Skip to content
Rekindle the Spirit at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Rekindle the Spirit

The mission of the rialto theatre is to serve as a center to the arts, enriching the community by offering the opportunity for all ages and backgrounds , to experience high quality , diverse, affordable performing arts, films, and educational experiences.

$52k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2022.

Arts & Culture$70kHealth$62kEducation$60kPhilanthropy$50kHuman Services$10k
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANTON NURSING ASSOCIATION$32,485
PA CITIZENS FOR BETTER LIBRARIES$10,000
FRENCH AZILUM$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barton County Historical Society

Historical museum and library. preservation of historical information and materials relating to barton county kansas.

—
2
Bureau County Historical Society
—
3
The Bradford Brinton Memorial
Arts & Culture
4
Brockport Community Museum
Arts & Culture
5
Fulton County Historical Society

Historical museums and genelogical records

Arts & Culture
6
Bradford Ohio Railroad Museum

Preservation & restoration of railroad history.

Arts & Culture
7
Anderson Twp Historical Society Inc
—
8
Broken Arrow Historical Society in

Preserve local history of broken arrow

Arts & Culture
9
Historical Soc Mllrsbrg & U P

History preservation to preserve history of millersburg boro and upper paxton twp museum in old fire station

—
10
Bricktown Model Railroaders Association

Provide a museum of local railroads

Arts & Culture
11
Cumberland County Historical Society

Historical library & museums

Arts & Culture
12
Pioneer Historical Society of Bedford County Inc

Historical library

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bradford County Historical Society; the most unlike its peers is French Azilum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CANTON COMMUNITY NURSING SERVICE: $52,485 · OtherCANTON COMMUNITY NURSING SERVICEGREEN FREE LIBRARY: $50,000 · OtherGREEN FREE LIBRARYBRADFORD COUNTY REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL INC: $10,000 · OtherBRADFORD COUNTY REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL INCFRENCH AZILUM INC: $10,000 · OtherFRENCH AZILUM INCHOME TEXTILE TOOL MUSEUM: $10,000 · OtherHOME TEXTILE TOOL MUSEUMCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE TWIN TIERS: $50,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION F…BRADFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureBRADFORD COUNTY H…TROY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 · Arts & CultureTROY HISTORICAL S…BRADFORD COUNTY HERITAGE ASSOC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureBRADFORD COUNTY H…LEROY HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLEROY HERITAGE MU…WESTERN ALLIANCE EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $10,000 · HealthPENNSYLVANIA CITIZENS FOR BETTER LIBRARIES: $10,000 · EducationAREA AGENCY ON AGING FOR THE COUNTIES OF BRADFORDSULLIVANSUSQUEHANNATIOGA INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$132,485Philanthropy$50,000Arts & Culture$40,000Health$10,000Education$10,000Human Services$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE TWIN TIERS: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetGREEN FREE LIBRARY: $50,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetWESTERN ALLIANCE EMERGENCY SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBRADFORD COUNTY REGIONAL ARTS COUNCIL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBRADFORD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetTROY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 38% of budgetFRENCH AZILUM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetBRADFORD COUNTY HERITAGE ASSOC: $10,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA CITIZENS FOR BETTER LIBRARIES: $10,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetLEROY HERITAGE MUSEUM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetAREA AGENCY ON AGING FOR THE COUNTIES OF BRADFORDSULLIVANSUSQUEHANNATIOGA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Bradfor…Amazonsmile Foundation
United Way of Bradford CountyPA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Bradford County · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Rekindle the Spirit funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Rekindle the Spirit. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Rekindle the Spirit?

    Find your warmest path to Rekindle the Spirit through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $7k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rekindle the Spirit’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home