· Public charity
Restoration of America
To promote the common good and general welfare of the people of the united states by advocating in favor of policy changes with a goal of restoring national security and individual freedom in america.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $24k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.4M
- $250k+16 grants · $54M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN MAJORITY ACTION INC | $14,285,000 |
| OVER THE HORIZON | $10,704,250 |
| SUSAN B ANTHONY LIST | $5,333,335 |
| LIBERTY INITIATIVE FUND | $3,500,000 |
| AMERICAN CULTURE PROJECT | $3,500,000 |
| LEAGUE OF AMERICAN WORKERS | $3,343,556 |
| FIDELIS | $3,224,000 |
| TEA PARTY PATRIOTS ACTION INC | $3,166,668 |
| MOM'S FOR LIBERTY | $2,799,556 |
| RESTORATION PAC | $1,000,000 |
| NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE | $800,000 |
| FIGHT VOTER FRAUD INC | $690,000 |
| CENTER FOR ELECTION CONFIDENCE (LAWYERS DEMOCRACY FUND) | $625,000 |
| AMERICAN PRINCIPLES PROJECT | $333,333 |
| MOUNTAINEER LEADERSHIP FUND | $250,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $161k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AMAMERICAN MAJORITY ACTION4× · 2021–2024 · $18M · revenue ×29 · 99% of their budget
- SBSusan B Anthony List Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $16M · revenue +60%
- OTOver the Horizon Action2× · 2023–2024 · $14M · revenue +433% · 93% of their budget
Funded once
- APAMERICA'S PACone grant, 2021 · $1.3M
- APAMERICAN PRINCIPLES PROJECT PACone grant, 2020 · $1.1M
- FCFAIR COURTS AMERICAone grant, 2023 · $1.0M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Supports Measure to Remove Lawmakers Power to Set Their Own Pay
Engaging in communications and other related activities to make the general public in various states aware of the public policy positions related to the democratic process of certain public officials so that members of the general public…
Advocacy concerning democratic values, national security and defense; lobbying of government officials in favor of policies that further the defense of the u.s. and its constitution; development of coalitions with other organizations to…
With a commitment to free market principles, APC focuses on educating the public about conservative fiscal policies that foster job growth, a stronger economy, and increased opportunity for all Americans.
Conduct research and expose abuse of authority and power by government authorities and the deleterious effect such actions have on american democracy.
The Organization's mission is to restore trust in government by holding officials and groups accountable for corrupt and unethical behavior through investigation, legal action, and reporting.
Advocate for various issues relating to limited government.
Americans against government censorship's mission is to advocate against federal policies that threaten the ability of nonprofits to serve their communities and engage in constitutionally protected activity.
America Engaged is a public policy organization, dedicated to promoting the Constitution of the United States and its core structural features.
Research analyze publish information to public on elections election systems laws and campaign financing.
To preserve and protect the sanctity of our vote by promoting commonsense, nonpartisan election security reforms that prevent hacking and fraud without restricting eligible citizens from accessing the polls.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoration of America Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Arizona Right to Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 7 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 30% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN MAJORITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds Susan B Anthony List Inc ↗
- Who funds Over the Horizon Action ↗
- Who funds TEA PARTY PATRIOTS ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY INITIATIVE FUND ↗
- Who funds American Principles Project ↗
- Who funds FIDELIS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ELECTION CONFIDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds FIGHT VOTER FRAUD INC ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE OF AMERICAN WORKERS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CULTURE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Moms for Liberty ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN MAJORITY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK COMMITTEE ↗
- Who funds PATRIOTIC VETERANS INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION ACTION GROUP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLADEN DISASTER RECOVERY TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds Mountaineer Leadership Fund ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS UNION ACTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN IMPACT ↗
- Who funds MACIVER IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds Wisconsin Center For Election Justice ↗
- Who funds 1848 PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA RIGHT TO LIFE ↗
- Who funds FIDELIS CENTER FOR LAW & POLICY ↗
- Who funds HUNTER NATION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA VALUES COALITION ↗
- Who funds INTEGRITY MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds VIRGINIANS FOR SAFE COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE COALITION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Concord Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Restoration of America funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Restoration of America?
Find your warmest path to Restoration of America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.