· Public charity
Reset Tech Action
To protect the public against digital threats to security, safety, and, fundamental rights.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $1,445,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,844,598 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,399,598 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $775k
- $250k+2 grants · $610k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BLACK MEN VOTE CIVIC ACTION FUND | $350,000 |
| ONYX IMPACT INC | $260,000 |
| SIXTEEN THIRTY FUND | $150,000 |
| SUMOFUS | $150,000 |
| PARENTS TOGETHER ACTION | $125,000 |
| EATING DISORDERS COALITION FOR RESE | $100,000 |
| ULTRA VIOLET ACTION | $100,000 |
| GOODNATION ACTION INC | $50,000 |
| GLOBAL IMPACT SOCIAL WELFARE FUND | $50,000 |
| VOTO LATINO | $50,000 |
| SUICIDE AWARENESS VOICES OF EDUCATI | $25,000 |
| PLURO LABS | $25,000 |
| MOTHERS AGAINST MEDIA ADDICTION INC | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Grants abroad, by region — $1.4M on the FY2024 return
Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: MONITOR THREATS · SUPPORT THEIR MISSIO · DIGITAL RIGHTS
Stated purpose: CORE FUNDING RESET
Stated purpose: SUPPORT CLAD · ENHACING DIGITAL COM
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ultraviolet education fund (uvef) is a 501c3 organization. ultraviolet is the premier national organization advocating for gender justice issues using creative, strategic campaigning and digital-first organizing. ultraviolet drives…
To facilitate collaboration, innovation, strategic growth and cultural impact for the media arts field. We are a network of networks; we embolden creative media organization and artists and connect them with the world.
The mission of voteamerica is to strengthen united states democracy by increasing voter turnout.
ONE Action's advocacy work plays a valuable role in persuading policy makers to protect, and where possible, increase funding for ONE Action's core priorities. ONE Action's supporters are highly engaged advocates and contributed valuable…
FDD Action is a non-profit, non-partisan 504(c)4 organization established to advocate for effective policies to promote U.S. National Security and defend free nations.
Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…
Using legal advocacy to make advances in science and technology safer for people and the planet.
To promote free expression, academic freedom, viewpoint diversity, and open scientific inquiry in the MIT community
Bold Impact is a national nonprofit dedicated to supporting a democracy where all communities get to thrive.
Powerswitch action is a national network forging collective democracy and economies in our cities and states, together with our 21 grassroots affiliates.
Partnership for Policy Integrity (PFPI) uses data-driven advocacy and litigation to fight for forests, communities and the climate.
Advocacy for Paid Family Leave for workers in the US
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Venture Fund and the most unlike its peers is Eating Disorders Coalition for Research Policy and Action Co Jaffe Management. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BLACK MEN VOTE CIVIC ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds ONYX IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds EKO AND AFFILIATE ↗
- Who funds SIXTEEN THIRTY FUND ↗
- Who funds ParentsTogether Action ↗
- Who funds UltraViolet Action ↗
- Who funds EATING DISORDERS COALITION FOR RESEARCH POLICY AND ACTION CO JAFFE MANAGEMENT ↗
- Who funds VOTO LATINO INC ↗
- Who funds Global Impact Social Welfare Fund ↗
- Who funds Goodnation Action Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds Suicide Awareness Voices of Education ↗
- Who funds ELECTRONIC PRIVACY INFORMATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds MOTHERS AGAINST MEDIA ADDICTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Open Society Action Fund Inc · Tides Foundation · Future Forward USA Action · America Votes · National Education Association of the United States · Sixteen Thirty Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Reset Tech Action funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Reset Tech Action?
Find your warmest path to Reset Tech Action through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.