Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Rexarc Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$135k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Youth Development$69kHuman Services$68kFood & Nutrition$40kCommunity Improvement$25kArts & Culture$19kHealth$18kEducation$16kCrime & Legal$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $61k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROOKVILLE COMMUNITY NETWORK$15,000
SHOES 4 THE SHOELESS$15,000
BROOKVILLE COMMUNITY THEATRE$11,000
THE COMMON GOOD OF PREBLE COUNTY$10,000
OHIO BUSINESS WEEK FOUNDATION$10,000
WEST ALEXANDRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
TWIN VALLEY SEVENTH BAND BOOSTERS$7,500
HIT FOUNDATION$6,039
BROOKVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND$6,000
PREBLE COUNTY YOUTH FOUNDATION$6,000
PREBLE ARTS ASSOCIATION$4,000
PREBLE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$4,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHOES 4 THE SHOELESS: $15k → 9%SHOES 4 THE SHOELESS: $15k → 9%THE COMMON GOOD OF PREBLE COUNTY: $10k → 11%THE COMMON GOOD OF PREBLE COUNTY: $10k → 11%DAYBREAK: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$218k · 12 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$218k
$94k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-1%

Still filing today

33%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OB
    OHIO BUSINESS WEEK FOUNDATION
    3× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue -80% · 30% of their budget
  • S4
    SHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $30k · revenue +27%
  • BC
    BROOKVILLE COMMUNITY NETWORK
    2× · 2023–2024 · $25k

Funded once

  • PC
    PREBLE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue -49%
  • TJ
    THE JAMES CANCER RESEARCH
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • DI
    DAYBREAK INC
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue -1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Eaton-Preble County Chamber of Comm

To promote business in preble county ohio.

2
Preston County Chamber of Commerce

Improve business environment for members

Community Improvement
3
Versailles Community Scholarship Fund Inc

College scholarships for high school seniors

4
Friends of the Owen County Library Inc
5
Starke County Historical Society

Preserve history of starke county indiana

6
Poweshiek County Fair Foundation
Recreation & Sports
7
Blytheville High School Scholarship Foundation

To provide scholarships for blytheville area students

8
Goshen County Junior Livestock Sale

To promote the youth of Goshen County by providing opportunity to participate in the Goshen County Fair. The Junior Livestock Sale is an exclusive opportunity to the youth enrolled in the 4-H and FFA organizations.

Animals
9
Clarke County Youth Basketball

Clarke County Youth Basketball provides a basketball league for local youth. The league is run by volunteers and has teams for kids ages 6-14.

Recreation & Sports
10
Swift County Historical Society
11
Tyrone Township Historical Society

To preserve, advance and disseminate knowledge of the history of tyrone township

Education
12
Trimble County Apple Festival Inc
Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Preble County Historical Society Inc and the most unlike its peers is Daybreak Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BROOKVILLE COMMUNITY NETWORK — $25,000 · OtherBROOKVILLE COMMUNITY NETWORKTHE JAMES CANCER RESEARCH — $15,000 · OtherTHE JAMES CANCER RESEARCHHIT FOUNDATION — $13,539 · OtherHIT FOUNDATIONPREBLE COUNTY YOUTH FOUNDATION — $13,500 · OtherPREBLE COUNTY YOUTH FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST ALEXANDRIA POLICE DEPARTMENT — $13,000 · OtherWEST ALEXANDRIA POLICE DEPARTMENTST FRANCIS DESALE HIGH SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherST FRANCIS DESALE HIGH SCHOOL1ST OHIO CMSA — $7,550 · OtherTWIN VALLEY SEVENTH BAND BOOSTERS — $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $6,500 · Other+7 more — $21,800 · Other+7 moreSHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesSHOES 4 THE SHOELESS …THE COMMON GOOD OF PREBLE COUNTY — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE COMMON GOOD OF PR…DAYBREAK INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesDAYBREAK INCOHIO BUSINESS WEEK FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentOHIO BUSINESS WE…PREBLE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY — $40,000 · Food & NutritionPREBLE COUNTY…BROOKVILLE COMMUNITY THEATRE — $11,000 · Arts & CulturePREBLE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $4,000 · Arts & CultureBROOKVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $6,000 · Philanthropy
Other$172,389Human Services$65,000Youth Development$50,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Arts & Culture$15,000Philanthropy$6,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOHIO BUSINESS WEEK FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 3y, 30% of budgetPREBLE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY — $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC — $30,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHE COMMON GOOD OF PREBLE COUNTY — $20,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetDAYBREAK INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPREBLE COUNTY YOUTH FOUNDATION — $13,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBROOKVILLE COMMUNITY THEATRE — $11,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetBROOKVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetPREBLE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN LEGION POST 322 — $3,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OHIO BUSINESS WEEK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PREBLE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds SHOES 4 THE SHOELESS INC
  • Who funds THE COMMON GOOD OF PREBLE COUNTY
  • Who funds DAYBREAK INC
  • Who funds PREBLE COUNTY YOUTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BROOKVILLE COMMUNITY THEATRE
  • Who funds BROOKVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PREBLE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN LEGION POST 322

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dayton FoundationOH13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dayton Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Rexarc Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph