Skip to content
Restoration of America at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Restoration of America

To promote the common good and general welfare of the people of the united states by advocating in favor of policy changes with a goal of restoring national security and individual freedom in america.

$55M
Granted FY2024still arriving
29
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$14M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$56MCivil Rights$39MReligion$4.1MArts & Culture$3.7MEnvironment$1.0MEmployment$800kEducation$500kPublic Safety & Disaster$250kOther$0
02FY2024 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+16 grants · $54M
$250,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN MAJORITY ACTION INC$14,285,000
OVER THE HORIZON$10,704,250
SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST$5,333,335
AMERICAN CULTURE PROJECT$3,500,000
LIBERTY INITIATIVE FUND$3,500,000
LEAGUE OF AMERICAN WORKERS$3,343,556
FIDELIS$3,224,000
TEA PARTY PATRIOTS ACTION INC$3,166,668
MOM'S FOR LIBERTY$2,799,556
RESTORATION PAC$1,000,000
NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE$800,000
FIGHT VOTER FRAUD INC$690,000
CENTER FOR ELECTION CONFIDENCE (LAWYERS DEMOCRACY FUND)$625,000
AMERICAN PRINCIPLES PROJECT$333,333
BLADEN DISASTER RECOVERY TEAM$250,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HUNTER NATION: $100k → 5%NC VALUES COALITION: $61k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
IA
IN
OH
CT
MO
VA
AZ
KS
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90M · 15 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +60% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$90M
$5.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
0%

Still filing today

93%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsPublic BenefitEducationHuman ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    AMERICAN MAJORITY ACTION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $18M · revenue ×29 · 99% of their budget
  • SB
    Susan B Anthony List Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $16M · revenue +60%
  • OT
    Over the Horizon Action
    2× · 2023–2024 · $14M · revenue +433% · 93% of their budget

Funded once

  • AP
    AMERICA'S PAC
    one grant, 2021 · $1.3M
  • AP
    AMERICAN PRINCIPLES PROJECT PAC
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M
  • FC
    FAIR COURTS AMERICA
    one grant, 2023 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
People's Independent Commission

Supports Measure to Remove Lawmakers Power to Set Their Own Pay

—
2
Liberty Group Inc

Engaging in communications and other related activities to make the general public in various states aware of the public policy positions related to the democratic process of certain public officials so that members of the general public…

—
3
Act for America

Advocacy concerning democratic values, national security and defense; lobbying of government officials in favor of policies that further the defense of the u.s. and its constitution; development of coalitions with other organizations to…

Civil Rights
4
Right Vote Inc
Civil Rights
5
American Policy Coalition

With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.

Public Benefit
6
Defend Democracy Now

Conduct research and expose abuse of authority and power by government authorities and the deleterious effect such actions have on american democracy.

—
7
Americans for Public Trust

The Organization's mission is to restore trust in government by holding officials and groups accountable for corrupt and unethical behavior through investigation, legal action, and reporting.

Arts & Culture
8
Americans for Limited Government Inc

Advocate for various issues relating to limited government.

Civil Rights
9
Americans Against Government Censorship

Americans against government censorship's mission is to advocate against federal policies that threaten the ability of nonprofits to serve their communities and engage in constitutionally protected activity.

—
10
America Engaged

America Engaged is a public policy organization, dedicated to promoting the Constitution of the United States and its core structural features.

—
11
Election Watch Inc

Research analyze publish information to public on elections election systems laws and campaign financing.

Civil Rights
12
Secure Election Project Inc

To preserve and protect the sanctity of our vote by promoting commonsense, nonpartisan election security reforms that prevent hacking and fraud without restricting eligible citizens from accessing the polls.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoration of America Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Arizona Right to Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

20
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/32
Grantees still filing
13/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Over the Horizon Action: $14,313,375 · OtherOver the Horizon ActionLIBERTY INITIATIVE FUND: $8,302,835 · OtherLIBERTY INITIATIVE FUNDLEAGUE OF AMERICAN WORKERS: $3,793,556 · OtherLEAGUE OF AMERICAN WORKERSAMERICA'S PAC: $1,295,000 · Other+19 more: $7,079,576 · Other+19 moreAMERICAN MAJORITY ACTION: $18,395,627 · Public BenefitAMERICAN MAJORITY ACTIONAMERICAN CULTURE PROJECT: $3,500,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN CULTURE PROJECTAMERICAN MAJORITY INC: $1,443,262 · Public BenefitAMERICAN MAJORITY INC+1 more: $200,000 · Public BenefitSusan B Anthony List Inc: $16,380,906 · EducationSusan B Anthony List …Moms for Liberty: $2,799,556 · EducationMoms for Liberty+1 more: $500,000 · EducationTEA PARTY PATRIOTS ACTION INC: $8,921,666 · Civil RightsTEA PARTY PATRIOTS A…American Principles Project: $5,285,985 · Civil RightsAmerican Principles …FIGHT VOTER FRAUD INC: $3,800,002 · Civil RightsFIGHT VOTER FRAUD IN…+7 more: $724,675 · Civil RightsFIDELIS: $4,123,997 · ReligionCENTER FOR ELECTION CONFIDENCE INC: $4,062,000 · Crime & LegalBLADEN DISASTER RECOVERY TEAM INC: $250,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$34,784,342Public Benefit$23,538,889Education$19,680,462Civil Rights$18,732,328Religion$4,123,997Crime & Legal$4,062,000Public Safety & Disaster$250,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN MAJORITY ACTION: $18,395,627 over 4y, 99% of budgetSusan B Anthony List Inc: $16,380,906 over 4y, 21% of budgetOver the Horizon Action: $14,313,375 over 2y, 93% of budgetTEA PARTY PATRIOTS ACTION INC: $8,921,666 over 4y, 52% of budgetLIBERTY INITIATIVE FUND: $8,302,835 over 4y, 97% of budgetAmerican Principles Project: $5,285,985 over 5y, 62% of budgetFIDELIS: $4,123,997 over 3y, 14% of budgetCENTER FOR ELECTION CONFIDENCE INC: $4,062,000 over 5y, 100% of budgetFIGHT VOTER FRAUD INC: $3,800,002 over 4y, 46% of budgetLEAGUE OF AMERICAN WORKERS: $3,793,556 over 2y, 100% of budgetAMERICAN CULTURE PROJECT: $3,500,000 over 1y, 87% of budgetMoms for Liberty: $2,799,556 over 1y, 48% of budgetAMERICAN MAJORITY INC: $1,443,262 over 3y, 21% of budgetTHE NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE: $800,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetPATRIOTIC VETERANS INC: $554,500 over 2y, 46% of budgetEDUCATION ACTION GROUP FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetMountaineer Leadership Fund: $250,000 over 1y, 72% of budgetBLADEN DISASTER RECOVERY TEAM INC: $250,000 over 1y, 97% of budgetAMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNION ACTION FUND INC: $233,331 over 1y, 88% of budgetMACIVER IMPACT INC: $200,000 over 1y, 71% of budgetAMERICAN IMPACT: $200,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetWisconsin Center For Election Justice: $150,000 over 1y, 59% of budget1848 PROJECT INC: $135,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetFIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW & POLICY: $108,333 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetHUNTER NATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA VALUES COALITION: $61,200 over 1y, 12% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE COALITION: $50,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetVIRGINIANS FOR SAFE COMMUNITIES: $50,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetINTEGRITY MINNESOTA: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetRestoration of America Foundation Inc: $18,011 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $11,548 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Concord FundFidelity Investments …
The Concord FundVA15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Concord Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Restoration of America funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Restoration of America. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Restoration of America?

    Find your warmest path to Restoration of America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Restoration of America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home