Skip to content

· Private foundation

Rg Laha Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$202kArts & Culture$62kPhilanthropy$48kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kHuman Services$5kEducation$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,118
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ARTS COMMISSION OF GRTR TOLEDO$5,118
NAMI OF GREATER TOLEDO$5,118
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,118
Individual grant recipient$5,118
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER$5,118
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$5,118
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS$5,118
HARBOR INC$5,118
CHILDREN'S RESOURCE CENTER$5,118
TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,118
VICTORY CENTER$5,118
Individual grant recipient$5,118
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$279k · 12 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$279k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+9%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    HARBOR INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $35k · revenue +7%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF GREATER TOLEDO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +37%
  • TV
    THE VICTORY CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +65%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • WC
    WOOD COUNTY CHILDRENS SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • BG
    BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
2
Columbus Community Clinical Oncology Program

Our mission is to deliver state-of-the-art cancer care to patients in their communities through clinical trials. this allows individuals to remain in their won neighborhoods, while receiving the latest and best in cancer screenings,…

—
3
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
4
Atrium Medical Center Foundation

To develop charitable gifts and resources dedicated to building healthier communities in southwest ohio.

Health
5
The Healthcare Connection Inc

To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.

—
6
Bowen Health Inc

To provide compassionate, patient-centered care for mind and body that improves the quality of life for our communities.

Health
7
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
8
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
9
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
11
The Center for Health Affairs

The mission of the organization is to implement programs and services to improve healthcare throughout northeast ohio.

Health
12
Rumford Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Toledo Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE VICTORY CENTER: $31,126 · OtherTHE VICTORY CENTERNATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS: $31,126 · OtherNATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTSAMERICAN RED CROSS: $30,540 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER: $15,146 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCERMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $11,448 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $9,955 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $9,955 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,824 · Other+3 more: $14,841 · Other+3 moreHARBOR INC: $35,407 · HealthHARBOR INCNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF GREATER TOLEDO: $31,126 · HealthNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF GRE…American Heart Association Inc: $31,126 · HealthAmerican Heart Association IncELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $21,171 · HealthELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATIONWOOD COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $20,771 · HealthWOOD COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES ASSOCIATIO…+1 more: $4,532 · HealthTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $31,126 · PhilanthropyTOLEDO COMMUNI…Bowling Green Community Foundation: $16,639 · PhilanthropyBowling Green …THE ARTS COMMISSION OF GREATER TOLEDO I: $26,008 · Arts & CultureAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,118 · Human Services
Other$159,961Health$144,133Philanthropy$47,765Arts & Culture$26,008Human Services$5,118

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHARBOR INC: $35,407 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF GREATER TOLEDO: $31,126 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetTOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $31,126 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VICTORY CENTER: $31,126 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $31,126 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARTS COMMISSION OF GREATER TOLEDO I: $26,008 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION: $21,171 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWOOD COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES ASSOCIATION: $20,771 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBowling Green Community Foundation: $16,639 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $5,118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $4,532 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF GREATER TOLEDO ↗
  • Who funds TOLEDO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VICTORY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTS COMMISSION OF GREATER TOLEDO I ↗
  • Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOOD COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Bowling Green Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foundation IncOH17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · United Way of Greater Toledo · Promedica Health System Inc · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rg Laha Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rg Laha Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rg Laha’s filings →

    More from the funding graph