· Public charity
Restore Hope Inc
To advance community-based solutions that reduce the effects of incarceration of adults and the impact of foster care on children.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k6 grants · $196k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OUACHITA REGIONAL (OBHAW) | $209,226 |
| JOURNEY CHURCH | $199,106 |
| EVERY ARKANSAN | $186,042 |
| PROJECT COMMUITY | $129,738 |
| CROWLEY'S RIDGE DEV COUNCIL | $111,307 |
| UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS | $100,776 |
| COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION | $100,483 |
| GROUND FLOOR COLLECTIVE | $91,129 |
| GREENE COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH & SUBST | $81,302 |
| WESTERN ARKANSAS COUNCELING & GUIDA | $73,621 |
| HANNAH PREGNANCY RES-SO AR | $62,020 |
| SOUTHEAST ARKANSAS COLLEGE | $56,260 |
| ARCARE | $55,668 |
| FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH | $50,194 |
| SPARROW'S PROMISE | $45,621 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $258k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $519k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CRCOMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC3× · 2022–2024 · $183k · revenue +2%
- AARCARE2× · 2023–2024 · $138k · revenue +32%
- SASOUTH ARKANSAS CARING PREGNANCY CENTER2× · 2023–2024 · $95k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- LCLITERACY COUNCIL OF BOWIE & MILLER COUNTIES INCone grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Arkansas employment career centers' mission is to assist individuals with career opportunities through education and training. the primary target groups are individuals returning home from incarceration, veterans, homeless, and young…
Ministry for child welfare and families in crisis.
Producing journalism that matters to Arkansans.
To promote the usage of peaceful and cooperative conflict resolution strategies in order to make mediation and other dispute resolution methods accessible to all arkansans regardless of ability to pay
Provide Emergency services, services include food, clothing, utility payment assistance, rental assistance, school supplies, infant care and medical assistance for 10442 individuals
To meet the needs of families in northwest arkansas for individualized parenting education and family support.
Education & habilitation services
Habilitation and residential services for adults with developmental disabilities
To create an environment where staff is conscientious to the behavioral health needs of the area in a manner which is client oriented, accessible, affordable, and quality driven.
Personal response & support services for aprox 1200 individuals ages 19 to 102 in five counties
To provide assistance to those in need living in the community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Western Arkansas Counseling and Guidance Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Together We Foster. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds OUACHITA REGIONAL COUNSELING & MENTAL HEALTH CTR INC ↗
- Who funds EVERY ARKANSAN INC ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS NETWORK LEARNING INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds ARCARE ↗
- Who funds Western Arkansas Counseling and Guidance Center Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH ARKANSAS CARING PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds GROUND FLOOR COLLECTIVE ↗
- Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF BOWIE & MILLER COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds CARTERS CREW ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE FOSTER ↗
- Who funds HARBOR HOUSE INC OF FORT SMITH ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS NORTHEASTERN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Delta Dental of Arkansas Foundation Inc · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Restore Hope Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Restore Hope Inc?
Find your warmest path to Restore Hope Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.