Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Resetar Mitchell L Jr Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$78k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$88kHealth$46kRecreation & Sports$22kAnimals$22kFood & Nutrition$21kInternational$14kMembership Benefit$10kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$554k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Orchard Elementary School$56,000
Camps in Common$15,000
Vista Center for the Blind$5,000
Jacob's Heart$2,000
Jerry Loyola Foundation$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Camps in Common: $15k → 10%Camps in Common: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Resetar Mitchell L Jr Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 90% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Resetar Mitchell L Jr Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$137k · 11 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$137k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+56%

Still filing today

64%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $58k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsHuman ServicesReligionMembership BenefitPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    ORCHARD SCHOOL
    3× · 2021–2023 · $32k · revenue +125%
  • CI
    Camps in Common
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +55%
  • VC
    Vista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired
    2× · 2022–2024 · $10k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • C1
    CHP 11-99 FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +43%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDSHIP PADDLEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +118%
  • DR
    Danny Ron's Rescue
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Santa Cruz Local Inc

Independent nonpartisan newsroom serving Santa Cruz County, California we are all watching and engaged in our local government, our needs are addressed, democracy works better and our community is stronger.

2
Cancer Support Community Valley Ventura/Santa Barbara Inc

Cancer support community valley/ventura/santa barbaras mission is to uplift and strengthen people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

3
Santa Cruz Sailing Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Friends of Santa Cruz State Parks

Friends of santa cruz state parks is a vital partner to california state parks, creatively working to ensure parks and beaches throughout santa cruz county and coastal san mateo county are thriving and available to all.

5
Pajaro Valley Shelter Services

Pajaro Valley Shelter Services provides families with a path toward self-sufficient futures through short-and longer-term housing and supportive services.

Human Services
6
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
7
Santa Cruz Community Farmers Market

To serve our community by providing direct access to sustainable sources of fresh produce and other unique foods, and provide education about food issues, both local and beyond.

8
Big Sur Health Center Inc

The Big Sur Health Center exists to serve the health and wellness needs of the Big Sur community by providing quality healthcare through traditional and complementary approaches that are culturally sensitive and center on patient needs.

9
Cancer Support Community San Francisco Bay Area

We provide counseling, support groups, nutrition, exercise and patient education programs for people with cancer and their caregivers and families.

Health
10
California Coastkeeper dba California Coastkeeper Alliance

California Coastkeeper Alliance unites Waterkeeper programs statewide to fight for swimmable, fishable, and drinkable waters for all Californians.

Environment
11
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
12
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Santa Cruz County and the most unlike its peers is Orchard School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Orchard Elementary School — $56,000 · OtherOrchard Elementary SchoolORCHARD SCHOOL — $31,500 · OtherORCHARD SCHOOLSecond Harvest Food Bank — $20,535 · OtherSecond Harvest Food BankHOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $10,000 · OtherHOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTYHospice of Santa Cruz Cty — $8,000 · OtherHospice of Santa Cruz CtyVista Ctr for Blind Visually Impair — $7,750 · OtherVista Ctr for Blind Visually Impair+6 more — $9,100 · Other+6 moreCamps in Common — $22,000 · Human ServicesCamps in C…Santa Cruz SPCA and Humane Society — $18,450 · AnimalsSanta Cru…MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $1,000 · AnimalsVista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired — $10,150 · HealthSANTA CRUZ CANCER BENEFIT GROUPINC — $4,731 · Health+1 more — $300 · HealthWORLD VISION INC — $14,121 · InternationalCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Membership BenefitTHE FRIENDSHIP PADDLE — $5,005 · PhilanthropyVALLEY CHURCHES UNITED — $1,000 · Religion
Other$142,885Human Services$22,000Animals$19,450Health$15,181International$14,121Membership Benefit$10,000Philanthropy$5,005Religion$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetORCHARD SCHOOL — $31,500 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetCamps in Common — $22,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSanta Cruz SPCA and Humane Society — $18,450 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $14,121 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVista Center for the Blind and Visually Impaired — $10,150 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHP 11-99 FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP PADDLE — $5,005 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetSANTA CRUZ CANCER BENEFIT GROUPINC — $4,731 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY CHURCHES UNITED — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJERRY LOYOLA FOUNDATION INC — $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Santa Cruz CountyCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Santa Cruz County · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Resetar Mitchell L Jr Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph