Skip to content

· Private foundation

Renee Rebecca and Richard Elmen Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Animals$128kEducation$67kHealth$20kFood & Nutrition$16kHuman Services$12kArts & Culture$5kPublic Benefit$4kSocial Science$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$731k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON$5,000
SIOUX FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY$4,340
BROOKINS REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY$4,000
SIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$4,000
SIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS$4,000
SIOUX FALLS ARERA HUNANE SOCIETY$2,200
AUGUSTANA COLLEGE$2,000
THE STUTTERING FOUNDATION$1,000
SO DAK SPORTSMEN AGAINST HUNGER$1,000
SIOUX EMPIRE TNR COALITION$1,000
OGORMAN HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
ST MARY SCHOOL$1,000
PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS$500
COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW$400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%DOVE LEWIS ER & ICU ANIMAL HOSP: $5k → 12%THE STUTTERING FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON: $6k → 9%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $7k → 9%SO DAK SPORTSMEN AGAINST HUNGER: $2k → 10%BROOOKINS HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 13%DOVE LEWIS ER & ICU ANIMAL HOSP: $3k → 12%THE STUTTERING FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON: $6k → 9%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $7k → 9%SO DAK SPORTSMEN AGAINST HUNGER: $2k → 10%BROOOKINS HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 13%DOVE LEWIS ER &ICU ANIMAL HOSP: $3k → 12%THE STUTTERING FOUNDATION: $2k → 17%HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON: $6k → 9%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $7k → 9%BROOKINS REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 13%HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON: $5k → 9%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $6k → 9%BROOOKINS HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 13%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 12%HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON: $5k → 9%AUGUSTANA COLLEGE: $4k → 9%BROOOKINS HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 13%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 12%HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON: $5k → 9%BROOOKINS HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 13%OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 12%HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON: $5k → 9%BROOKINGS REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 13%HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON: $5k → 9%HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON: $5k → 9%SIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $4k → 9%SIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $4k → 9%SIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 9%SIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 9%SIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 9%SIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 9%SIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 9%SIOUX FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY: $7k → 9%SIOUX FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY: $7k → 9%SIOUX FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY: $6k → 9%SIOUX FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 9%SIOUX FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY: $5k → 9%SIOUX FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY: $4k → 9%SIOUX FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 9%SIOUX FALLS HUMANE SOCIETY: $3k → 9%SIOUX FALLS ARERA HUNANE SOCIETY: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
OR
SD
IN
CA
NE
MO
VA
AZ
KS
TN
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$281k · 27 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
17

Total granted

$281k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+77%

Still filing today

48%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $44k · revenue +89%
  • AU
    AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +79%
  • SF
    Stuttering Foundation of America
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • Y
    YMCA
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • DL
    DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +77%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
2
North Dakota State University Foundation

Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.

Education
3
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition
4
Spokane Humane Society

The vision of Spokane Humane Society is to enrich the lives of animals and their companions through Support, Education, Advocacy and Love (SEAL). As the oldest local non-profit in Spokane, we have been serving companion animals in need and…

Animals
5
Humane Society of Utah

The humane society of utah is dedicated to the elimination of pain, fear, and suffering in all animals. in 2024, hsu provided over 13,000 affordable spay/neuter surgeries, administered 121,000 vaccinations, adopted 6,363 pets into loving…

Animals
6
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
7
The Humane League

We exist to end the abuse of animals raised for food. this mission is executed by persuading companies and institutions to adopt animal welfare policies through negotiation and pressure campaigns, and then holding them accountable to their…

Animals
8
University of Sioux Falls

The university of sioux falls, a christian university in the liberal arts tradition, educates students in the humanities, sciences and professions. the traditional motto of the university is culture for service, that is, we seek to foster…

Education
9
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
10
Animal Agriculture Alliance

The animal agriculture alliance is a nonprofit organization that helps bridge the communication gap between farm and fork. we connect food industry stakeholders, engage food chain influencers and promote consumer choice by helping key…

Food & Nutrition
11
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
12
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sioux Falls Area Humane Society; the most unlike its peers is Stuttering Foundation of America. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTON: $47,500 · OtherHUMANE SOC FOR SW WASHIGTONSIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLS: $34,000 · OtherSIOUX FALLS CATHOLIC SCHOOLSBROOOKINS HUMANE SOCIETY: $22,575 · OtherBROOOKINS HUMANE SOCIETYStuttering Foundation of America: $17,000 · OtherStuttering Foundation of AmericaDOVE LEWIS ER & ICU ANIMAL HOSP: $10,660 · OtherDOVE LEWIS ER & ICU ANIMAL HOSPMCCROSSANS: $5,300 · Other+25 more: $17,375 · Other+25 moreSIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $43,630 · AnimalsSIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SO…OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,280 · AnimalsOREGON HUMANE SOCIETYBrookings Regional Humane Society Inc: $7,000 · AnimalsBrookings Regional Humane …+2 more: $2,000 · AnimalsAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $38,790 · EducationAUGUSTANA UNIVE…+3 more: $920 · EducationSOUTH DAKOTA SPORTSMEN AGAINST HUNGER: $16,000 · Food & NutritionTHE BANQUET: $1,200 · Food & Nutrition+1 more: $50 · Food & NutritionCLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN: $5,100 · Arts & CulturePAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $3,000 · Public BenefitLeadership Institute: $500 · Public BenefitSANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,350 · Philanthropy+1 more: $32 · PhilanthropyLIFESCAPE FOUNDATION: $1,320 · Health
Other$154,410Animals$67,910Education$39,710Food & Nutrition$17,250Arts & Culture$5,100Public Benefit$3,500Philanthropy$2,382Health$1,320

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY: $43,630 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION: $38,790 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetStuttering Foundation of America: $17,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA SPORTSMEN AGAINST HUNGER: $16,000 over 9y, 2.6% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $15,280 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBrookings Regional Humane Society Inc: $7,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN: $5,100 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY VISITATION CENTER: $2,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION: $2,350 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW: $1,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESCAPE FOUNDATION: $1,320 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BANQUET: $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIOUX EMPIRE TNR COALITION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $220 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarvey Phillips Foundation Inc: $32 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Stuttering Foundation of America ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA SPORTSMEN AGAINST HUNGER ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Brookings Regional Humane Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLARE BOOTHE LUCE CENTER FOR CONSERVATIVE WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY VISITATION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR A CONSTRUCTIVE TOMORROW ↗
  • Who funds LIFESCAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BANQUET ↗
  • Who funds DOVE LEWIS EMERGENCY ANIMAL HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SIOUX EMPIRE TNR COALITION ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation IncSD17.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · Avera Health · Sanford Group Return · Midcontinent Foundation · The Graco Foundation · South Dakota Community Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Renee Rebecca and Richard Elmen Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Renee Rebecca and Richard Elmen Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Renee Rebecca and Richard Elmen Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Renee Rebecca and Richard Elmen Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Renee Rebecca and Richard Elmen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph