% · 59% of their budget
Funded once
- PHPROVIDENCE HOUSING AUTHORITYone grant, 2022 · $15k
ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND SOUTHEAST ASIANS FOR EDUCATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +246%
Riverzedge Arts Projectone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the ricadv is to eliminate domestic violence in rhode island our mission is to support and enhance the work of our member agencies and to provide leadership on the issue of domestic violence.
The mission of children's friend and service (the organization) is to be the innovative leader in improving the well-being and healthy development of rhode island's most vulnerable young children. they accomplish this by providing flexible…
To assist rhode islanders with differing abilities in their efforts to achieve full inclusion in society and to exercise their civil and human rights through the provision of legal advocacy.
New hope engages survivors, stakeholders and communities to build an anti-violence movement. using a trauma-informed practice, we work with those impacted by sexual and domestic violence, as well as those persons who use abuse in their…
The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…
The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.
Provide education, advocacy, and support to spanish speaking individuals affected by violence and injustice in virginia to ensure that they can access services to empower them to become happy, healthy, and self- sufficient.
Rhode island legal services provides high quality legal assistance and representation to low-income individuals and eligible client groups for the purpose of improving their economic condition and overall wellbeing by protecting and…
The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…
The parent support network of ri is a group of parents, family members, transition age youth, and adults with behavioral health lived experience who are committed to supporting and assisting peers and working with statewide and national…
To empower and support positive choices for all and to educate and take action in the community for the prevention of oppression and violence.
The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Adoption Rhode Island and the most unlike its peers is Katie Brown Educational Program Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLACKSTONE VALLEY ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER OF NEWPORT AND BRISTOL COUNTIES ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH BUFFUM CHACE CENTER ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER OF SOUTH COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PROGRESO LATINO ↗
- Who funds DAY ONE ↗
- Who funds YOUTH IN ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds Refugee Development Center ↗
- Who funds YWCA RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds ARISE FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR SOUTHEAST ASIANS ↗
- Who funds PROJECT SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds SHEILA C SKIP NOWELL LEADERSHIP ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CONEXION LATINA NEWPORT ↗
- Who funds KATIE BROWN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG VOICES ↗
- Who funds DORCAS INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds Meeting Street ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE OF RHODE ISLAND SOUTHEAST ASIANS FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Riverzedge Arts Project ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC ↗
- Who funds ADOPTION RHODE ISLAND ↗
- Who funds CONNECTING FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW BRIDGES FOR HAITIAN SUCCESS INC ↗
- Who funds BLACKSTONE VALLEY COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR PROVIDENCE PARKS ↗
- Who funds NONVIOLENCE INSTITUTE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rhode Island Community Foundation · United Way of Rhode Island Inc · The Champlin Foundation · Ralph R Papitto & Barbara a Papitto Private Family Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Harborone Foundation Rhode Island · June Rockwell Levy Foundation Incorporated · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · Bristol County Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Citizens Charitable Foundation · The Nordson Corporation Foundation · Paul F and Joyce Kilmartin Beneficent Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.