Skip to content

· Private foundation

Reuben and Lizzie Grossman Foundation Inc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2026still arriving
32
Grants FY2026still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$337kPhilanthropy$121kReligion$96kHealth$90kHuman Services$38kPublic Benefit$32kInternational$20kCommunity Improvement$18kOther$0
02FY2026 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY$5,020
LOWN CARDIOVASCULAR GROUP$4,500
TEMPLE AHAVAT ACHIM$4,000
WOODWARD SCHOOL FOR GIRLS$3,600
TEMPLE EMANUEL$3,520
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES$2,000
HULL HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
TOWN OF ABINGTON$1,500
MILTON HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
NORTH QUINCY HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
QUINCY HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
NORWELL HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
ARCHBISHOP WILLIAMS HIGH SCHOOL$1,500
TOWN OF BRAINTREE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–26, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%JCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%JCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%JCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%JCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $750 → 8%JCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $750 → 8%JCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $750 → 8%JCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $606 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of Reuben and Lizzie Grossman Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 0%.

Reuben and Lizzie Grossman Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$744k · 51 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 29 still active in FY2026, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
7

Total granted

$744k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

29%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHealthInternationalPhilanthropyArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $51k · revenue +16%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $31k · revenue +32%
  • NY
    NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC
    10× · 2017–2026 · $18k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • NC
    NEIGHBORHOOD CLUB OF QUINCY
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • MH
    MILTON HIGH SCHOOL SCHOLARSHIP FUD
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • LP
    LEO PALS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
3
Hillel Foundation of Cambridge Inc
Religion
4
Hebrew Rehabilitation Center

To operate its harvard medical schools affiliated chronic care hospital that provides seniors with compassionate long-term care, post-acute care, outpatient services and adult day health care.

Health
5
Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—
6
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
7
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
8
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
9
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
10
The Israel Institute Inc

The israel institute, inc. (the institute) enhances knowledge about modern israel by ensuring that more students have access to courses about israel during their time on campus.

International
11
Atlanta Jewish Academy Inc

Atlanta jewish academy is a college preparatory, co-educational, preschool-12th grade, independent jewish day school, guided by modern orthodox values and principles. we embody the ideals of community, tradition, individual development and…

Education
12
Bais Yaakov of Boston Inc

Bais yaakov of boston, the only all girls jewish high school in boston, is a college preparatory school that provides a comprehensive and challenging judaic and secular studies program. it offers orthodox jewish young women an environment…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hebrew Seniorlife Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $78,937 · OtherNEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMYTEMPLE AHAVAT ACHIM: $45,450 · OtherTEMPLE AHAVAT ACHIMTEMPLE EMANUEL: $39,071 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUELJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $30,700 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC+47 more: $359,267 · Other+47 moreCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $86,935 · PhilanthropyCombined Jewish …Hebrew Senior Life Inc: $34,800 · PhilanthropyHebrew Senior Li…Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $51,400 · HealthDana-Farber …LOWN CARDIOVASCULAR GROUP INC: $43,400 · HealthLOWN CARDIOV…TRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC: $15,000 · EducationHEBREW COLLEGE: $10,500 · EducationThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $6,854 · EducationNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $17,628 · Arts & CultureThe Shalem Foundation: $10,500 · Crime & LegalJCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $8,256 · Human Services
Other$553,425Philanthropy$121,735Health$94,800Education$32,354Arts & Culture$17,628Crime & Legal$10,500Human Services$8,256

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc: $86,935 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY: $78,937 over 10y, 1.5% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $51,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLOWN CARDIOVASCULAR GROUP INC: $43,400 over 10y, 0.2% of budgetHebrew Senior Life Inc: $34,800 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC: $30,700 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC: $17,628 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WOODWARD SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC: $15,600 over 10y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC: $15,000 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetROFEH INC: $14,950 over 10y, 0.7% of budgetHEBREW COLLEGE: $10,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe Shalem Foundation: $10,500 over 10y, 0.0% of budgetJCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $8,256 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College: $6,854 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $4,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $1,700 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND HEBREW ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOWN CARDIOVASCULAR GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds Hebrew Senior Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL YIDDISH BOOK CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOODWARD SCHOOL FOR GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THAYER ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROFEH INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Shalem Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JCAM CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA24.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Nissie and Ethel Grossman Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Reuben and Lizzie Grossman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Reuben and Lizzie Grossman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • New England Hebrew Academy: 10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • National Yiddish Book Center Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Woodward School for Girls Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Hebrew Senior Life Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Reuben and Lizzie Grossman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Reuben and Lizzie Grossman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Reuben and Lizzie Grossman’s filings →

More from the funding graph