Skip to content
Rev Narayan S Bhore Memorial Assn Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Rev Narayan S Bhore Memorial Assn Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$122k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$235kPhilanthropy$159kInternational$128kHousing & Shelter$127kHuman Services$95kEducation$33kCrime & Legal$10kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $117k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
School of Unusual Life Learning$22,000
Kathy's House$20,000
The Hospitality Center$20,000
Marvelle Foundation Inc$15,000
Women's Fund of Greater Milwaukee$15,000
HOPES Center of Racine Inc$15,000
Brain Research Foundation$10,000
Catholic Charities$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $127k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 35% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Women Children Horizons: $20k → 10%Women's Fund of Greater Milwaukee: $15k → 17%ECLA Outreach Center: $15k → 10%Women's Fund of Greater Milwaukee: $10k → 17%Women's Fund of Greater Milwaukee: $10k → 17%Women's Fund of Greater Milwaukee: $10k → 17%Marvelle Foundation Inc: $15k → 10%Marvelle Foundation Inc: $15k → 10%Marvelle Foundation Inc: $12k → 10%Catholic Charities: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$733k · 14 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$733k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
-21%

Still filing today

57%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOPES CENTER OF RACINE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $76k · revenue +77%
  • CM
    CATHERINE MARIAN HOUSING INC DBA BETHANY APARTMENTS
    3× · 2017–2022 · $51k · revenue +33%
  • WF
    WOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $45k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • WA
    WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S HORIZONS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -21%
  • EO
    ELCA OUTREACH CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +8%
  • RN
    RACINE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -60%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friendship House of Milwaukee
—
2
Neighborhood Housing Services of Southeast Wisconsin Inc

The purpose of neighborhood housing services of southeast wisconsin, inc. is to renew pride, restore confidence,promote reinvestment, and revitalize the nhs neighborhoods through the efforts of local residents acting in concert with…

Housing & Shelter
3
Cathedral Center Inc

Cathedral center's mission is to provide a safe environment for women and families, while working to end homelessness one life at a time. the cathedral center serves unaccompanied women and families with children who are homeless or…

Religion
4
Outreach Community Health Centers Inc

To ensure that men, women, and children in the greater milwaukee area receive the quality health care, behavioral health, housing, and supportive services they need in order to live at the highest possible level of self-sufficiency.

Health
5
Nami Greater Milwaukee Inc

Improving the lives of those with mental illness.

—
6
Wisconsin Rapids Family Center Inc

Our mission is to empower those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and address the root causes of abuse in the community through education and advocacy.

—
7
Racine County Opportunity Center

Our focus is on making shortterm investments which will significantly improve the longterm wellbeing of our clients. we will measure our performance against these standards by continuously communicating with our clients, and will take…

Human Services
8
The Women's Center Inc

To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.

Human Services
9
The Milwaukee Women's Center Inc

The mission of the milwaukee women's center, inc. is to provide innovative, culturally competent holistic care that will empower men, women, and children to live safe, independent, and healthy lives.

Human Services
10
Racine Revitalization Partnership Inc

Our mission is to build a better Racine through the social, physical, and economic revitalization of our neighborhoods.

Community Improvement
11
Wisconsin Lutheran Home Ministries Inc

To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.

—
12
Milwaukee Catholic Home Inc

Rooted in our catholic tradition and commitment to christian love and community, milwaukee catholic home, inc. (mch) provides continuing care services for older adults.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hopes Center of Racine Inc; the most unlike its peers is School of Unusual Life Learning. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rotary Foundation of Kenosha West I: $154,500 · OtherRotary Foundation of Kenosha West IHOPES CENTER OF RACINE INC: $76,000 · OtherHOPES CENTER OF RACINE INCCATHERINE MARIAN HOUSING INC DBA BETHANY APARTMENTS: $51,000 · OtherCATHERINE MARIAN HOUSING INC DBA BETHANY APARTMENTSIndia Development Services: $45,000 · OtherIndia Development ServicesThe Hospitality Center: $40,000 · OtherThe Hospitality CenterIndividual grant recipient: $23,000 · OtherWomen's Resource Center: $15,000 · Other+4 more: $27,000 · Other+4 moreKathy's House Inc: $165,000 · HealthKathy's House IncBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $40,000 · HealthBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATIONRacine Friendship Clubhouse: $15,000 · HealthRacine Friendship ClubhouseWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S FUND OF G…MARVELLE FOUNDATION: $42,000 · Human ServicesMARVELLE FOUNDATI…WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S HORIZONS INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN AND CHILDRE…ELCA OUTREACH CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesELCA OUTREACH CEN…CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $5,000 · Human ServicesSCHOOL OF UNUSUAL LIFE LEARNING: $22,000 · EducationRACINE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH INC: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$431,500Health$220,000Human Services$127,000Education$22,000Crime & Legal$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKathy's House Inc: $165,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetHOPES CENTER OF RACINE INC: $76,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetCATHERINE MARIAN HOUSING INC DBA BETHANY APARTMENTS: $51,000 over 3y, 8.7% of budgetWOMEN'S FUND OF GREATER MILWAUKEE INC: $45,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetMARVELLE FOUNDATION: $42,000 over 3y, 97% of budgetBRAIN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSCHOOL OF UNUSUAL LIFE LEARNING: $22,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetWOMEN AND CHILDREN'S HORIZONS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRacine Friendship Clubhouse: $15,000 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetELCA OUTREACH CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetRACINE NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS OF RACINE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC DIOCESE OF MADISON: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Green Bay Packers Fou…Racine Community Foun…United Way of Racine …Herbert H Kohl Charit…Ge Aerospace Foundati…The Blackbaud Giving …American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Green Bay Packers FoundationWI17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Green Bay Packers Foundation · Racine Community Foundation Inc · United Way of Racine County Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rev Narayan S Bhore Memorial Assn Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rev Narayan S Bhore Memorial Assn Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rev Narayan S Bhore Memorial Assn Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Rev Narayan S Bhore Memorial Assn Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rev Narayan S Bhore Memorial Assn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home