Skip to content
Research to Prevent Blindness Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Research to Prevent Blindness Inc

To provide the organizational and financial resources necessary to support a comprehensive program of eye research.

$3.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$13MEmployment$4.8MEducation$2.5M
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $212k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $670k
  • $250k+8 grants · $2.5M
$125,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL-MEEI$350,000
HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL-MEEI$300,000
THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$300,000
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$300,000
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYCHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITAL$150,000
ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY$125,000
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY$115,000
UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE & DENTISTRY$115,000
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY GROSSMAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$115,000
ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY$50,000
HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL-MEEI$38,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL-MEEI: $350k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $125k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 22%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $350k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $150k → 11%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $300k → 14%STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY: $350k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE & DENTISTRY: $150k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS: $115k → 14%BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $350k → 16%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITYCHILDREN'S NATIONAL HOSPITAL: $150k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $115k → 19%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 14%WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $115k → 21%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN SAINT LOUIS SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 21%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE & PUBLIC HEALTH: $150k → 10%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $350k → 12%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 14%DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $350k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $350k → 14%THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $350k → 19%HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL-MEEI: $300k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $115k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 22%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $300k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $115k → 10%STATE UNIVERSITY OF NY UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY: $115k → 14%ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY: $300k → 14%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $150k → 14%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 12%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY FEINBERG SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $350k → 14%THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 19%HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL-MEEI: $150k → 16%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $300k → 8%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY: $125k → 10%THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $150k → 14%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $150k → 12%JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300k → 19%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $300k → 8%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY: $125k → 10%BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $150k → 8%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY: $125k → 10%ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY: $125k → 10%RESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $1.5M → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
CA
UT
NE
MO
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 19 repeat orgs$5.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
22

Total granted

$12M
$5.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+21%

Still filing today

58%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +51%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2023 · $960k · revenue +41%
  • AO
    ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $840k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • RT
    RESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS ENDOWMENT FUND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M · revenue -54%
  • Northwestern Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $350k · revenue +33%
  • TB
    THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2022 · $350k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
2
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
3
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
4
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
5
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
6
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
7
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
8
Marshall B Ketchum University

To educate caring, inspired health care professionals who are prepared to deliver collaborative, patient-centric health care in an interprofessional environment.

Education
9
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
10
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
11
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
12
Doheny Eye Institute

To further the conservation, improvement and restoration of human eyesight" (mrs. doheny - 1947).

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornell University; the most unlike its peers is The Glaucoma Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/27
Grantees still filing
25/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO: $1,510,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCOOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY: $868,000 · OtherOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITYASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INC: $840,000 · OtherASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALM…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE: $830,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVIN…REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $830,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON: $745,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTONTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS: $350,000 · OtherWeill Medical College of Cornell Univers: $345,000 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA: $330,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER: $300,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE: $300,000 · OtherVANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $300,000 · Other+8 more: $985,000 · Other+8 moreTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD…JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,380,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITYDUKE UNIVERSITY: $960,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $615,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGHTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $600,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $465,000 · EducationThe Research Foundation for The State Univer…Baylor College of Medicine: $388,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $375,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $360,000 · EducationNew York University: $345,000 · EducationRochester Institute of Technology: $300,000 · Education+5 more: $678,000 · Education+5 moreRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $1,500,000 · HealthRESEARCH TO PREVEN…MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY: $944,000 · HealthMASSACHUSETTS EYE …OPHTHALMOLOGY MEDICAL SERVICE GROUP INC: $230,000 · HealthOPHTHALMOLOGY MEDI…CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $150,000 · HealthTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $130,000 · Health+4 more: $271,112 · Health+4 moreNorthwestern University: $350,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$8,533,000Education$7,966,000Health$3,225,112Recreation & Sports$350,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $1,500,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,380,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $960,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INC: $840,000 over 7y, 4.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $615,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Research Foundation for The State University of New York: $465,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine: $388,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $375,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $360,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwestern University: $350,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $345,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRochester Institute of Technology: $300,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $265,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPHTHALMOLOGY MEDICAL SERVICE GROUP INC: $230,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION: $130,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $115,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION: $101,112 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNova Southeastern University Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $98,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE ARVO FOUNDATION FOR EYE RESEARCH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RESEARCH TO PREVENT BLINDNESS ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS EYE & EAR INFIRMARY ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Rochester Institute of Technology ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds OPHTHALMOLOGY MEDICAL SERVICE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA TECH RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Research to Prevent B…Vanderbilt University…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Research to Prevent BlindnessNY13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Research to Prevent Blindness · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Research to Prevent Blindness Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Research to Prevent Blindness Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Nova Southeastern University Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Research to Prevent Blindness Inc?

Find your warmest path to Research to Prevent Blindness Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Research to Prevent Blindness’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home