Skip to content
Residents' Association of Kendal at Ithaca Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Residents' Association of Kendal at Ithaca Inc

To promote the social, cultural, emotional, physical, spiritual and recreational well being of the entire kendal at ithaca community.

$29k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Employment$1.3MHealth$47kFood & Nutrition$38kInternational$34kHuman Services$29kEducation$15kYouth Development$15k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$28,775
Median grant
1
States reached
$238k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENDAL AT ITHACA INC$28,775
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KENDAL AT ITHACA INC: $196k → 16%KENDAL AT ITHACA INC: $191k → 16%KENDAL AT ITHACA INC: $184k → 16%KENDAL AT ITHACA INC: $181k → 16%KENDAL AT ITHACA INC: $165k → 16%KENDAL AT ITHACA INC: $163k → 16%KENDAL AT ITHACA INC: $150k → 16%KENDAL AT ITHACA INC: $29k → 16%ITHACA WELCOMES REFUGEES INC: $14k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
IHealth Inc

A statewide coalition of community-based service providers that perform care management services for chronically ill low-income individuals in New York State. Members work together to advance important role of care manag

Health
2
Go Ithaca

Provide transportation benefits, discounts and resources to developers, employers and individuals communting to and from Tompkins County to support people in commuting and getting around town in a reliable, sustainable and healthly way.

Community Improvement
3
Ithaca Alpha House Center Inc Dba Cayuga Addiction Recovery Services

A professional community resource providing caring and effective recovery services dedicated to improving quality of life by promoting individual dignity and respect for all.

Health
4
Irondequoit Ambulance Inc

Provides 24-hour daily emergency services to the Town of Irondequoit. Also provides advanced life support to the Sea Breeze Fire District, as well as mutual aid service to areas surrounding Irondequoit in Monroe County.

Health
5
Ithaca Community Childcare Center Inc

Committed to providing families with the highest standard of child-inspired, professionally-nurtured care and opportunities for learning.

Human Services
6
Food Connect Co

At food connect, we're dedicated to bridging the gaps in our food system, working to end hunger and fostering healthier communities through our innovative initiatives and programs. we build scalable technologies that support last-mile…

Food & Nutrition
7
Ithaka Land Inc

Our mission is to help people escape the cycle of poverty and homelessness, secure stable long-term housing, and achieve a self-directed vision for their lives. We achieve this mission by providing affordable, transitional housing combined…

Environment
8
Ny Community Fridge Corp

Using the power of volunteers and community partnerships to expand dignified access to food in the heart of disadvantaged communities.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank of Central New York

Food bank of central new york is a not-for-profit organization: our mission is to lead the effort to eliminate hunger in our region, through partnerships with others in our community, through education, advocacy, and distribution of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Oswego Health Inc

The mission of Oswego Health, Inc. is to provide accessible quality care and improve the health of residents in our community.

Health
11
Corning Meals on Wheels Inc

To provide nutritious meals for homebound individuals who are ill, elderly.

Food & Nutrition
12
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ithaca Health Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ithaca Welcomes Refugees Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENDAL AT ITHACA INC: $1,259,080 · Human ServicesKENDAL AT ITHACA INC+1 more: $14,000 · Human ServicesTHE CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOOD BANK OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $17,500 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ROCHESTER: $15,000 · OtherSouthside Community Center Inc: $15,000 · OtherHOSPICARE & PALLIATIVE CARE SERVICES OF TOMPKINS COUNTY INC: $14,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $34,000 · InternationalLoaves and Fishes of Tompkins County Inc: $10,000 · Food & NutritionFRIENDSHIP DONATIONS NETWORK: $10,000 · Food & NutritionITHACA COMMUNITY RECOVERY: $9,000 · Community ImprovementNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC: $8,500 · Community ImprovementITHACA HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 · HealthGOLDEN OPPORTUNITY GO INC: $15,000 · Education
Human Services$1,273,080Other$61,500International$34,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Community Improvement$17,500Health$15,000Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKENDAL AT ITHACA INC: $1,259,080 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $34,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetITHACA HEALTH ALLIANCE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetGOLDEN OPPORTUNITY GO INC: $15,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetHOSPICARE & PALLIATIVE CARE SERVICES OF TOMPKINS COUNTY INC: $14,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetITHACA WELCOMES REFUGEES INC: $14,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetLoaves and Fishes of Tompkins County Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetFRIENDSHIP DONATIONS NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FREE AND CHARITABLE CLINICS INC: $8,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Legacy Foundation of …Park Foundation IncUnited Way of Tompkin…Triad Foundation IncJM McDonald Foundatio…City Federation of Wo…Tompkins Charitable G…Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…
Community Foundation of Tompkins County IncNY28.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tompkins County Inc · Legacy Foundation of Tompkins County · Park Foundation Inc · United Way of Tompkins County Inc · Triad Foundation Inc · JM McDonald Foundation Inc · City Federation of Women's Organizations Inc · Tompkins Charitable Gift Fund Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Residents' Association of Kendal at Ithaca Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Residents' Association of Kendal at Ithaca Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Residents' Association of Kendal at Ithaca’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home