Skip to content
Reyim Ahuvim Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Reyim Ahuvim Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$465k
Granted FY2025still arriving
89
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Religion$1.4MEducation$184kPhilanthropy$132kFood & Nutrition$107kInternational$89kHealth$63kHuman Services$47kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 89 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k69 grants · $127k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $289k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,550
Median grant
12
States reached
$675k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA$50,000
ANSHEI CHESED$35,200
ROCHEL IMEINU FOUNDATION$28,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA TORAS M$20,500
YESHIVA OHR YOSEF OF ROCKLAND COUNT$18,000
KHAL ZICHRON CHANINA GETZEL$18,000
MESIVTA EITZ CHAIM$17,200
BNOS LEAH PROSPECT YESHIVA HIGH SCH$17,000
CONGREGATION KOLLEL BNEI YESHIVOS$13,750
TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY$13,600
LEV SHALOM INC$12,200
OPERATION OPEN CURTAIN$12,000
KOLLEL ZICHRON SHNEUR$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,700
Individual grant recipient$10,469
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 56% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT: $7k → 6%THE LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT: $5k → 6%KEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $6k → 11%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $360 → 6%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YISA BRACHA: $3k → 11%YAD CHAYA INC: $500 → 6%A TIME: $500 → 20%KEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $500 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $1k → 11%MONSEY SHIDDUCH INITIATIVE INC: $10k → 14%MONSEY SHIDDUCH INITIATIVE INC: $10k → 14%THE LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT: $5k → 14%HILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $1k → 14%TIKVASEINU: $3k → 14%TIKVASEINU: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 43 repeat orgs$718k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
80

Total granted

$1.3M
$585k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+6%

Still filing today

40%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $133k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyInternationalReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    Rachel Imeinu Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $97k · revenue +73%
  • DW
    DRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $88k · revenue +33%
  • HF
    HEBRON FUND INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $34k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • OO
    OTHER ORGANIZATION UNDER 5000
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • RI
    RECHEL IMEING FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $41k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC
    one grant, 2023 · $36k · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
5
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
6
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
9
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
10
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
11
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
12
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shavei Hevron Institutions Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alevy Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 180 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
60/61
Grantees still filing
30/61
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MESIVTA EITZ CHAIM: $99,800 · OtherMESIVTA EITZ CHAIMTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND: $95,000 · OtherTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLANDANSHEI CHESED INC: $82,600 · OtherANSHEI CHESED INCOTHER ORGANIZATION UNDER 5000: $59,840 · OtherYESHIVA DARCHEI TORAH: $53,000 · OtherYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON MOSHE: $52,200 · OtherAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $50,000 · Other+129 more: $927,424 · Other+129 moreRachel Imeinu Foundation: $96,800 · PhilanthropyRachel Ime…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC: $36,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN F…HEBRON FUND INC: $33,600 · PhilanthropyHEBRON FUN…SHAARE DAAS INC: $8,000 · Philanthropy+5 more: $7,400 · PhilanthropyDRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC: $88,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NESIVOS HATORAH: $20,000 · EducationIsrael Experience Tide Inc: $10,500 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $9,700 · Education+7 more: $17,550 · EducationTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $106,960 · Food & NutritionCentral Fund of Israel: $21,800 · InternationalSHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $18,000 · InternationalONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $16,500 · InternationalBinyamin Fund Inc DBA The Heart of Israel: $11,000 · InternationalNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $10,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ELON MOREH: $3,000 · InternationalMONSEY SHIDDUCH INITIATIVE INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT INC: $17,200 · Human ServicesKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesTIKVASEINU INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Friends of Yisa Bracha Inc: $2,500 · Human ServicesDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $2,160 · Human Services+4 more: $3,000 · Human ServicesKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $10,800 · ReligionKESHER GLOBAL INC: $7,500 · ReligionYESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 · ReligionBais Havaad Linyonei Mishpat A NJ Nonprofit Corporation: $5,000 · ReligionKOLLEL OHR HATALMUD INC: $1,200 · Religion+1 more: $532 · Religion
Other$1,419,864Philanthropy$181,800Education$155,750Food & Nutrition$106,960International$80,300Human Services$54,860Religion$30,032

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $106,960 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetRachel Imeinu Foundation: $96,800 over 3y, 20% of budgetDRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC: $88,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC: $36,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $33,600 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLEV SHALOM INC: $21,900 over 3y, 6.2% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $21,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NESIVOS HATORAH: $20,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetMONSEY SHIDDUCH INITIATIVE INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT INC: $17,200 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NER YAAKOV INC: $17,200 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $16,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBinyamin Fund Inc DBA The Heart of Israel: $11,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $10,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetIsrael Experience Tide Inc: $10,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ZOHAR CHARITY AND EDUCATIONAL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA ORCHOS CHAIM INC: $9,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHAARE DAAS INC: $8,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetKESHER GLOBAL INC: $7,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetKEREN HATZEDAKA INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAS NER MOSHE ASSOCIATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNetzach Educational Network Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF JUDEA AND SAMARIA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTIKVASEINU INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF SOUTH FALLSBURG INC ELIMELECH TRESS: $3,600 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetKINYAN HAMESHECHTA INC: $3,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ELON MOREH: $3,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetAmerican Friends of Yisa Bracha Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $2,160 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLOH EMS INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEICHAL HATORAH: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHEMIRAS SEDORIM INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $1,720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL OHR HATALMUD INC: $1,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZICHRON TZVI ELIMELECH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRutgers Learning Network Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYAD YISROEL: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF LEMA'AN ACHAI: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT NOAM: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF OVERSEAS RESEARCH: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Rachel Imeinu Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DRESSED WITH DIGNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds AGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC ↗
  • Who funds HEBRON FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds LEV SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NESIVOS HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds MONSEY SHIDDUCH INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds SHAVEI HEVRON INSTITUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NER YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundJewish Communal FundJack Adjmi Family Fou…The Weiskopf Family F…The Jmg FoundationNational Society for …Cross River Community…Yr Foundation TrustJewish Community Foun…Associated Jewish Cha…Zichron Avroham Moshe…Murray & Sydell Rosen…
The Ojc FundNY58.4× affinity52 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Weiskopf Family Foundation · The Jmg Foundation · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools · Cross River Community Foundation · Yr Foundation Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Zichron Avroham Moshe Foundation · Murray & Sydell Rosenberg Foundationinc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reyim Ahuvim Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reyim Ahuvim Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 180%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • Yeshiva Orchos Chaim Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Heichal Hatorah: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
18get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 180 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reyim Ahuvim’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home